[Hector]

oh dear, another thread turns into a boring, pointless thread!

Have to say, I've had enough.

Bye.

[azul]

NOKIN, on 11 February 2014 - 08:15 AM, said:

See what I mean.....

Azul and WarwickshireSpireite actively and openly encourage this troll to post and then moan about it when he does.

I thought you started this pointless thread; anyway thought you were taking a sabbatical due to the state of this message board

I'm cool about RPL and Luke (unlike yourself). However I normally don't engage with them but I am genuinely concerned about their mental state.

This post has been edited by azul: 11 February 2014 - 10:31 AM

[paulcookfanclub]

Too right Hector!

quote name='Hector' timestamp='1392111955' post='971051']
oh dear, another thread turns into a boring, pointless thread!

Have to say, I've had enough.

Bye.
[/quote]

[WarwickshireSpireite]

NOKIN, on 11 February 2014 - 08:15 AM, said:

See what I mean.....

Azul and WarwickshireSpireite actively and openly encourage this troll to post and then moan about it when he does.

Apologies Nokin, but I don't actively encourage Luke to post at all, unless you think by pointing out the constant inaccuracy in his posts somehow goes as active encouragement?

Also can't think where I have moaned about him posting either.

Maybe when starting this thread did you not think it would actively encourage a response from Luke, as clearly it would and did.

[Bankrobber]

NOKIN, on 11 February 2014 - 08:15 AM, said:

See what I mean.....

Azul and WarwickshireSpireite actively and openly encourage this troll to post and then moan about it when he does.

I have to agree.

Luke probably thinks it's great fun polluting the board and hijacking every thread with his inane ramblings. I'm not going to let a Stag put me off using this (our) board but it's certainly hard work at the moment.

[RPL42YEARS]

This thread really makes me chuckle:-

a) a debating board which you can join but should not post as this equals attention seeking;
b) if you do post then limit the number of threads - restrict debate;
c) having an ignore function - its not enough just to pick and choose what you read;
d) if you have a different opinion to the majority get ready for it - trolling;
e) moderators encouraged to ban posters - the said people doing the encouraging being the one's that issue bad language and threats;
f) you needs green and red point system - read posts I agree with and posts I disagree with - how adult and mature; "minus me you know you want to" is my tongue in cheek response to this childish system;
g) ... oh the irony, double standards ... etc

[azul]

Bankrobber, on 11 February 2014 - 08:35 PM, said:

I have to agree.

Luke probably thinks it's great fun polluting the board and hijacking every thread with his inane ramblings. I'm not going to let a Stag put me off using this (our) board but it's certainly hard work at the moment.

Do you really agree?

You see no irony in opening a thread clearly related to Luke, thus attracting him and then complaining when people contribute to the thread

As for Luke the lad has clearly has an OCD and cant help himself

[WarwickshireSpireite]

NOKIN, on 11 February 2014 - 08:15 AM, said:

See what I mean.....

Azul and WarwickshireSpireite actively and openly encourage this troll to post and then moan about it when he does.

Bankrobber, on 11 February 2014 - 08:35 PM, said:

I have to agree.

Luke probably thinks it's great fun polluting the board and hijacking every thread with his inane ramblings. I'm not going to let a Stag put me off using this (our) board but it's certainly hard work at the moment.

Which part of Nokin's post above do you agree with?

Maybe have a read at my reply to Nokin post 64

This post has been edited by WarwickshireSpireite: 11 February 2014 - 09:42 PM

[Tha Knows...]

azul, on 11 February 2014 - 08:51 PM, said:

Do you really agree?

You see no irony in opening a thread clearly related to Luke, thus attracting him and then complaining when people contribute to the thread

As for Luke the lad has clearly has an OCD and cant help himself

Yes he is one sad case. Says he's staying off our forum and then he's back the next day. A guy with no life. What a fruitcake!

[stagmanluke]

WarwickshireSpireite, on 11 February 2014 - 07:01 PM, said:

Apologies Nokin, but I don't actively encourage Luke to post at all, unless you think by pointing out the constant inaccuracy in his posts somehow goes as active encouragement?

Also can't think where I have moaned about him posting either.

Maybe when starting this thread did you not think it would actively encourage a response from Luke, as clearly it would and did.

Thanks Warwks, you seem OK in fairness.

As for Nokin..

Putty = hands.

[shaun1866]

stagmanluke, on 10 February 2014 - 09:03 PM, said:

That's rubbish Roman. I haven't openly commented on a Chesterfield issue for several weeks now.

Then why come on then ? as after all it's a chesterfield message board.

[RPL42YEARS]

So why do we stand in the Derby Tup having a chat with the away fans? Its not that different is it? As long as its reasoned argument.

[Johnnyspireite7]

RPL42YEARS, on 13 February 2014 - 01:50 PM, said:

So why do we stand in the Derby Tup having a chat with the away fans? Its not that different is it? As long as its reasoned argument.

Because on here you can hide behind your user name and be as inflammatory as you like without major reprisals, whereas in the pub if certain people said some of the guff they put on here they'd be punched in the mouth!!!

[stagmanluke]

This post has been edited by stagmanluke: 13 February 2014 - 04:02 PM

[Johnnyspireite7]

stagmanluke, on 13 February 2014 - 03:02 PM, said:

Or they may well be punched back Jon... Wrong place, wrong time - it happens.

I still retain I have not commented on a Chesterfield related issue for a while, and I really don't understand what the issue is.

You've had 20 years of superiority of us. That must change. So I'm prepared to be someone looking over your shoulders until that should happen.

Those who keep telling me to do one are either worried about 22nd March, think I'm a prick, or both.

I really couldn't give a monkey.

Did I mention you by name? No, I said certain people!!!! Main one being the person I answered to!!!!

[stagmanluke]

Johnnyspireite7, on 13 February 2014 - 03:56 PM, said:

Did I mention you by name? No, I said certain people!!!! Main one being the person I answered to!!!!

Huge apologies Jon and post deleted.

[fishini]

RPL42YEARS, on 13 February 2014 - 01:50 PM, said:

So why do we stand in the Derby Tup having a chat with the away fans? Its not that different is it? As long as its reasoned argument.

When it involves you a see a small problem here

[RPL42YEARS]

Johnnyspireite7, on 13 February 2014 - 02:31 PM, said:

Because on here you can hide behind your user name and be as inflammatory as you like without major reprisals, whereas in the pub if certain people said some of the guff they put on here they'd be punched in the mouth!!!

Would they? Says it all really. What you mean is say anything that other people disagree with. As long as its football argument physical violence should never enter into it. You'd have us back to the violent times that were the 70's and 80's.

fishini, on 13 February 2014 - 07:04 PM, said:

When it involves you a see a small problem here

I'm a reasonable chap.

[clarevoyant.]

RPL42YEARS, on 13 February 2014 - 01:50 PM, said:

So why do we stand in the Derby Tup having a chat with the away fans? Its not that different is it? As long as its reasoned argument.

Tha barred

[clarevoyant.]

clarevoyant., on 14 February 2014 - 10:50 AM, said:

Tha barred

Whoops only just seen Lester thread