[Spireite-Karl]

Blackpool are ready to accept Derby's offer of £750,000 (althought it could be up to a million) for Shaun Barker, we have a 25% sell-on-fee

Let's just say £190,000

15% of Lee Williamson moving to Sheffield Utd for £500k

£85,000

Then if Reid goes, that's more, Colchester have been rumoured to be putting in a £350,000 bid

£350,000


From a miller of the FL forum

How do they do it?

[azul]

Spireite-Karl, on Jul 11 2009, 12:42 PM, said:

Blackpool are ready to accept Derby's offer of £750,000 (althought it could be up to a million) for Shaun Barker, we have a 25% sell-on-fee

Let's just say £190,000

15% of Lee Williamson moving to Sheffield Utd for £500k

£85,000

Then if Reid goes, that's more, Colchester have been rumoured to be putting in a £350,000 bid

£350,000


From a miller of the FL forum

How do they do it?

By developin players so they become assets, then manage the assets correctly (contracts) and when disposing of the assets, do it correctly (sell on clauses).

Get fault them for that, just all the otherstuff they get up to.

By developin players so they become assets, then manage the assets correctly (contracts) and when disposing of the assets, do it correctly (sell on clauses).

Get fault them for that, just all the otherstuff they get up to.

[Spireite-Karl]

azul, on Jul 11 2009, 01:15 PM, said:

By developin players so they become assets, then manage the assets correctly (contracts) and when disposing of the assets, do it correctly (sell on clauses).

Get fault them for that, just all the otherstuff they get up to.

Would they'd have had these assets in the first place if it wasn't for them overspending?

[Ernie Ernie Ernie]

Spireite-Karl, on Jul 11 2009, 01:42 PM, said:

Would they'd have had these assets in the first place if it wasn't for them overspending?

As those sales and contracts related to the period under another administartion any sell on proceeds should go to the B****Y creditors of that adminsistration

[DIFH]

Spireite-Karl, on Jul 11 2009, 12:42 PM, said:

Blackpool are ready to accept Derby's offer of £750,000 (althought it could be up to a million) for Shaun Barker, we have a 25% sell-on-fee

Let's just say £190,000

15% of Lee Williamson moving to Sheffield Utd for £500k

£85,000

Then if Reid goes, that's more, Colchester have been rumoured to be putting in a £350,000 bid

£350,000


Alister Darling will be smiling but I'm not sure about Williamson - wasn't he part of the old club set up does that still apply in those circumstances.
From a miller of the FL forum

How do they do it?

[pac17]

The money will go to the new owners who don't owe any money to any creditors.

you cheaterfield fans are getting obsessed by what Rotherham are doing or not doing ,get over it

[DIFH]

pac17, on Jul 11 2009, 02:05 PM, said:

The money will go to the new owners who don't owe any money to any creditors.

you cheaterfield fans are getting obsessed by what Rotherham are doing or not doing ,get over it

It's a good job KNILLY put all this in place for you

[Ernie Ernie Ernie]

pac17, on Jul 11 2009, 02:05 PM, said:

The money will go to the new owners who don't owe any money to any creditors.
you cheaterfield fans are getting obsessed by what Rotherham are doing or not doing ,get over it

Yes that's the point!!!

Obsessed says the 6 fingered one who is always on here. God help us if you do well

[DIFH]

pac17, on Jul 11 2009, 02:05 PM, said:

The money will go to the new owners who don't owe any money to any creditors.

you cheaterfield fans are getting obsessed by what Rotherham are doing or not doing ,get over it

Talking about obsession - who keeps coming on our board ? NUMB SCULL.

[pac17]

i come on this board for a bit of banter and have a laugh at how much you spireites are obsessed with the Millers......

[kevspireites]

pac17, on Jul 11 2009, 02:05 PM, said:

The money will go to the new owners who don't owe any money to any creditors.

you cheaterfield fans are getting obsessed by what Rotherham are doing or not doing ,get over it

says a fan of a team who use administration to clear debts for a fresh start

[DIFH]

pac17, on Jul 11 2009, 02:35 PM, said:

i come on this board for a bit of banter and have a laugh at how much you spireites are obsessed with the Millers......

Here's a bit of banter mate, Rotherham lad with family working at the millers choses to join local rivals over his home town club - money not the issue, prepared to travel that little further down the M1 to play for the better club.

[Rodney's Moustache]

pac17, on Jul 11 2009, 02:05 PM, said:

The money will go to the new owners who don't owe any money to any creditors.

you cheaterfield fans are getting obsessed by what Rotherham are doing or not doing ,get over it

wasn't Darren Brown from that scruffy dump of a place called Rotherham...must be in the blood all that inter-breeding

[pac17]

dave i was talking to a member of his family the other day and shock horror guess what Rotherham never tried to sign him that's why he joined cheaterfield

rodney did you think that up all by yourself or did you need help your teacher will be pleased,pleased that you can put a sentence together......Darren Brown must have been laughing when he took over cheaterfield ,that he had taken over a club that were that thick and stupid to fall for his scams and he nearly got away with it ............

why are cheaterfield fans so jealous and obsessed with Rotherham United you have a new owner

[PositiveOmen]

pac17, on Jul 11 2009, 05:32 PM, said:

dave i was talking to a member of his family the other day and shock horror guess what Rotherham never tried to sign him that's why he joined cheaterfield

rodney did you think that up all by yourself or did you need help your teacher will be pleased,pleased that you can put a sentence together......Darren Brown must have been laughing when he took over cheaterfield ,that he had taken over a club that were that thick and stupid to fall for his scams and he nearly got away with it ............

why are cheaterfield fans so jealous and obsessed with Rotherham United you have a new owner

At least we were scammed.. You just knew you were cheating

The definition of "jealous", is that you look at something that you'd really want..

Do we want your unstable finances.. Nope
Do we want your "Where's the football.. I think it's being played somewhere over there in the distance" football ground.. Nope
Do we want to be based in one of the worst locations in England.. Nope
Do we want to be based in Porkshire fullstop.. Nope

I think the constant mentioning of Rotherscum, is that you're supposed to be up there in the league with us, yet you get away with murder.. And none of these threads will even matter when we're somewhere up there in the table, and we have to go to your "ground" and laugh in the face of someone going round with a bucket..

Goodluck for the new season

[pac17]

negative omen you really are funny :

[DIFH]

pac17, on Jul 11 2009, 05:32 PM, said:

dave i was talking to a member of his family the other day and shock horror guess what Rotherham never tried to sign him that's why he joined cheaterfield

rodney did you think that up all by yourself or did you need help your teacher will be pleased,pleased that you can put a sentence together......Darren Brown must have been laughing when he took over cheaterfield ,that he had taken over a club that were that thick and stupid to fall for his scams and he nearly got away with it ............

why are cheaterfield fans so jealous and obsessed with Rotherham United you have a new owner

Simply don't believe you.

[azul]

pac17, on Jul 11 2009, 05:32 PM, said:

why are cheaterfield fans so jealous and obsessed with Rotherham United you have a new owner

I'm with you, its beyond belief why so many on here give a toss about rotherham

[Goku]

azul, on Jul 11 2009, 06:48 PM, said:

I'm with you, its beyond belief why so many on here give a toss about rotherham

Agreed, it just gets trolls like pac on here and it negates any decent discussion.

This post has been edited by Haslandboi: 11 July 2009 - 06:44 PM

[Ernie Ernie Ernie]

Haslandboi, on Jul 11 2009, 07:56 PM, said:

Agreed, it just gets trolls like pac on here and it negates any decent discussion.

Why do you respond to him then?