Mk Match Thread (Part 3)
#141
Posted 04 March 2015 - 09:52 PM
#142
Posted 04 March 2015 - 10:51 PM
starsky72, on 04 March 2015 - 09:52 PM, said:
Thoroughly deserved for the other 2 he got away with.
#143
Posted 04 March 2015 - 11:18 PM
starsky72, on 04 March 2015 - 09:52 PM, said:
Totally deserved a yellow for that. Shocking challenge by an experienced (admittedly past it and not the fastest) pro, blatantly no intention to play the ball and the usual arms up in the arm I'm innocent ref shytte. I say shocking because he knew that block could have hurt his opponent, full marks to the ref
#144
Posted 05 March 2015 - 09:09 AM
brianclose, on 04 March 2015 - 04:08 PM, said:
The whole move from the pressing and stealing of the ball (who was that?) and everything Roberts did was great, particularly the way he shaped his body to hit right and dummied it into the space opened up on the left in the strike on goal - he bamboozled everyone!
Spire-Power, on 04 March 2015 - 11:18 PM, said:
Correct - at least a yellow.
#145
Posted 05 March 2015 - 09:23 AM
Nerima Spireite, on 05 March 2015 - 09:09 AM, said:
Clucas i think...
#147
Posted 05 March 2015 - 09:55 AM
Nerima Spireite, on 05 March 2015 - 09:09 AM, said:
The bloke is sheer class, can't stop watching the turn
#148
Posted 05 March 2015 - 10:18 AM
JonB, on 05 March 2015 - 09:23 AM, said:
Did the same Saturday for the 3rd too didn't he?
#150
Posted 05 March 2015 - 10:40 AM
#151
Posted 05 March 2015 - 10:53 AM
#153
Posted 05 March 2015 - 11:03 AM
#154 Guest_mikethespire_*
Posted 05 March 2015 - 12:16 PM
RN Blue, on 05 March 2015 - 10:34 AM, said:
Not sure I agree.
Their goal was a "wonder strike" which "rocketted" in after "bending it beautifully"
Roberts goal was "A defensive howler" that "gifted" the ball to Roberts so he could "race through" to "comfortably" score
and our winner was their defense "allowing Lavery to get the simplest of finishes"
Now imagine we had described the goals instead as
"MK Dons took the lead when the Chesterfield defense left Baker totally unmarked on the edge of the area with plenty of time to pick his spot to score"
"The equalizer came following good work from Clucas closing down Spence and dispossessing him before sliding the ball to Roberts. Roberts still had plenty to do but a clever nutmeg gave the chance to place it skillfuly into the net"
"The winner came following a cross from Darikwa which took a deflection. Lavery adjusted better and beat the keeper with a deft flick finish"
Both reports are correct but read very differently don't they.
#155
Posted 05 March 2015 - 01:06 PM
mikethespire, on 05 March 2015 - 12:16 PM, said:
Their goal was a "wonder strike" which "rocketted" in after "bending it beautifully"
Roberts goal was "A defensive howler" that "gifted" the ball to Roberts so he could "race through" to "comfortably" score
and our winner was their defense "allowing Lavery to get the simplest of finishes"
Now imagine we had described the goals instead as
"MK Dons took the lead when the Chesterfield defense left Baker totally unmarked on the edge of the area with plenty of time to pick his spot to score"
"The equalizer came following good work from Clucas closing down Spence and dispossessing him before sliding the ball to Roberts. Roberts still had plenty to do but a clever nutmeg gave the chance to place it skillfuly into the net"
"The winner came following a cross from Darikwa which took a deflection. Lavery adjusted better and beat the keeper with a deft flick finish"
Both reports are correct but read very differently don't they.
Often, looking at match reports from local media, the truth sits somewhere in the middle.
I suspect the brief is to try to remain impartial, but ultimately they're worried about circulation and readership in that area so are going to skew the report towards the intended readership.
