[Spireite™]

Not so sure about compo but something really has got to be done, maybe something like



VIDEO TECHNOLOGY


For the sake of ten seconds to see if it really is spot kick or goal, or offside.

This post has been edited by Spireite: 18 February 2006 - 10:22 PM

[Hong Kong Spireite]

Spireite, on Feb 18 2006, 10:22 PM, said:

Not so sure about compo but something really has got to be done, maybe something like
VIDEO TECHNOLOGY
For the sake of ten seconds to see if it really is spot kick or goal, or offside.

Do you really think Mr Richardson would have looked at the video today? Even if he did, he probably would still insist he was right!

I have to say that I don't hold out much hope for Janos's card being rescinded because of those incompetent buffoons at the FA who seem to have it in for us

[spirette]

absolutely, in an ideal world clubs would get some sort of compo for bad decisions. Trouble is, we don't live in an ideal world.

Because, in an ideal world the ref from yesterday would admit he made a wrong decision bu i doubt he won't!

Yes, I agree, bad decisions cost clubs a lot, even jobs, so its time clubs got SOMETHING for these clowns who referee the games every week.

[dannypearson]

MP-Spire, on Feb 18 2006, 10:18 PM, said:

I haven't seen the video, but by the sound of things Janos' is in the clear and he should get his red card lifted, but that doesn't change the result does it?

Decisions like this are costing football clubs up and down the country a lot of money and in some cases, managers end up losing their jobs. With this in mind, have we got to a stage whereby the FA should compensate Clubs financially for 'wrong' decisions?

Afterall incompetent officials are bringing the game into disrepute with their poor conduct.

Where do you draw the line though?

A penalty?
A tight offside call?
A bad decision to give a corner that a team score from?
A bad decision to give a free kick on the half way line which brings about a goal?
A bad decision on the half way line that leads to a corner where the team score from?
A bad decision in their half where they take a free-kick play 20-30 consecutive passes and score a belter in the top corner?


Bad decision's (as much as we dislike it) are part of football, no way can teams be compensated, and as often gets said, they tend to even themselves out over the season.

[sophocles]

dannypearson, on Feb 19 2006, 03:33 PM, said:

Where do you draw the line though?

A penalty?
A tight offside call?
A bad decision to give a corner that a team score from?
A bad decision to give a free kick on the half way line which brings about a goal?
A bad decision on the half way line that leads to a corner where the team score from?
A bad decision in their half where they take a free-kick play 20-30 consecutive passes and score a belter in the top corner?
Bad decision's (as much as we dislike it) are part of football, no way can teams be compensated, and as often gets said, they tend to even themselves out over the season.

Annoyed as I am about Deadman, that's the most (only?) sensible post on here so far.

[BOBBY]

but video evidence etc would only benfit chelski, wanki-manky, ******** etc- since whn did the f.a give a monkeys about clubs like us???
accept it, clubs like us will always get shafted by the f.a...... money talks

(shame for cochester, score flattered chelski.... as before, money talks)

[Hoare (400)]

spirette, on Feb 19 2006, 03:25 PM, said:

absolutely, in an ideal world clubs would get some sort of compo for bad decisions. Trouble is, we don't live in an ideal world.

Because, in an ideal world the ref from yesterday would admit he made a wrong decision bu i doubt he won't!

Yes, I agree, bad decisions cost clubs a lot, even jobs, so its time clubs got SOMETHING for these clowns who referee the games every week.

In an ideal world, most Refs would take up gardening instead of refeering, and the FA would have competent people working for it, instead of the idiots running football at the moment.

Hoare (400)