[Wooden Spoon]

calvin plummers socks, on 05 May 2025 - 07:02 PM, said:

Yes pretty much the same (some say more cruel)

What’s the differences between the two? I thought it was very similar? Slit the throat and bleed them?

[Search & Destroy]

calvin plummers socks, on 05 May 2025 - 06:53 PM, said:

Presumably you’re against Kosher too??

Not particularly bothered but banning Kosher wouldn’t help with stemming the tide, banning Halal may put a few off

[calvin plummers socks]

Search & Destroy, on 05 May 2025 - 07:27 PM, said:

Not particularly bothered but banning Kosher wouldn’t help with stemming the tide, banning Halal may put a few off

That tells us all we need to know and how stupid you really are

[Wooden Spoon]

Search & Destroy, on 05 May 2025 - 07:27 PM, said:

Not particularly bothered but banning Kosher wouldn’t help with stemming the tide, banning Halal may put a few off

Why is one better than than the other?

[Search & Destroy]

Wooden Spoon, on 05 May 2025 - 07:54 PM, said:

Why is one better than than the other?

If Halal was banned in the UK, would there be such a tidal wave of Islam blokes crossing the channel?

[Wooden Spoon]

Search & Destroy, on 05 May 2025 - 08:45 PM, said:

If Halal was banned in the UK, would there be such a tidal wave of Islam blokes crossing the channel?

Yep, for sure. They are not coming here because we allow halal kebabs.


Don’t de so stupid.

They are coming here because they want a share of wealth we have, and our policy elite are so weak they are doing nothing to stop it so we’re seen as a soft touch.


Norway and Denmark have taken action politically under EHRC. Our government wont.


That’s the rub of it. The lack of political will to stop it for the last 20 years.


That’s why we are seeing an increase in numbers


Nothing to do with what’s in your kebabs, be that kosher or halal


If you want to be angry, don’t look at mosques, or at brown people, look at Westminster and the 650 turds sat in it, blame the political lunatics on TV, in the media, in schools, in universities, in the work place who stifle any debate or criticism


They are easy to recognise. Just look at he half dozen or so on here who do the exact same thing



It’s these people who’ve allowed, or at least influenced, to get this current state of affairs. Not the brown people.


From the previous regime, to Starmer to Thornberry to O’Brien to Azul to todhopper and many many many others.


Not the brown people, but these people.


They lack the Dunkirk spirit, but are not brown, they lack the spirit of the blitz but are not brown.

Many I served with had that spirit and were brown. They are not your enemy.


Loo at the 5th column within your own ranks. They are your enemy and you will find the vast majority are not brown people.

This post has been edited by Wooden Spoon: 05 May 2025 - 09:48 PM

[calvin plummers socks]

Search & Destroy, on 05 May 2025 - 08:45 PM, said:

If Halal was banned in the UK, would there be such a tidal wave of Islam blokes crossing the channel?

You do realise that followers of Islam are able to eat Kosher meat?

[Wooden Spoon]

calvin plummers socks, on 05 May 2025 - 09:12 PM, said:

You do realise that followers of Islam are able to eat Kosher meat?

You’ve got him there CPS.

[Search & Destroy]

calvin plummers socks, on 05 May 2025 - 09:12 PM, said:

You do realise that followers of Islam are able to eat Kosher meat?

Well ban that as well then👍🏼

[Wooden Spoon]

Search & Destroy, on 05 May 2025 - 09:37 PM, said:

Well ban that as well then👍🏼

You think that would make like 0.1% difference?

[Wooden Spoon]

.

This post has been edited by Wooden Spoon: 05 May 2025 - 10:12 PM

[Spire-ite]

It was repulsive. Copied.


Watching Starmer fawn over veterans for political clout is infuriating.

How many of those who defended Britain in WW2 would support Starmer’s:

- Housing of illegal migrants in luxury hotels whilst homeless veterans freeze on the streets.

- Attacks on free speech.

- Arrest and persecution of patriots.

- Demonising of British soldiers who served in Northern Ireland.

- Destruction of British culture.

- Open borders policy.

- Radical trans agenda.

- Promotion and protection of radical Islam.

- Removal of the Winter Fuel Allowance for the elderly.

- Bankrupting of farmers.

