Southport (Deserves Its Own Thread)
#182
Posted 21 January 2025 - 12:08 AM
It seems he was a violent dangerous man bent on killing rather than an Islamic terrorist.
#183
Posted 21 January 2025 - 08:56 AM
#184
Posted 21 January 2025 - 09:03 AM
#185
Posted 21 January 2025 - 09:59 AM
Mr Mercury said:
Hastily arranged and panicked announcement by liar Starmer this morning to try and slime his away from direct criticism.
It wasn?t long before he started to go off on a tangent and give us his opinion about the law and how he closed down the Rochdale groomers. Er?.he didn?t? Said to my wife he?s starting to ramble and I began to feel drowsy - it?s hard to concentrate when one drones on in monotone. Noticed there was no late invitation to the inauguration. What an embarrassment for our country.
#186
Posted 21 January 2025 - 10:05 AM
frearsghost, on 21 January 2025 - 09:59 AM, said:
Starmer, it wasn?t my decision to withhold information
Almost a ..the report never crossed my desk..moment
This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 21 January 2025 - 10:16 AM
#187
Posted 21 January 2025 - 10:22 AM
Exactly what we wanted to hear
#189
Posted 21 January 2025 - 11:51 AM
#190
Posted 21 January 2025 - 11:57 AM
calvin plummers socks, on 21 January 2025 - 11:51 AM, said:
Shame they didn?t arrange a swift enquiry into the grooming gangs and investigate the abuse of young adults and children
Ohh the double standards
#191
Posted 21 January 2025 - 12:11 PM
Blue roan lily, on 21 January 2025 - 11:57 AM, said:
Ohh the double standards
It?s all about self preservation for him. He?ll oppose a full public inquiry into the rape gangs for as long as he can because he?s afraid of the political implications for all parties, particularly local Labour ones in the areas it happened and because he may well himself be involved in decisions a made in the past. The hastily arranged and panicked press conference this morning was because he knew, with the further revelations from yesterday another cover up storm is growing for him. He did then preceded to hide behind statements saying to reveal some information sooner could have collapsed the trial, when commentators are already saying that this simply wouldn?t have been the case and as a lawyer he would know this. He then shamelessly threw in the caveat that it wasn?t him who made the decision to withhold information from the public from the outset.
A deeply duplicitous and evasive man. And not fit to lead this country.
This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 21 January 2025 - 12:12 PM
#192
Posted 21 January 2025 - 01:15 PM
Blue roan lily, on 21 January 2025 - 11:57 AM, said:
Ohh the double standards
You probably missed the report that was made before and the Tory Gov failed to act on any single recommendation?
Missed that??
#193
Posted 21 January 2025 - 02:09 PM
calvin plummers socks, on 21 January 2025 - 01:15 PM, said:
Missed that??
Which is one of the reasons there should be a public inquiry, to make sure things like that don't happen again, and plans can be put in place to ensure they don't.
This post has been edited by spireitetoo: 21 January 2025 - 02:12 PM
#194
Posted 21 January 2025 - 02:26 PM
How can he stand there and say he didn?t disclose details of the motivation of the Southport attacker for fear of influencing a fair trial but was more than happy to call the summer rioters right-wing thugs before an arrest was even made?
The man is a truly horrendous individual and the sooner his own motives and agenda come out, the better.
#195
Posted 21 January 2025 - 02:32 PM
Valley Blues, on 21 January 2025 - 02:26 PM, said:
How can he stand there and say he didn?t disclose details of the motivation of the Southport attacker for fear of influencing a fair trial but was more than happy to call the summer rioters right-wing thugs before an arrest was even made?
The man is a truly horrendous individual and the sooner his own motives and agenda come out, the better.
Loool
#196
Posted 21 January 2025 - 02:33 PM
Valley Blues, on 21 January 2025 - 02:26 PM, said:
How can he stand there and say he didn?t disclose details of the motivation of the Southport attacker for fear of influencing a fair trial but was more than happy to call the summer rioters right-wing thugs before an arrest was even made?
The man is a truly horrendous individual and the sooner his own motives and agenda come out, the better.
Didn?t the CPS or the government, not sure which, have to remove some online material showing people potentially involved in the riots and classifying them as guilty before they had fair trial?
Also I?ve read online that the murderer of Dennis Ames had pre trial info revealed, similar to that withheld by Starmers government in the Southport case because it might collapse the trial.
But the thing that keeps coming back to me in all this is how during this mornings appearance Starmer said that the withholding of information wasn?t his decision. To openly state that is truly pathetic. He just has to wring his hands of anything that he can. He just isn?t fit for the role of PM of this country.
#200
Posted 21 January 2025 - 02:51 PM
Burgerman, on 21 January 2025 - 02:41 PM, said:
It seems to me that all these supposed do gooders are the ones that are volatile and are so one sided that they wont accept anyone elses opinion or argument
You cannot debate with these people or have a rational conversation
You look at the professional protesters every Saturday in Khans cesspit, they are so deluded and biased an adult conversation is impossible with these people