Bob's Board: conspiracy theories - Bob's Board

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

conspiracy theories

#1 User is offline   Wooden Spoon 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44,168
  • Joined: 07-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 February 2006 - 12:47 PM

there is no conspiracy.

what would the aim of a conspiracy be?

to suggest that the board(s)are in together with some bizarre plot to keep the club at the 3rd tier of english footy, is utter tripe. what would be the point?

to suggest that the manager is in a conspiracy with the board(s) to aviod promotion is mindless garbage.worse, mind numbing garbage.

to suggest the stay away fans are conspiring to keep the club at the 3rd tier is utter tripe. how anyone can think this is beyond me.

what sort of twisted thinking process comes up with such rediculous ideas?

its bl**dy obvious. we are not quite good enough to go up as we dont have enough quality in depth in all areas of the squad. cover is ok, but not good, certainly up front. that is down to a lack funds. simple as.four quality forwards cost more than we can afford. only an idiot would believe otherwise.

the board will not gamble with money the club doesn`t have. i personally am pleased about that. does that make me a co-conspiritor too?

give it a rest. we are having a good season, by recent standards. better than anything for 8 years.

conspiracy. unbelievable.
A new hope.
0

#2 User is offline   lubic 

  • Reserve Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,362
  • Joined: 06-June 05

Posted 16 February 2006 - 01:35 PM

I'm still waiting to have this explained to me. I fear it will be a long wait.
0

#3 User is offline   sophocles 

  • Key Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,569
  • Joined: 07-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pilsley
  • Interests:Sport, especially football. Theatre, literature, eating, drinking (esp. real ale).

Posted 16 February 2006 - 07:53 PM

View PostPaul, on Feb 16 2006, 01:35 PM, said:

I'm still waiting to have this explained to me. I fear it will be a long wait.


Paul, did you listen to similar drivel from a demented caller on Peak last night? There has obviously been a mass breakout from some institution for the deranged, and while I do feel sorry for them, I think they should just be ignored; they will probably be recaptured soon.
0

#4 Guest_MP-Spire_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 16 February 2006 - 08:01 PM

All this is nothing more than a load of codswallop, I think some people are mistaking conspiracy with financial control. I would have liked to have seen some experienced bodies brought in, we haven't had them and only Roy and the Board know if he's been fully backed in the transfer market, I suspect Roy wasn't given the go ahead to bring in his top targets.
0

#5 User is offline   lubic 

  • Reserve Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,362
  • Joined: 06-June 05

Posted 16 February 2006 - 08:03 PM

View Postsophocles, on Feb 16 2006, 08:53 PM, said:

Paul, did you listen to similar drivel from a demented caller on Peak last night? There has obviously been a mass breakout from some institution for the deranged, and while I do feel sorry for them, I think they should just be ignored; they will probably be recaptured soon.


'Unfortunately', Peak's signal doesn't stretch to Paris so no, I didn't. I really wish someone would at least try to justify it; it's getting quite dangerous. It's clearly absurd and noone has come up with any possible reason why it might be true but if you throw enough mud some of it will stick and it's obviously starting to judging by the fact that the idea is spreading.
0

#6 User is offline   lubic 

  • Reserve Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,362
  • Joined: 06-June 05

Posted 16 February 2006 - 09:55 PM

Sorry to do this, but I'm pushing all the threads I can find from the last few days where the conspiracy is mentioned but not fully explained. I'm doing it in the hope that the people who believe it will explain it. If not, hopefully it will make them look silly.
0

#7 User is offline   InkySpireite 

  • Key Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members with edit own post
  • Posts: 5,227
  • Joined: 07-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Inkersall

Posted 16 February 2006 - 10:11 PM

View PostPaul, on Feb 16 2006, 09:55 PM, said:

Sorry to do this, but I'm pushing all the threads I can find from the last few days where the conspiracy is mentioned but not fully explained. I'm doing it in the hope that the people who believe it will explain it. If not, hopefully it will make them look silly.

have they not achieved that already?

And don't lie, you just want to rack your number of posts up... :P

This post has been edited by InkySpireite: 16 February 2006 - 10:14 PM

Spireite till I die...
0

#8 User is offline   sophocles 

  • Key Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,569
  • Joined: 07-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pilsley
  • Interests:Sport, especially football. Theatre, literature, eating, drinking (esp. real ale).

Posted 17 February 2006 - 01:43 PM

View PostPaul, on Feb 16 2006, 08:03 PM, said:

'Unfortunately', Peak's signal doesn't stretch to Paris so no, I didn't. I really wish someone would at least try to justify it; it's getting quite dangerous. It's clearly absurd and noone has come up with any possible reason why it might be true but if you throw enough mud some of it will stick and it's obviously starting to judging by the fact that the idea is spreading.


Peak's signal struggles to get past Hasland, never mind Paris, and I note your interesting use of apostrophes with the word 'unfortunately'. On a serious note I do think you're right about the constant whingeing comments damaging the club - they aren't going to do a lot to boost our attendance figures are they?
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users