[fishini]

IMO Roy was right in bringing Blathers on and forming a proper recognised back 4 but it should have been Allot that made way for him, Hursty was creating all sorts of problems for them and could have been match winner, these sort of decisions of Roy's baffles me

[sophocles]

fishini, on Feb 18 2006, 07:31 PM, said:

IMO Roy was right in bringing Blathers on and forming a proper recognised back 4 but it should have been Allot that made way for him, Hursty was creating all sorts of problems for them and could have been match winner, these sort of decisions of Roy's baffles me

Thank God he's the manager then, and not you. The thinking was that a taller central attacker was needed, and it worked because Caleb DID cause them all sorts of problems and laid on Niven's goal with some brilliant skill and strength. Why don't you take the occasional break from being negative and give roy and the lads some credit for an absolutely magnificent display of skill and team spirit that made the league leaders look ordinary?

[fishini]

sophocles, on Feb 18 2006, 07:36 PM, said:

Thank God he's the manager then, and not you. The thinking was that a taller central attacker was needed, and it worked because Caleb DID cause them all sorts of problems and laid on Niven's goal with some brilliant skill and strength. Why don't you take the occasional break from being negative and give roy and the lads some credit for an absolutely magnificent display of skill and team spirit that made the league leaders look ordinary?

What are you rambling on about? been on the urine? where did I say anything about Folan? I said Allot should have made way for Blathers did I not? Since when has Blathers been a central attacker? You have been on the funny mushrooms again?

[h again]

fishini, on Feb 18 2006, 07:52 PM, said:

What are you rambling on about? been on the urine? where did I say anything about Folan? I said Allot should have made way for Blathers did I not? Since when has Blathers been a central attacker? You have been on the funny mushrooms again?

You really are unable to sustain even the simplest argument, aren't you? Blathers came on to allow Allott to move forward to strengthen midfield. Hurst was playing reasonably well but can't run the midfield like Allott, and when you're a man short a pure wing player like Hurst is a luxury.

[Mikey]

Luxury Hursty, MY bottom.

Whats the best for of defense, oh yes, ATTTACK!

Thant what Hursty provides!

Taking him off threww the game, Roy is on the fiddle!

[InkySpireite]

cfcscott153, on Feb 18 2006, 06:01 PM, said:

- Why does McFarland insist on Allot being on the pitch, today he has played right wing, right back and then replaced hursty on the left wing, would he still play if he nad two broken legs ??

- Why does McFarland seem to take off our best players in the game. Eg, Larkin/Hurst today and wednesday just for example but he seems to do this every game

- On a better note it was a good game today and the lads gave it their all

Talk about support, look at your signature... 'going up, you're having a laugh'... F**k off to Field Mill.

We're eigth, how many would have took that in August?

[Wooden Spoon]

Mikey, on Feb 19 2006, 01:07 AM, said:

Taking him off threww the game, Roy is on the fiddle!

what planet are you on?

[lubic]

death, on Feb 19 2006, 12:26 PM, said:

what planet are you on?

I feel like I'm in a scene from Dawn of the Dead. They're multiplying I tell ya!

[Wooden Spoon]

Paul, on Feb 19 2006, 11:28 AM, said:

I feel like I'm in a scene from Dawn of the Dead. They're multiplying I tell ya!

[sophocles]

InkySpireite, on Feb 19 2006, 01:16 AM, said:

Talk about support, look at your signature... 'going up, you're having a laugh'... F**k off to Field Mill.

We're eigth, how many would have took that in August?

Well said Inky.