Sell-on clause
#2
Posted 07 January 2009 - 05:45 PM
still 300k in the bank for Ward is very good business
#4
Posted 07 January 2009 - 05:47 PM
MurrayBu, on Jan 7 2009, 05:46 PM, said:
£25% of any profit, ie, anything over what we paid them.
spireiteblue, on Jan 7 2009, 05:49 PM, said:
correct SB
#6
Posted 07 January 2009 - 05:54 PM
MurrayBu, on Jan 7 2009, 05:52 PM, said:
As azul said, when asked if we'd accept a £260k offer for Jamie, he said 'no way, because Torquay would get £65k - and therefore 25%.
See post by Phil Tooley. (the butler)
#9
Posted 07 January 2009 - 06:00 PM
MurrayBu, on Jan 7 2009, 06:00 PM, said:
Look for posts by colin heaths butler.
#11
Posted 07 January 2009 - 06:10 PM
Sammy Spireite, on Jan 7 2009, 06:12 PM, said:
If he then goes for £1m, we get £250k, surely we would have to give 25% of that to torquay??
yes., just like Folan and leeds
#12
Posted 07 January 2009 - 06:24 PM
Sammy Spireite, on Jan 7 2009, 06:12 PM, said:
If he then goes for £1m, we get £250k, surely we would have to give 25% of that to torquay??
Another confusing aspect of a sell-on clause.
Apparently we did give Leeds money, but I have read in places that that doesn't happen, also, otherwise clubs would be getting money 10 transfers down the line. Is there a cut off point?!
#15
Posted 07 January 2009 - 06:57 PM