money for new players or the sack for ricco and co?
#1
Posted 07 January 2009 - 09:39 PM
#2
Posted 07 January 2009 - 09:41 PM
SUPA JACK LESTER WILL MAKE YOU LOOK S..TE
#3
Posted 07 January 2009 - 09:42 PM
So no. I hope.
#5
Posted 07 January 2009 - 09:45 PM
Spired, on Jan 7 2009, 09:45 PM, said:
So no. I hope.
I LOVE you optimism....and I HOPE beyond HOPE you are right.
I used to be so PROUD to be a Spireite Im gradually losing my will....and that is so wrong.
SUPA JACK LESTER WILL MAKE YOU LOOK S..TE
#6
Posted 07 January 2009 - 09:48 PM
Haslandspireite, on Jan 7 2009, 10:48 PM, said:
I used to be so PROUD to be a Spireite Im gradually losing my will....and that is so wrong.
ita as simple as this under a proper manager and backroom team the players will be fitter more proffesional and will play to their potential,if they dont they will be fc uked off straight away
#8
Posted 07 January 2009 - 09:51 PM
SUPA JACK LESTER WILL MAKE YOU LOOK S..TE
#9
Posted 07 January 2009 - 09:56 PM
spireiteblue, on Jan 7 2009, 09:51 PM, said:
MAkes ma laugh when people say Currie is "idle"
Do you think he should play like Niven when he's out of possession?
He's not been played consistantly and when he has he has a case to argue that he hasn't been half that bad. A great ball from him set our only goal up at Grimsby (didn't go but check spireites world)...he is a classy player, not a grafter. And not lazy. More in a team that's playing horribly for his style of play.
As for Austin...PLEASE get off his back. He rarely lets anyone past him and he for me does a great job. Page on the other hand is a disappointment. But all 3 could and i think 2 at least of the 3 would improve under a new gaffer.
#10 Guest_MP-Spire_*
Posted 07 January 2009 - 10:03 PM
Spired, on Jan 7 2009, 09:59 PM, said:
Do you think he should play like Niven when he's out of possession?
He's not been played consistantly and when he has he has a case to argue that he hasn't been half that bad. A great ball from him set our only goal up at Grimsby (didn't go but check spireites world)...he is a classy player, not a grafter. And not lazy. More in a team that's playing horribly for his style of play.
As for Austin...PLEASE get off his back. He rarely lets anyone past him and he for me does a great job. Page on the other hand is a disappointment. But all 3 could and i think 2 at least of the 3 would improve under a new gaffer.
Currie should be seen as a pivot point, with:-
A forward dropping off his man.
A central midfielder making some runs into the box.
An attacking full back
Oh and a target man wouldn't go amiss.
This post has been edited by MP-Spire: 07 January 2009 - 10:05 PM
#11 Guest_spireiteblue_*
Posted 07 January 2009 - 10:03 PM
Spired, on Jan 7 2009, 09:59 PM, said:
Do you think he should play like Niven when he's out of possession?
He's not been played consistantly and when he has he has a case to argue that he hasn't been half that bad. A great ball from him set our only goal up at Grimsby (didn't go but check spireites world)...he is a classy player, not a grafter. And not lazy. More in a team that's playing horribly for his style of play.
As for Austin...PLEASE get off his back. He rarely lets anyone past him and he for me does a great job. Page on the other hand is a disappointment. But all 3 could and i think 2 at least of the 3 would improve under a new gaffer.
I think Curry should wake up now and start earning his money....
#12
Posted 07 January 2009 - 10:10 PM
spireiteblue, on Jan 7 2009, 09:51 PM, said:
I couldn't agree more. From what i've seen of page he's only interested in the money!!. Must admit that i've not been a regular this season, but what i have seen he's got no leadership about him and doesn't seem interested. I've not seen us this weak at back for long time, and can't remember us concede goals from set pieces at the rate we have this season. Surley at the level he's played he should be able to organise defending a set piece

#13
Posted 07 January 2009 - 10:12 PM
spireiteblue, on Jan 7 2009, 11:06 PM, said:
at the end of the day curry is a victim of being in the wrong team,he is a luxury player whos finest asset is putting quality in from out wide,well playing in a team that has small forwards and pumps the ball up to them every second as well as being unable to pass aint going to help him,richardson knew this when he signed him,he simply hadnt got the players to accomadate curry
#14
Posted 07 January 2009 - 10:35 PM