[Dotty Com]

It's now clear for all of us to see the limitations of this squad and its manager.

However, here's the thing, CFC's treatment of Johnson will provide every incentive to Premiership/Championship clubs to lend us quality players to help us out

NB: How many games did Sheridad go without a win?

It remains the case that we need (and in no particular order) - a right back, a left back (good to see Scottie having a great time at Luton), a playmaker (good to see Randall doing well at MK Dons), and 2 strikers.

[LuSiVe]

Dotty Com, on 28 October 2014 - 09:49 PM, said:

However, here's the thing, CFC's treatment of Johnson will provide every incentive to Premiership/Championship clubs to lend us quality players to help us out.

I'm not sure failing to play him will impress anyone.

[Dotty Com]

LuSiVe, on 28 October 2014 - 09:52 PM, said:

I'm not sure failing to play him will impress anyone.

I couldn't agree with you more - based on his treatment I wouldn't lend CFC a gum boil if I'd got a mouthful of them

[lindo-spireite]

You really are a sad pathetic man, rob.

[valemadness]

Dotty Com, on 28 October 2014 - 09:49 PM, said:

It's now clear for all of us to see the limitations of this squad and its manager.

However, here's the thing, CFC's treatment of Johnson will provide every incentive to Premiership/Championship clubs to lend us quality players to help us out

NB: How many games did Sheridad go without a win?

It remains the case that we need (and in no particular order) - a right back, a left back (good to see Scottie having a great time at Luton), a playmaker (good to see Randall doing well at MK Dons), and 2 strikers.

Exactly what do people know for a fact? CFC have thrown the dummy out because they signed him for a 3 month loan but thought the rules wouldn't apply to them and that we'd be able to extend the loan as much as we wanted? It's always conspiracy theories. We've treated so and so really bad and refuse to play Fred cos he looked at Cook wrong.
Phil Tooley has said that he picked up a slight knock which while not serious enough to send him back, did mean he couldn't play a game or 2, possibly at the request of his club. He travelled on Saturday, which suggests he may have been 50/50 to be on the bench.
I don't know what is the real story, but I would trust Phil a lot more than any of the people on here saying Cook's thrown his dummy out because he can't keep him on loan.

[lindo-spireite]

Marcia why is this clown allowed to post after being banned twice?

[Dotty Com]

valemadness, on 28 October 2014 - 09:59 PM, said:

Exactly what do people know for a fact? CFC have thrown the dummy out because they signed him for a 3 month loan but thought the rules wouldn't apply to them and that we'd be able to extend the loan as much as we wanted? It's always conspiracy theories. We've treated so and so really bad and refuse to play Fred cos he looked at Cook wrong.
Phil Tooley has said that he picked up a slight knock which while not serious enough to send him back, did mean he couldn't play a game or 2, possibly at the request of his club. He travelled on Saturday, which suggests he may have been 50/50 to be on the bench.
I don't know what is the real story, but I would trust Phil a lot more than any of the people on here saying Cook's thrown his dummy out because he can't keep him on loan.

You overlook Cook's own comments - if I play Johnson and deny Banks, Gardner ... etc match time.

[valemadness]

lindo-spireite, on 28 October 2014 - 10:00 PM, said:

Marcia why is this clown allowed to post after being banned twice?

as far as I am aware apart from someone suddenly saying oh look a new poster it must be RPL, no proof has been given to the mods that they are not who they say they are.

[Goku]

valemadness, on 28 October 2014 - 10:03 PM, said:

as far as I am aware apart from someone suddenly saying oh look a new poster it must be RPL, no proof has been given to the mods that they are not who they say they are.

are u for real

look at the op. mentions of randall, griffiths and use of "NB" and it's not rpl looooool

[Dotty Com]

Both quality players - used to illustrate. NB? Deary me, even my 11 year old has sufficient grasp of the English language.

Would be like me accusing a new poster identifying Smith as the best LB ever as being GOKU in disguise? Or indeed anybody that uses bad language. Chill

[azul]

valemadness, on 28 October 2014 - 09:59 PM, said:

Exactly what do people know for a fact? CFC have thrown the dummy out because they signed him for a 3 month loan but thought the rules wouldn't apply to them and that we'd be able to extend the loan as much as we wanted? It's always conspiracy theories. We've treated so and so really bad and refuse to play Fred cos he looked at Cook wrong.
Phil Tooley has said that he picked up a slight knock which while not serious enough to send him back, did mean he couldn't play a game or 2, possibly at the request of his club. He travelled on Saturday, which suggests he may have been 50/50 to be on the bench.
I don't know what is the real story, but I would trust Phil a lot more than any of the people on here saying Cook's thrown his dummy out because he can't keep him on loan.

If you listen to the interview again you'll hear PC say it was a mistake to play Roberts rather than Johnson

I'm afraid that contradicts what PC said in the interview and what Phil posted on here

This post has been edited by azul: 28 October 2014 - 10:29 PM

[ELTON 2020]

Dotty Com, on 28 October 2014 - 10:03 PM, said:

You overlook Cook's own comments - if I play Johnson and deny Banks, Gardner ... etc match time.

Banks is awful ATM...he needs to go out on loan

[meowdmucker]

azul, on 28 October 2014 - 10:23 PM, said:

If you listen to the interview again you'll hear PC say it was a mistake to play Roberts rather than Johnson

I'm afraid that contradicts what PC said in the interview and what Phil posted on here

Exactly that. Maybe backtracking to keep the fans happy, maybe not. Only P.C knows the truth but some very odd interviews from him recently that's for sure.

[fatfrank]

Dotty Com, on 28 October 2014 - 10:10 PM, said:

Both quality players - used to illustrate. NB? Deary me, even my 11 year old has sufficient grasp of the English language.

Would be like me accusing a new poster identifying Smith as the best LB ever as being GOKU in disguise? Or indeed anybody that uses bad language. Chill

It's a pity you don't NB is short for Nota Bene Latin not English.