Frost Covers
#81
Posted 05 January 2025 - 06:18 AM
#82
Posted 05 January 2025 - 06:20 AM
#83
Posted 05 January 2025 - 06:42 AM
Westbars Spireite, on 05 January 2025 - 06:20 AM, said:
No chance of it being on
#84
Posted 05 January 2025 - 06:55 AM
#85
Posted 05 January 2025 - 07:01 AM
This post has been edited by danblue: 05 January 2025 - 07:01 AM
#86
Posted 05 January 2025 - 07:07 AM
#87
Posted 05 January 2025 - 07:41 AM
I agree the ref is likely to make a decision on what he sees at the time as the whole point of this is to inform people whether to travel or not.
I can see people moaning by mid day about the postponement.
#88
Posted 05 January 2025 - 07:42 AM
azul, on 05 January 2025 - 07:41 AM, said:
I agree the ref is likely to make a decision on what he sees at the time as the whole point of this is to inform people whether to travel or not.
I can see people moaning by mid day about the postponement.
Agree on the final point. It could we?ll all be gone by lunch time if the weather is as predicted
#89
Posted 05 January 2025 - 07:47 AM
Yorkshire is Yorkshire
Never the twain shall meet.
Again
#90
Posted 05 January 2025 - 07:51 AM
CFC91, on 05 January 2025 - 07:42 AM, said:
These live radar weather maps are really reliable and it shows the precipitation type as rain. Probably not even worth trying to clear it as the snow will be thinning out before they get anything organised.
clarevoyant., on 05 January 2025 - 07:47 AM, said:
Violent Conduct. He admitted the offence whatever it was.
This post has been edited by azul: 05 January 2025 - 07:53 AM
#91
Posted 05 January 2025 - 07:55 AM
All will be well
#92
Posted 05 January 2025 - 07:55 AM
azul, on 05 January 2025 - 07:41 AM, said:
I agree the ref is likely to make a decision on what he sees at the time as the whole point of this is to inform people whether to travel or not.
I can see people moaning by mid day about the postponement.
7.45 was ridiculously early, if done at 10/11.45 there could be a totally different outlook, what with 3/4 hours work and weather change. I don't think the travel arrangements of a few folk living 200ish miles away should be a consideration, we'll it isn't when they swap games for tv.
Yorkshire is Yorkshire
Never the twain shall meet.
Again
#93
Posted 05 January 2025 - 07:59 AM
clarevoyant., on 05 January 2025 - 07:55 AM, said:
Not when you consider where the opposition are coming from...Gillingham isn't 5 minutes away.
#94
Posted 05 January 2025 - 08:02 AM
clarevoyant., on 05 January 2025 - 07:55 AM, said:
I don't recall you taking that stance when we are the away side.
#95
Posted 05 January 2025 - 08:03 AM
clarevoyant., on 05 January 2025 - 07:55 AM, said:
Like you say it isn?t for tv games but it should be and it?s good that here they seem to be thinking about the supporters. It could easily have been the other way round and a few folk travelling 200 miles south. Time there WAS more consideration of the supporters , especially by tv
#96
Posted 05 January 2025 - 08:05 AM
clarevoyant., on 05 January 2025 - 07:55 AM, said:
Aye mate, sat in my living room in Wimbledon almost frothing at the mouth to get in the car and turn around by Bedford 🤣 of course travel arrangements for travelling fans should be considered; you?d be fuming if you?d set off to a game and it was called off mid journey
#97
Posted 05 January 2025 - 08:05 AM
azul, on 05 January 2025 - 07:51 AM, said:
Violent Conduct. He admitted the offence whatever it was.
No one (alot) I've spoken too (at the game or on tv) actually saw it or saw anyone die, which is a miracle in this day and age considering we do boxing training.
Banks would be towing the line as were Weston and Grimes for their alleged offences against the soilyhull thespian X1. What I want to know is would the incriminating footage have been so readily available if it had been a Fleetwood player.
A cheats charter!!
Yorkshire is Yorkshire
Never the twain shall meet.
Again
#98
Posted 05 January 2025 - 08:07 AM
#99
Posted 05 January 2025 - 08:08 AM
clarevoyant., on 05 January 2025 - 08:05 AM, said:
Banks would be towing the line as were Weston and Grimes for their alleged offences against the soilyhull thespian X1. What I want to know is would the incriminating footage have been so readily available if it had been a Fleetwood player.
A cheats charter!!
He punched one of theirs in the stomach. Stupid thing to do!! I one else to blame but Banks
#100
Posted 05 January 2025 - 08:10 AM
ESI, on 05 January 2025 - 08:05 AM, said:
Absolutely agree, my point being they aren't if sky say they aren't.
However I feel on this occasion if the inspection was done later it would have a far better chance of being on
Yorkshire is Yorkshire
Never the twain shall meet.
Again