[Walton Spireite]

I would hazard a guess that Marc Richards wage is circa £3,500 per week the equivalent of half the Accrington' Stanley side.

[spireitetoo]

Walton Spireite, on 18 September 2012 - 07:43 PM, said:

I would hazard a guess that Marc Richards wage is circa £3,500 per week the equivalent of half the Accrington' Stanley side.

Yawn

[Search & Destroy]

You'd say AS starting 11 are on £500 a week?

[Wooden Spoon]

Walton Spireite, on 18 September 2012 - 07:43 PM, said:

I would hazard a guess that Marc Richards wage is circa £3,500 per week the equivalent of half the Accrington' Stanley side.

I doubt its over 3k a week TBH

[Walton Spireite]

spireitetoo, on 18 September 2012 - 07:45 PM, said:

Yawn

But true

[Elmer Fudd's Thick Lip]

Walton Spireite, on 18 September 2012 - 07:43 PM, said:

I would hazard a guess that Marc Richards wage is circa £3,500 per week the equivalent of half the Accrington' Stanley side.

Thanks.

I would hazard a guess that although both in L2, CFC are traditionally a much bigger club than, the likeable and over achieving AS, so it's entirely plausible. (He's not on 3.5k btw).

Which begs the question......

What's your point??

Nippy tonight eh?

[isleaiw]

Walton Spireite, on 18 September 2012 - 07:43 PM, said:

I would hazard a guess that Marc Richards wage is circa £3,500 per week the equivalent of half the Accrington' Stanley side.

Can you put a disclaimer in title that thread contains guesswork and rubbish?

I imagine half on Stanley side earn overa grand a week so I make that 5.5k or probably double MRs wage...... But like you I am guessing too!

Remind me again, are we not winning whilst you type this?

Ian

[SamosBlue]

Walton Spireite, on 18 September 2012 - 07:43 PM, said:

I would hazard a guess that Marc Richards wage is circa £3,500 per week the equivalent of half the Accrington' Stanley side.

Didn't listen to the game due to work but would it be fair to say that whatever he is on per week (and I'm sure that it is isn't the equivalent of the entire Accrington XI) we should be trying to attract players who demand a decent return for their talents? Or should we be just looking out for bargain basement players?

[Ernie Ernie Ernie]

Walton Spireite, on 18 September 2012 - 07:43 PM, said:

I would hazard a guess that Marc Richards wage is circa £3,500 per week the equivalent of half the Accrington' Stanley side.

Look on the bright side, if he is injured and with the cold weather coming, you will hardly ever have to watch him play

Walton Spireite, on 18 September 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:

But true

If it is true why are you "hazarding a guess"?

[Spire Power]

Walton Spireite, on 18 September 2012 - 07:43 PM, said:

I would hazard a guess that Marc Richards wage is circa £3,500 per week the equivalent of half the Accrington' Stanley side.

£2700 i hear

[Mr Mercury]

Another attention seeker at work, hence the comment regarding "off to watch Real Madrid V Man City", like Ernie pointed out its cold getting so he won't have to bother for long.

[RPL42YEARS]

isleaiw, on 18 September 2012 - 07:49 PM, said:

Can you put a disclaimer in title that thread contains guesswork and rubbish?

I imagine half on Stanley side earn overa grand a week so I make that 5.5k or probably double MRs wage...... But like you I am guessing too!

Remind me again, are we not winning whilst you type this?

Ian

And remind me which team played the other one off the park tonight?

RPL

[Johnnyspireite7]

RPL42YEARS, on 18 September 2012 - 10:21 PM, said:

And remind me which team played the other one off the park tonight?

RPL

Considering the final score was 4-3 to us, I'd say it was us!

[Bonnyman]

Johnnyspireite7, on 19 September 2012 - 07:24 AM, said:

Considering the final score was 4-3 to us, I'd say it was us!

johnny you have said on another thread you understand football in an argument against dema...dont undermine yourself by letting the score indicate a true reflection of the quality of both sides,we had a legend playing for us that made the difference,yet again sir jack bails cfc out the mire,we are still relying on a 37 year old man because the rest of the squad is as sterile and unimaginative as it can get.

[dim view]

bonnyman, on 19 September 2012 - 07:29 AM, said:

the rest of the squad is as sterile and unimaginative as it can get.

They hit the bar, then we should have been 3 nil up, then our goalie handed 'em 3 goals. Then we scored from a set piece.
...so I 'm not into the sterile bit, but I agree about the unimaginative bit. If 2 players, Westcarr and Drew, are on the night completely unable to produce anything constructive from those very important positions then it's always going to be a struggle against any opposition. Indeed, it was their fullbacks that were the stars, supporting the attacks without fear and creating the extra possession in midfield and attack.
Unlike most folk, I thought Trotts and Hird did well defensively. Ok, they got themselves in big trouble trying silly passes, but I can't remember our goalie having much else to save, which is fortunate.

[Ernie Ernie Ernie]

Iyru

bonnyman, on 19 September 2012 - 07:29 AM, said:

johnny you have said on another thread you understand football in an argument against dema...dont undermine yourself by letting the score indicate a true reflection of the quality of both sides,we had a legend playing for us that made the difference,yet again sir jack bails cfc out the mire,we are still relying on a 37 year old man because the rest of the squad is as sterile and unimaginative as it can get.

If we choose to have a legend in the squad then its our choice and we shouldn't apologise for it or say we are relying on him. He is an integral part of the squad. We can all easily berate what is missing from the squad but if we as a club have top loaded with quality then we shouldn't moan when it comes off.

Accy were very good but lacked any quality up front where it matters. Different budgets, different priorities. Last night we were lucky but you can't say we weren't due some.

[Johnnyspireite7]

bonnyman, on 19 September 2012 - 07:29 AM, said:

johnny you have said on another thread you understand football in an argument against dema...dont undermine yourself by letting the score indicate a true reflection of the quality of both sides,we had a legend playing for us that made the difference,yet again sir jack bails cfc out the mire,we are still relying on a 37 year old man because the rest of the squad is as sterile and unimaginative as it can get.

No I haven't, I think you are confusing me with johnnythespireite. I don't have arguments with Dema. Now R2D2 on the other hand................