- Two-tier policing.

Starmer is a traitor, not a patriot.

[Mr Mercury]

Less than a quarter of Labour voters surveyed now think high levels of immigration are a positive thing for our living standards and just under half now think it’s having a negative effect on our living standards.
Seems the pennies dropping.

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 06 May 2025 - 01:15 PM

[calvin plummers socks]

 Spire-ite, on 06 May 2025 - 12:52 PM, said:

It was repulsive. Copied.


Watching Starmer fawn over veterans for political clout is infuriating.

How many of those who defended Britain in WW2 would support Starmer’s:

- Housing of illegal migrants in luxury hotels whilst homeless veterans freeze on the streets.

- Attacks on free speech.

- Arrest and persecution of patriots.

- Demonising of British soldiers who served in Northern Ireland.

- Destruction of British culture.

- Open borders policy.

- Radical trans agenda.

- Promotion and protection of radical Islam.

- Removal of the Winter Fuel Allowance for the elderly.

- Bankrupting of farmers.

- Two-tier policing.

Starmer is a traitor, not a patriot.

Nonsense

[Mr Mercury]

So even when treacherous Starmer signs what should be a superb trade deal for the UK there’s questions about his loyalty to British people and workers with his crass idiocy..so two tier Keir, is now two tier tax Keir.
He turns everything he touches into an absolute sh.te show, how long does he go on?
This is from Sky News

3 big questions on the India trade deal

1. We've been trying to do this for years - what changed /who backed down over what?

2. This is more globalisation when it's in retreat elsewhere: wise?

3. Will UK tax cut for Indian workers, so they pay less NI than Brits, cause a row?

Starmer…what a c..t, that’s me by the way, not Sky News

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 06 May 2025 - 07:55 PM

[Wooden Spoon]

 calvin plummers socks, on 06 May 2025 - 01:27 PM, said:

Nonsense

About half of it is

[Wooden Spoon]

 Mr Mercury, on 06 May 2025 - 07:52 PM, said:

So even when treacherous Starmer signs what should be a superb trade deal for the UK there’s questions about his loyalty to British people and workers with his crass idiocy..so two tier Keir, is now two tier tax Keir.
He turns everything he touches into an absolute sh.te show, how long does he go on?
This is from Sky News

3 big questions on the India trade deal

1. We've been trying to do this for years - what changed /who backed down over what?

2. This is more globalisation when it's in retreat elsewhere: wise?

3. Will UK tax cut for Indian workers, so they pay less NI than Brits, cause a row?

Starmer…what a c..t, that’s me by the way, not Sky News

Making it cheaper for employers to use Indian staff and not anyone else?


Does that apply to new visa applications or existing Indian passport holders already in the UK?



Surely that is highly discriminatory? How can you make it cheaper to employ one group of people than any others?

[isleaiw1]

Wooden Spoon, on 06 May 2025 - 08:07 PM, said:

Making it cheaper for employers to use Indian staff and not anyone else?


Does that apply to new visa applications or existing Indian passport holders already in the UK?



Surely that is highly discriminatory? How can you make it cheaper to employ one group of people than any others?

Doesnt it only relate to Indian employees over here on temp contracts who were actually paying NI in both countries because of temp nature of their contracts (which probably meant the UK companies employing them were paying extra to cover the home NI.

So not cheaper to employ them, just no longer more expensive....

[Goku]

 isleaiw1, on 06 May 2025 - 08:15 PM, said:

Doesnt it only relate to Indian employees over here on temp contracts who were actually paying NI in both countries because of temp nature of their contracts (which probably meant the UK companies employing them were paying extra to cover the home NI.

So not cheaper to employ them, just no longer more expensive....

Yes, and we have this type of deal with several other countries too. It’s a totally normal agreement. We’ve come out of this deal with everything we wanted but it’s still somehow viewed as negative… such a weird country.

[Wooden Spoon]

 isleaiw1, on 06 May 2025 - 08:15 PM, said:

Doesnt it only relate to Indian employees over here on temp contracts who were actually paying NI in both countries because of temp nature of their contracts (which probably meant the UK companies employing them were paying extra to cover the home NI.

So not cheaper to employ them, just no longer more expensive....

I don’t know, I guess I knee jerked before seeing the whole detail.