[calvin plummers socks]

You?re far too intelligent to defend those rems who vote for Reform

[isleaiw1]

calvin plummers socks, on 09 March 2025 - 08:37 PM, said:

You?re far too intelligent to defend those rems who vote for Reform

I defend anyone the right to vote for who they want to. I'll also defend that just because someone doesnt vote the same way as me that doesnt mean they are not intelligent.

(I also dont like insults like "rem" to describe someone, imagine if something similar was used to abbreviate someone's nationality)

[The Jolly Friar]

Wooden Spoon, on 09 March 2025 - 09:47 AM, said:

Trouble is people are polarised. If it?s left of centre it?s far left. It isn?t always. If it?s right of centre it?s racist nazi ideology and it isn?t always.

If it?s centrist then t lacks an ideology, when it doesn?t have to


Such is the state of politics


And CPS doesn?t know his 4R5E from a banjo, and couldn?t answer a direct question if he was asked what his favourite colour was.

He was giving it large when I raised the rumour that he was not so much a physio but a security guard, he ran away as fast as his legs could carry him. On asking him if he didn't use the words "Pakistani Muslims" because he was a Muslim, he ignored me. Two conversations he didn't want to have suggesting some defensiveness giving the impression I could be right about both those things. Of course there is nothing wrong with both those things, so why the silence?

[Valley Blues]

calvin plummers socks, on 09 March 2025 - 08:37 PM, said:

You?re far too intelligent to defend those rems who vote for Reform

You can come across as a horrible man, Mick.

Totally unnecessary and unacceptable term again from you.

[calvin plummers socks]

isleaiw1, on 09 March 2025 - 02:49 PM, said:

Two things to say about that. First, just because right wing supporters vote reform doesn't make reform right wing.... in the same way that socialist workers and communist supporters voting Labour doesn't make SKS the new Trotski....

And there ate people of lower of lower IQ vote for all parties, in some cases because it's what they are told their "type" should do. Reform are no different to the rest


Before you brand me, I would never vote reform but I do think some of what they say resonates with parts of the electorate. That's why they have support, and 20% plus of the UK electorate can't be swpt away as thick or right wing racists...

Seems even Farage seemingly says they are far right?

(Well according to this bloke)

https://x.com/lord_t...F7E94AZhJFdUGEw

[Burgerman]

calvin plummers socks, on 09 March 2025 - 08:37 PM, said:

You?re far too intelligent to defend those rems who vote for Reform

Oh dear. That?s not a very nice thing to say. It does demonstrate the type of person you are though.

Come on bruv, you?re better than that.

[Goku]

The infighting continues Lowe threatening to sue Reform for libel.

[isleaiw1]

Goku, on 10 March 2025 - 11:54 AM, said:

The infighting continues Lowe threatening to sue Reform for libel.

If we are talking infighting, have you seen how many Labour MPs are threatening to vote against SKS over his proposed welfare reforms...

But you'd rather concentrate on one idiot than 80...?

[Goku]

*event occurs relating to Reform and is commented on in a thread about Reform*

Ian: "But what about Labour?"

This post has been edited by Goku: 10 March 2025 - 12:09 PM

[The Jolly Friar]

calvin plummers socks, on 09 March 2025 - 05:12 PM, said:

Call them whatever you like love- doesn?t bother me

Why when conversing with men do you insist on calling them love? Just weird. You really are an odd fish.

[isleaiw1]

Goku, on 10 March 2025 - 12:07 PM, said:

*event occurs relating to Reform and is commented on in a thread about Reform*

Ian: "But what about Labour?"

Sorry. I'll add it to the right thread.

I assume it will be following your comment on the same as surely 80 MPs potentially voting against the govt is more important than one MP being binned off by his party who arent in govt?

You do say you arent a Labour supporter....

[Goku]

isleaiw1, on 10 March 2025 - 12:22 PM, said:

Sorry. I'll add it to the right thread.

I assume it will be following your comment on the same as surely 80 MPs potentially voting against the govt is more important than one MP being binned off by his party who arent in govt?

You do say you arent a Labour supporter....

Well I'm not a robot so my comments don't follow a formula based solely around importance of an issue. The Uyghur/Palestinian/Sudanese genocides are more important than some Labour MP's voting against what Starmer desires, your lack of commentary on those three issues has been noted

[azul]

Goku, on 10 March 2025 - 11:54 AM, said:

The infighting continues Lowe threatening to sue Reform for libel.

I only just realised Rupert Lowe had become an MP. He is the infamous Southampton FC owner in the naughties who hung around like a bad smell just for spite taking them to L2 and the brink of extinction. He isn't the sort you'd want to make an enemy of.

[Wooden Spoon]

The Jolly Friar, on 09 March 2025 - 08:44 PM, said:

He was giving it large when I raised the rumour that he was not so much a physio but a security guard, he ran away as fast as his legs could carry him. On asking him if he didn't use the words "Pakistani Muslims" because he was a Muslim, he ignored me. Two conversations he didn't want to have suggesting some defensiveness giving the impression I could be right about both those things. Of course there is nothing wrong with both those things, so why the silence?

He is involved in sports science stuff at a high level

[isleaiw1]

Goku, on 10 March 2025 - 12:29 PM, said:

Well I'm not a robot so my comments don't follow a formula based solely around importance of an issue. The Uyghur/Palestinian/Sudanese genocides are more important than some Labour MP's voting against what Starmer desires, your lack of commentary on those three issues has been noted

They are indeed but I didnt read about those over my morning coffee, and I am unlikely to be in a position to influence them, so I stick to commenting on what I have seen (be good if a few others could stick to stuff they understand too )

[Wooden Spoon]

Just watched last week’s question time.


Richard Tice from reform not performing very well on question time.


When questioned and held to his quotes he’s found out

[calvin plummers socks]

As sure as night follows day the right get all argumentative with each other.

Tommy Robinson exposed as a thief for nicking the money raised for that guy who topped himself in prison- who’d have thought it?

[Mr Mercury]

A few weeks to go yet for this by-election, expected to coincide with the May council elections, and they can be notorious to predict, so I’m not putting the Champagne on ice just yet.

The first poll for the Runcorn and Helsby by-election since Mike Amesbury threw in the towel will make happy reading for Reform. When weighting respondents by likelihood to vote, Reform are ahead with 40% to Labour’s 35%. Among those certain to vote, the gap widens – Reform leads with 45% to Labour’s 33%, according to Lord Ashcroft Polls. In the General Election Reform came second in the seat with 18% of the vote…

[Burgerman]

 calvin plummers socks, on 14 March 2025 - 04:07 PM, said:

As sure as night follows day the right get all argumentative with each other.

Tommy Robinson exposed as a thief for nicking the money raised for that guy who topped himself in prison- who’d have thought it?

Link?

[calvin plummers socks]

 Burgerman, on 14 March 2025 - 06:34 PM, said:

Link?

https://www.thesun.c...fundraiser/amp/