[The Earl of Chesterfield]

freelander2, on 19 September 2012 - 06:57 PM, said:

Unconvinced by Tommy & the lads or unconvinced by the Boards' decision making this year?

I think the average punters take things pretty much at face value, Mike - if they're happy with what they're watching they'll return; if not?

Four thousand three hundred.

But then it's decisions by the Board that ultimately decide what those punters watch.

This post has been edited by MDCCCLXVI: 19 September 2012 - 07:14 PM

[Guest_freelander2_*]

MDCCCLXVI, on 19 September 2012 - 07:13 PM, said:

I think the average punters take things pretty much at face value, Mike - if they're happy with what they're watching they'll return; if not?

Four thousand three hundred.

But then it's decisions by the Board that ultimately decide what those punters watch.

I'm still shaking my head that DA publicly backed JS, allowed him to bring players in during the summer and then dismissed him after a few weeks of the season!

You're not telling me that these issues weren't known last season or the season before that. From the outside looking in, it looks like we've got shut of Sheridan on the cheap possibly at the expense of our season.

[dim view]

freelander2, on 19 September 2012 - 07:30 PM, said:

You're not telling me that these issues weren't known last season or the season before that.

a 100% start to the season would have seen all the issues put on the back burner. DA needed that start in order to support his man.