Bob's Board: The Signing Of Jack Lester - Bob's Board

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Signing Of Jack Lester

#21 User is offline   Bankrobber 

  • 83 goals
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,892
  • Joined: 06-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rawcliffe, East Yorkshire
  • Interests:Arctic Sheets and Fields of Wheat

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:14 PM

Rico was on record as saying offering a 3 yr deal to him then was a no brainer, as they'd have offered him a 2 yr deal if he was a year older. I"m not saying Rico was the be all and end all of the deal....but you have to give him some credit for his foresight.
The greatest miscarriage of justice since my case against the producers of the Never Ending Story
0

#22 User is offline   DIFH 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 39,339
  • Joined: 26-October 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Can be found mainly in Sheffield these days lol

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:17 PM

View PostMDCCCLXVI, on 14 December 2012 - 03:49 PM, said:

Yeah, but there're always those peddling denial, persuing an agenda, or both.

Thankfully, as has been the case with so many issues over recent times, the individuals in question have been exposed.



How do we see who's dishing the minus's anyone?
God I hate this league.
0

#23 User is offline   Goku 

  • Super Saiyan and saviour of the universe
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36,943
  • Joined: 10-August 07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:20 PM

View PostDave In Footie Heaven, on 14 December 2012 - 10:17 PM, said:

How do we see who's dishing the minus's anyone?


You don't, only mods can see that.
0

#24 User is offline   Wooden Spoon 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44,217
  • Joined: 07-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 December 2012 - 09:30 AM

View PostBankrobber, on 14 December 2012 - 10:14 PM, said:

Rico was on record as saying offering a 3 yr deal to him then was a no brainer, as they'd have offered him a 2 yr deal if he was a year older. I"m not saying Rico was the be all and end all of the deal....but you have to give him some credit for his foresight.


Maybe the 3 year deal and higher goals/win bonus was the only way we could have met Lester's demands. I wouldn't say its foresight at all, but any club at our level would bend over backwards to make a deal for a 31 yr old Jack Lester.
A new hope.
0

#25 User is offline   Paul Fisher 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,532
  • Joined: 08-June 05
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 15 December 2012 - 09:33 AM

But they didn't though did they?
0

#26 User is offline   Wooden Spoon 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44,217
  • Joined: 07-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 December 2012 - 10:55 AM

View PostDarcy Sarto, on 15 December 2012 - 09:33 AM, said:

But they didn't though did they?



What are you trying to say?
A new hope.
0

#27 User is offline   moondog 

  • Legend
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 27,062
  • Joined: 09-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield

Posted 15 December 2012 - 10:59 AM

the fact that Jack contacted us, makes him even more of a legend in my eyes as does the fact he'd like to stay in some capacity when he hangs his boots up
0

#28 User is offline   Paul Fisher 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,532
  • Joined: 08-June 05
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 15 December 2012 - 11:05 AM

View Postdeath, on 15 December 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:

What are you trying to say?


My point being that we acted on jack contacting us and we didn't turn it down thank god. Other clubs were not that quick on the uptake.
0

#29 User is offline   Spire1986 

  • Reserve Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,145
  • Joined: 16-March 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield

Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:38 PM

We have Jack Lester. WHY ARE WE NOT USING HIM. Even at 37 he is twice the player Richards is. Use them together ffs.
"Lest(er) we forget"
0

#30 User is offline   Wooden Spoon 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 44,217
  • Joined: 07-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 December 2012 - 03:41 PM

View PostDarcy Sarto, on 15 December 2012 - 11:05 AM, said:

My point being that we acted on jack contacting us and we didn't turn it down thank god. Other clubs were not that quick on the uptake.


There wasnt any uptake for the other clubs to act upon.

He doesnt have an agent, so its not as if he was being hawked around and we had competition for his signature.

He approached us, we gave him a deal that matched what he wanted. End of.
A new hope.
0

#31 User is offline   Search & Destroy 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members with edit own post
  • Posts: 16,290
  • Joined: 05-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:2000 metres lower than I?d prefer
  • Interests:Hiking, biking and generally being outdoors

Posted 15 December 2012 - 05:29 PM

View PostSpire1986, on 15 December 2012 - 03:38 PM, said:

We have Jack Lester. WHY ARE WE NOT USING HIM. Even at 37 he is twice the player Richards is. Use them together ffs.




Are you serious? You're not are you? Oh God, you are.
JRID
0

#32 User is offline   Spire1986 

  • Reserve Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,145
  • Joined: 16-March 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield

Posted 15 December 2012 - 05:41 PM

Yes i am serious. Richards can finish but lacks creativity. This 1 up front will soon wear thin. We have Lester for a limited amount of time. We have never had a better player. Flippin use him before hes gone.

