metallilad, on 03 March 2025 - 08:22 PM, said:
As it transpired, he was found not guilty but up until the spokesperson of the jury announced their verdict the decision the club took to try and make the Fa aware of his alleged action was absolutely the correct decision.
You're using a later fact to poorly attempt to justify an argument against the club for doing which at the time was a morally correct course of action.
Think you know no matter what evidence is put forward the likes of S&D and Town_Fan (which quite often seems an ironic user name) will continue down the same well trodden path.