Similar on messageboards, good play isn't always recognised by the opposing fans
#156
Posted 05 March 2015 - 01:14 PM
#157
Posted 05 March 2015 - 01:18 PM
mikethespire, on 05 March 2015 - 12:16 PM, said:
Their goal was a "wonder strike" which "rocketted" in after "bending it beautifully"
Roberts goal was "A defensive howler" that "gifted" the ball to Roberts so he could "race through" to "comfortably" score
and our winner was their defense "allowing Lavery to get the simplest of finishes"
Now imagine we had described the goals instead as
"MK Dons took the lead when the Chesterfield defense left Baker totally unmarked on the edge of the area with plenty of time to pick his spot to score"
"The equalizer came following good work from Clucas closing down Spence and dispossessing him before sliding the ball to Roberts. Roll berts still had plenty to do but a clever nutmeg gave the chance to place it skillfuly into the net"
"The winner came following a cross from Darikwa which took a deflection. Lavery adjusted better and beat the keeper with a deft flick finish"
Both reports are correct but read very differently don't they.
...and I agree far more with your version! Although I would grant that after leaving their bloke way too much space unmarked on the edge of our box, he did pick his spot and let fly very well. Everything else in that report seems very balanced and honest though.
This post has been edited by Nerima Spireite: 05 March 2015 - 01:22 PM
#158
Posted 05 March 2015 - 02:44 PM
mikethespire, on 05 March 2015 - 12:16 PM, said:
Their goal was a "wonder strike" which "rocketted" in after "bending it beautifully"
Roberts goal was "A defensive howler" that "gifted" the ball to Roberts so he could "race through" to "comfortably" score
and our winner was their defense "allowing Lavery to get the simplest of finishes"
Now imagine we had described the goals instead as
"MK Dons took the lead when the Chesterfield defense left Baker totally unmarked on the edge of the area with plenty of time to pick his spot to score"
"The equalizer came following good work from Clucas closing down Spence and dispossessing him before sliding the ball to Roberts. Roberts still had plenty to do but a clever nutmeg gave the chance to place it skillfully into the net"
"The winner came following a cross from Darikwa which took a deflection. Lavery adjusted better and beat the keeper with a deft flick finish"
Both reports are correct but read very differently don't they.
Spot on Mike. I know which one is the truth !!!
#159
Posted 05 March 2015 - 03:25 PM
mikethespire, on 05 March 2015 - 12:16 PM, said:
Their goal was a "wonder strike" which "rocketted" in after "bending it beautifully"
Roberts goal was "A defensive howler" that "gifted" the ball to Roberts so he could "race through" to "comfortably" score
and our winner was their defense "allowing Lavery to get the simplest of finishes"
Now imagine we had described the goals instead as
"MK Dons took the lead when the Chesterfield defense left Baker totally unmarked on the edge of the area with plenty of time to pick his spot to score"
"The equalizer came following good work from Clucas closing down Spence and dispossessing him before sliding the ball to Roberts. Roberts still had plenty to do but a clever nutmeg gave the chance to place it skillfuly into the net"
"The winner came following a cross from Darikwa which took a deflection. Lavery adjusted better and beat the keeper with a deft flick finish"
Both reports are correct but read very differently don't they.
There arent many goals where opponents are blameless. Usually someone could have done better somewhere along the line. Wonder strikes may be the only exception, though this wasnt one, just a very good finish with time and space.
#160
Posted 05 March 2015 - 03:38 PM
bullseyerob, on 04 March 2015 - 09:13 PM, said:

Sorry I meant at home....
We have achieved winning 3 games at MK Dons what Man utd,Bristol city and Swindon have been unable to do at all this term and that's shows on the day we can beat anyone home or away in this league and the way the league table stands we are one point off another trip to MK in the play offs.
Can anyone else see this happening...a fourth trip and a fourth win must be a record in one season.
While I dont expect us to make the play offs (still fancy Bradford, then doncaster) if we did do you not think we would be pushing our luck to turn over MK at their place again? Is it getting less probable?