This post has been edited by Spire1986: 15 December 2012 - 05:43 PM

"Lest(er) we forget"
2

#33 User is offline   Skywalker 

  • Key Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,106
  • Joined: 27-April 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Newbold

Posted 15 December 2012 - 05:58 PM

View PostSpire1986, on 15 December 2012 - 05:41 PM, said:

Yes i am serious. Richards can finish but lacks creativity. This 1 up front will soon wear thin. We have Lester for a limited amount of time. We have never had a better player. Flippin use him before hes gone.

Do you think the formation deployed under Paul Cook is defensive?
If only....
0

#34 User is offline   Spire1986 

  • Reserve Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,145
  • Joined: 16-March 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield

Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:10 PM

Its not attacking. He will have a honeymoon period.We were not attacking enough for a team at home.

Its not attacking. He will have a honeymoon period.We were not attacking enough for a team at home.
"Lest(er) we forget"
0

#35 User is offline   Paul Fisher 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,532
  • Joined: 08-June 05
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:49 PM

View Postdeath, on 15 December 2012 - 03:41 PM, said:

There wasnt any uptake for the other clubs to act upon.

He doesnt have an agent, so its not as if he was being hawked around and we had competition for his signature.

He approached us, we gave him a deal that matched what he wanted. End of.


Oh well if you put "end of" at the finish, that means I can't reply, ah well, fat use you would be in the debating society
0

#36 User is offline   Elmer Fudd's Thick Lip 

  • The Ayatollah
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,701
  • Joined: 09-May 11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dave's top lip
  • Interests:Big fan of Terry Thomas and Fu Manchu.

    Partial to the odd beerd!!

Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:56 PM

View PostSpire1986, on 15 December 2012 - 06:10 PM, said:

Its not attacking. He will have a honeymoon period.We were not attacking enough for a team at home.

Its not attacking. He will have a honeymoon period.We were not attacking enough for a team at home.

Eyes Wide.....

























SHUT!

:rolleyes:
Mug?? Being wrong never gets boring!
2

#37 User is offline   KevoBMMD 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,884
  • Joined: 09-November 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Limes

Posted 15 December 2012 - 07:01 PM

View PostSpire1986, on 15 December 2012 - 06:10 PM, said:

Its not attacking. He will have a honeymoon period.We were not attacking enough for a team at home.

Its not attacking. He will have a honeymoon period.We were not attacking enough for a team at home.


Check the Match Stats I think they disagree.

16 Attempts with 7 on target

13 Corners


Hit the Post on atleast 2 occasions if not 3................
0

#38 User is offline   ArcticSpireite 

  • Reserve Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,014
  • Joined: 21-July 12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chezvegas

Posted 15 December 2012 - 07:06 PM

View PostKevoBMMD, on 15 December 2012 - 07:01 PM, said:

Check the Match Stats I think they disagree.

16 Attempts with 7 on target

13 Corners


Hit the Post on atleast 2 occasions if not 3................


I can see where he's coming from. 4-5-1 (in my opinion) is boring, especially at home. Look at us in the first half, we were woeful. 4-5-1 invites pressure and that's never good. We have two of the best strikers in the division with Richards and Lester, so why on Earth would anyone even begin to think about only playing one of them? Against Accrington those two were absolutely sublime, they were the only players who performed on the night and those two alone got us the victory that day. Consequently Cook should know first hand that if he plays them together we'll be virtually unbeatable.
Happiness is like a cake. Have too much; and you get sick of it.
0

#39 User is offline   Skywalker 

  • Key Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,106
  • Joined: 27-April 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Newbold

Posted 15 December 2012 - 07:36 PM

View PostArcticSpireite, on 15 December 2012 - 07:06 PM, said:

I can see where he's coming from. 4-5-1 (in my opinion) is boring, especially at home. Look at us in the first half, we were woeful. 4-5-1 invites pressure and that's never good. We have two of the best strikers in the division with Richards and Lester, so why on Earth would anyone even begin to think about only playing one of them? Against Accrington those two were absolutely sublime, they were the only players who performed on the night and those two alone got us the victory that day. Consequently Cook should know first hand that if he plays them together we'll be virtually unbeatable.

I certainly don’t find it boring.
If only....
0

#40 User is offline   Goku 

  • Super Saiyan and saviour of the universe
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36,943
  • Joined: 10-August 07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 December 2012 - 07:38 PM

We didn't seem to find it boring when we were beating Cheltenham 4-1.
0

Share this topic:


  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users