[david_cfc]

If Tina Jenner has a picture surely they have a case to appeal, and then an even bigger case that the ref was a W4NK3R!

[Chris_CFC]

the video evidence shows it. He will win the appeal, we won`t get any points. The ref wants the sack.

[DMU Blue]

arnt appeals based on what type of view the ref had. if he writes in his report that he had a clear view of it then we wont win it. if he says he doesnt feel confident he had a 100% view of it and feels there mite be a chance he got it wrong the fa can step in. i think

[cfcscott153]

Didnt see the penalty appeal..but why the hell did Kovacs get MOTM. What about O'Hara and Pickin or does it not matter about who plays well??

[david_cfc]

Meden Blue, on Feb 18 2006, 06:04 PM, said:

arnt appeals based on what type of view the ref had. if he writes in his report that he had a clear view of it then we wont win it. if he says he doesnt feel confident he had a 100% view of it and feels there mite be a chance he got it wrong the fa can step in. i think

He could say he had a clear view but if video evidence proves him wrong then hes wrong!

cfcscott153, on Feb 18 2006, 06:08 PM, said:

Didnt see the penalty appeal..but why the hell did Kovacs get MOTM. What about O'Hara and Pickin or does it not matter about who plays well??

To show the ref that he is an ejit! Kovacs was upset because it blatantly wasnt a penalty!

[Lorraine]

Meden Blue, on Feb 18 2006, 06:04 PM, said:

arnt appeals based on what type of view the ref had. if he writes in his report that he had a clear view of it then we wont win it. if he says he doesnt feel confident he had a 100% view of it and feels there mite be a chance he got it wrong the fa can step in. i think

The video clearly shows the ball hits Kovacs' right shoulder, however the referee was right in front of Kovacs when it happened. I doubt we will get any joy from this referee under those circumstances. I could be wrong as I don't know the rulings etc. but it doesn't look very promising does it?

[richyspireite]

Obviously its not great in the circumstances to see a player crying, but i was delighted with kovacs response when he got sent off, as it shows hes got 100% commitment to the club, few to many players show true emotions nowadays. Regarding folan, i thought he was absolutely fantastic when he came on and could of potentially won us the game with his drive and determination.

[Tez CFC]

Meden Blue, on Feb 18 2006, 06:04 PM, said:

arnt appeals based on what type of view the ref had. if he writes in his report that he had a clear view of it then we wont win it. if he says he doesnt feel confident he had a 100% view of it and feels there mite be a chance he got it wrong the fa can step in. i think

If this happens, he looks worse, because if there is any doubt, it is NOT a penalty, let alone a sending off!

[ooooh rodney rodney]

Tez CFC, on Feb 18 2006, 06:26 PM, said:

If this happens, he looks worse, because if there is any doubt, it is NOT a penalty, let alone a sending off!

A very POOR decision on both counts which unfortunately teams at the top tend to get.

[stu from town]

ooooh rodney rodney, on Feb 18 2006, 06:28 PM, said:

A very POOR decision on both counts which unfortunately teams at the top tend to get.

Before the penalty was given, at the start of the move one of there players was 2 to 3 yards offside bang under the linesmans nose he didnt flag and the rest is history as they say