WOW DIDNT EXPECT THAT!!!!
#1
Posted 03 June 2009 - 11:46 AM
#6
Posted 03 June 2009 - 12:01 PM
philmoore6, on Jun 3 2009, 01:02 PM, said:
Yes no compo needed. She's going to sign a whole new squad and then put it on expenses.
#7
Posted 03 June 2009 - 12:06 PM
Town_Fan, on Jun 3 2009, 01:04 PM, said:
i heard that the new ground is being used as her second home so we can claim back the cost of the build
#8
Posted 03 June 2009 - 01:29 PM
spireiteblue, on Jun 3 2009, 12:51 PM, said:
Then vote for a party that isnt one of the big 3 as a protest, Green party, UKIP, Monster raving etc....
#9
Posted 03 June 2009 - 01:32 PM
death, on Jun 3 2009, 02:32 PM, said:
Biggest protest vote is a non vote - voting for someone you dont want runs risk they may win, especially in current climate.
I'll be registering my protest by not registering a vote (again...)
#10
Posted 03 June 2009 - 01:36 PM
isleaiw, on Jun 3 2009, 02:35 PM, said:
I'll be registering my protest by not registering a vote (again...)
Its the european elections, so it doesnt matter. No one `wins`.
A non vote is just that.
Nothing.
Imagine the 40% or so of people who didnt vote all voted for the above mentioned smaller parties in the euro elections.... How scared would the westminster crowd be, and how quickly would this system of expenses and greedy MPs` be sorted out?
#12
Posted 03 June 2009 - 01:47 PM
death, on Jun 3 2009, 02:39 PM, said:
A non vote is just that.
Nothing.
Imagine the 40% or so of people who didnt vote all voted for the above mentioned smaller parties in the euro elections.... How scared would the westminster crowd be, and how quickly would this system of expenses and greedy MPs` be sorted out?
well, clearly the guy (or girl) who gets most votes wins....
I was referring to local elections - imagine having your council tax set by some of the "other" parties....
The Westminster crowd are only scared by losing there easy life. don't care what protest vote is registered this time. I wont waste the petrol and harm the environment going down to vote for someone i couldn't give a toss about...
Ian
#14
Posted 03 June 2009 - 03:03 PM
A man of integrity, a proven track record and who wants the very best for the people of Chesterfield.
#15
Posted 03 June 2009 - 03:25 PM
Remember that Blair won huge majorities with support from about 25% of the electorate but was able to claim a 'popular mandate' because of low turnouts - to professional politicians a non vote is conveniently interpreted as 'the voter is happy with the status quo'!
#16
Posted 03 June 2009 - 06:27 PM
spyright, on Jun 3 2009, 04:28 PM, said:
Remember that Blair won huge majorities with support from about 25% of the electorate but was able to claim a 'popular mandate' because of low turnouts - to professional politicians a non vote is conveniently interpreted as 'the voter is happy with the status quo'!
I think voter apathy is probably at it's highest level I can recall since being able to vote. I'm not sure which turd i'd prefer to win the local elections so your proposal sounds like the best course of action but I'll probably not waste my time and bother going.
#17
Posted 03 June 2009 - 06:49 PM
Skywalker, on Jun 3 2009, 07:30 PM, said:
lots of mixed feelings about europe but a least in those elections everyone's vote counts with proportional representation .