[Arnold Tabbs]

How do they justify putting that photo of a young girl giving the goalie a V sign on their national website? She is only a child and exposing her to public humiliation like this is typical of the hypocrisy which is so rampant in the Netherworld inhabited by the gutter press. Little girls are either angels or demons with nothing in between, while young lads are either heroes or louts. And for Chesterfield now read Northern savages.

Hit them where it hurts, fellow Spireites. Join Liverpool fans in boycotting this horrible rag.

[JonB]

Child or not....her best way of avoiding the national press was to have not been there in the first place committing a criminal offence. Put yourself in those positions and to be honest you deserve all you get.

[martatcross]

because she is showing behaviour of a hooligan despite which you cannot see her face the paper have every right to show people doing things that are anti social

[Guest_freelander2_*]

animal, on 27 April 2011 - 07:54 AM, said:

How do they justify putting that photo of a young girl giving the goalie a V sign on their national website? She is only a child and exposing her to public humiliation like this is typical of the hypocrisy which is so rampant in the Netherworld inhabited by the gutter press. Little girls are either angels or demons with nothing in between, while young lads are either heroes or louts. And for Chesterfield now read Northern savages.

Hit them where it hurts, fellow Spireites. Join Liverpool fans in boycotting this horrible rag.

I've got a feeling you will be on your own.

[JonB]

freelander2, on 27 April 2011 - 07:58 AM, said:

I've got a feeling you will be on your own.

I boycott it but only on the basis its generally a load of crap....i wont be doing it just cos someone reckons they shouldnt be showing a picture of some young lass dragging our name through the mud!

[Guest_freelander2_*]

JonB, on 27 April 2011 - 08:02 AM, said:

I boycott it but only on the basis its generally a load of crap....i wont be doing it just cos someone reckons they shouldnt be showing a picture of some young lass dragging our name through the mud!

Agreed.

[cfcblues]

How many have never bought a copy of the mirror ever again? I certainly haven't, this is the same kind of thing.

Press/FA don't like town, end of.

[JonB]

cfcblues, on 27 April 2011 - 08:14 AM, said:

How many have never bought a copy of the mirror ever again? I certainly haven't, this is the same kind of thing.

Press/FA don't like town, end of.

At the end of the day these little numpties made it B****Y easy for them to do it!!

[clarevoyant.]

Would anyone with a modicum of sense admit to reading it

[Blueprint]

If the young girl wasn't sticking v signs up at their keeper and was acting like an angel, or even just abiding by the the football league rules and staying off the pitch she wouldn't have been in the paper. She's obviously not an angel given her actions and where she is making them. Is she a demon, well yes in the eyes of the proper supporter who goes to games to watch the team they support do well and doesn't go to cause trouble. As for young lads being heroes or louts, you can't tell me that the lads who got in the face of their keeper were heroes.

They deserve what they get, and if national humiliation is the only way the youth of today will start to realise they need to behave at games, and keep of the pitch then so be it. We can't afford to be wasting our hard earned money on fines due to our young supporters being unable to control there feet and their actions. Although we have made much more money this season than we ever did at Saltergate we don't have money to throw away on stupid things like fines.

[calvin plummers socks]

She's a piece of trash who should be givn as much abuse as possible:-o

Those Liverpool fans just stopped reading the sun as it highlighted the truth?
They're all loveable scousers don't forget and wouldn't possibly do anything wrong, it's all the police's fault .......zzzzzz

[spireitetoo]

calvin plummers socks, on 27 April 2011 - 08:40 AM, said:

She's a piece of trash who should be givn as much abuse as possible:-o

Those Liverpool fans just stopped reading the sun as it highlighted the truth?
They're all loveable scousers don't forget and wouldn't possibly do anything wrong, it's all the police's fault .......zzzzzz

don't go there!!!

[clarevoyant.]

Mark Jones, on 27 April 2011 - 08:43 AM, said:

The Sun.......

Who in there right minds read this rag anyway. I wouldn't waste the 25p or whatever it is to purchase it. Its crap!

As for the girl, she reaps what she sows, just like the young lad. They knew they were doing wrong and have to suffer the consequences, its life.

(Still wish I had took the photo though!)

Well you will have to resort to the professional methods that the likes of the Sun have adopted in the past and go out and induce someone to commit an offence allegedly so you can record it

[Spire1986]

animal, on 27 April 2011 - 07:54 AM, said:

How do they justify putting that photo of a young girl giving the goalie a V sign on their national website? She is only a child and exposing her to public humiliation like this is typical of the hypocrisy which is so rampant in the Netherworld inhabited by the gutter press. Little girls are either angels or demons with nothing in between, while young lads are either heroes or louts. And for Chesterfield now read Northern savages.

Hit them where it hurts, fellow Spireites. Join Liverpool fans in boycotting this horrible rag.

Its wet opinions like this that are the reason kids, and adults, get away with their actions.

Never mind protecting her. She needs embarrasing to the point where she never does it again. If I was her Dad she would be thrashed within an inch of her life and then made to write a letter of apology to him.

[spireitetoo]

Spire1986, on 27 April 2011 - 09:03 AM, said:

Its wet opinions like this that are the reason kids, and adults, get away with their actions.

Never mind protecting her. She needs embarrasing to the point where she never does it again. If I was her Dad she would be thrashed within an inch of her life and then made to write a letter of apology to him.

even as a parent, you cannot do that anymore, to raise your hand to a child even your own is seen as child cruelty/abuse and you would end up doing a little bird,

and here lieth the problem with the youngsters of today,(jeez i sound like my old man, ** shakes head** must be getting old lol)

[clarevoyant.]

spireitetoo, on 27 April 2011 - 09:08 AM, said:

even as a parent, you cannot do that anymore, to raise your hand to a child even your own is seen as child cruelty/abuse and you would end up doing a little bird,

and here lieth the problem with the youngsters of today,(jeez i sound like my old man, ** shakes head** must be getting old lol)

It's a pity more people don't realise this, especially the do gooders who advocated this in the first place including posters on here who tried to find some pitiful physiological reason for the actions of Mondays offenders

[Spire1986]

spireitetoo, on 27 April 2011 - 09:08 AM, said:

even as a parent, you cannot do that anymore, to raise your hand to a child even your own is seen as child cruelty/abuse and you would end up doing a little bird,

and here lieth the problem with the youngsters of today,(jeez i sound like my old man, ** shakes head** must be getting old lol)

Its not illegal to give your child a crack. Use it sensibly yeah, but this would warrant it for me.

[Jud]

Spire1986, on 27 April 2011 - 09:03 AM, said:

Its wet opinions like this that are the reason kids, and adults, get away with their actions.

Never mind protecting her. She needs embarrasing to the point where she never does it again. If I was her Dad she would be thrashed within an inch of her life and then made to write a letter of apology to him.

You're right, god, not thrashing a child is sooooooooooo wet! Earlier today I kicked the face of a kitten, because I'm completely dry.

[spireitetoo]

Spire1986, on 27 April 2011 - 09:15 AM, said:

Its not illegal to give your child a crack. Use it sensibly yeah, but this would warrant it for me.

i'd check with social services, them bstrds will snatch your kids first then ask questions later.