Help
Jonno, on 08 October 2013 - 09:06 AM, said:
As usual, you make some good points, but you undermine your whole argument when you come out with drivel such as 'let's play 3-5-2'.
I speak as someone who was at the game on Saturday. To me, the second half was bizarre, as we looked poor at the back yet at the same time I didn't think anyone individually within the backline had an absolute stinker.
Certainly think we would have looked better with Drew at full back, and that's no slight on Hird as he was doing the job he was asked to do.
He has grown on me alot but I'd stick with Evatt and Cooper for the time being. We have to play our strongest XI. People saying Evatt looked unfit, I don't agree at all. They weren't saying that at half time.
I speak as someone who was at the game on Saturday. To me, the second half was bizarre, as we looked poor at the back yet at the same time I didn't think anyone individually within the backline had an absolute stinker.
Certainly think we would have looked better with Drew at full back, and that's no slight on Hird as he was doing the job he was asked to do.
He has grown on me alot but I'd stick with Evatt and Cooper for the time being. We have to play our strongest XI. People saying Evatt looked unfit, I don't agree at all. They weren't saying that at half time.
Perhaps he wasn't "match fit", and tired in the second half. Understandable given the time he's been out of action.
The problem with Evatt is he needs games to get match fit, but we can't afford to concede many and lose games waiting for him to be fit enough to last the 90 minutes. Hopefully the 45 minutes on saturday will have given the players the warning they need that teams aren't going to lay down and just allow us the win games, games aren't won in 45 minutes, they last the full 90.
