And Still It Goes On!
#3601
Posted 01 January 2025 - 09:50 PM
#3602
Posted 01 January 2025 - 10:30 PM
Mr Mercury, on 01 January 2025 - 08:01 PM, said:
That?s what I find truly offensive - authorise covering up or making light of monstrous crimes like this
They would rather throw thousands of young girls into the fire, rather than call out the barbaric actions of men from the Pakistani community
#3603
Posted 01 January 2025 - 10:43 PM
Wooden Spoon, on 01 January 2025 - 10:30 PM, said:
They would rather throw thousands of young girls into the fire, rather than call out the barbaric actions of men from the Pakistani community
You have to wonder why Jess Phillips and Labour would take that route, wouldn?t you?
#3604
Posted 01 January 2025 - 11:07 PM
Mr Mercury, on 01 January 2025 - 10:43 PM, said:
I?m not blaming labour for this, it?s wider than one party.
Councils, police, schools, social services, crown prosecutors and Westminster are all equally to blame, and we had a Tory government for the previous 14 years - so no it?s not a labour issue it?s an establishment problem
This post has been edited by Wooden Spoon: 01 January 2025 - 11:16 PM
#3605
Posted 01 January 2025 - 11:30 PM
#3606
Posted 01 January 2025 - 11:47 PM
Mr Mercury, on 01 January 2025 - 11:30 PM, said:
None of them would - as we saw in Rochdale the establishment had to be shamed into action . One female senior police officer resigned in protest and took up the cause as a privateer
The establishment don?t realise this is manna from heaven for reform and the voting public are sick of the cover ups
#3607
Posted 02 January 2025 - 02:12 PM
Mr Mercury, on 01 January 2025 - 08:01 PM, said:
Obviously, she doesn't want to upset her client base and become a target (like she was during her election campaign - apparently, that was just 'men').
Her hypocrisy and duplicity is what boils my urine. A tweet from her just before Labour got into power, stated:
'Next time a government minister tells you that violence against women and children is a priority for them. Don't believe them. It isn't they literally don't give a toss'
Then, she blocks a public enquiry.... absolutely disgusting conduct - she's the one who doesn't give a 'toss'.
This post has been edited by Misnomer: 02 January 2025 - 02:13 PM
#3608
Posted 02 January 2025 - 02:28 PM
Misnomer, on 02 January 2025 - 02:12 PM, said:
Her hypocrisy and duplicity is what boils my urine. A tweet from her just before Labour got into power, stated:
'Next time a government minister tells you that violence against women and children is a priority for them. Don't believe them. It isn't they literally don't give a toss'
Then, she blocks a public enquiry.... absolutely disgusting conduct - she's the one who doesn't give a 'toss'.
If a full public enquiry was held it could also go back to a period and involve looking more deeply into the CPS and their involvement and role, a time period when a certain, now high ranking, politician may have had some involvement with that department as well, possibly?
This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 02 January 2025 - 02:28 PM
#3609
Posted 02 January 2025 - 02:33 PM
Mr Mercury, on 02 January 2025 - 02:28 PM, said:
Quite....
#3610
Posted 02 January 2025 - 09:07 PM
Just wow. Just how senior were/are they. Are they still senior politicians. Blow the lid off them Simon
#3611
Posted 03 January 2025 - 07:49 AM
Mr Mercury, on 02 January 2025 - 09:07 PM, said:
Just wow. Just how senior were/are they. Are they still senior politicians. Blow the lid off them Simon
How low can you get. Votes, over ruining the lives of 12/13 year old girls; quite unbelievable.
Labour block an inquiry into Sir Keir Starmer?s conduct as the head of the Crown Prosecution Service.... interesting.
#3612
Posted 03 January 2025 - 12:42 PM
Misnomer, on 02 January 2025 - 02:12 PM, said:
Her hypocrisy and duplicity is what boils my urine. A tweet from her just before Labour got into power, stated:
'Next time a government minister tells you that violence against women and children is a priority for them. Don't believe them. It isn't they literally don't give a toss'
Then, she blocks a public enquiry.... absolutely disgusting conduct - she's the one who doesn't give a 'toss'.
Well said.
This post has been edited by The Jolly Friar: 03 January 2025 - 12:43 PM
#3613
Posted 03 January 2025 - 01:11 PM
Iyad Albattikhi and Mohammed Reveshi stood trial in 2008, but the Crown Prosecution Service decided there could be no case due to errors in evidence gathering by police
Prosecution said the men planned turning her into kebab meat to get rid of evidence
She has never been found
They walked free
#3614
Posted 03 January 2025 - 01:27 PM
Mr Mercury, on 02 January 2025 - 09:07 PM, said:
Just wow. Just how senior were/are they. Are they still senior politicians. Blow the lid off them Simon
Yes, saw it. Simon Danczuk, former Rochdale MP on TV this morning revealing he was told by some Labour MPs not to mention ethnicity and religion because it will effect the Labour vote. Also revealed, is a tweet by Labour MP Naz Shah who wrote 'those abused girls in Rotherham should shut their mouths for the good of diversity'. This is an habitual mentality that runs through the Labour Party. Starmer imprisons people for shouting hurty words that normally would result in a fine or be bound over to keep the peace, yet ignores Muslims shouting Jihadi ideology on 'peaceful' Palestine protests. Phillips now refuses a national enquiry based, ironically, on the same principle of community relations that was responsible for the groomers running amok in the first place. It is sheer cowardness. No surprise then, we learn 90% of Muslims vote Labour.
#3615
Posted 03 January 2025 - 01:31 PM
Misnomer, on 02 January 2025 - 02:12 PM, said:
Her hypocrisy and duplicity is what boils my urine. A tweet from her just before Labour got into power, stated:
'Next time a government minister tells you that violence against women and children is a priority for them. Don't believe them. It isn't they literally don't give a toss'
Then, she blocks a public enquiry.... absolutely disgusting conduct - she's the one who doesn't give a 'toss'.
On here, we have a couple of posters who refer to Pakistani Muslim groomers simply as 'men', the ones constantly shouting racist and islamophobia. They are simply pussies to the Labour party ideological line and have long been discredited. Earlier, there was talk of a date from which Starmer could be judged. It was a waste of time. Labour have lost the next election and that was decided after just six weeks.
This post has been edited by frearsghost: 03 January 2025 - 01:33 PM
#3616
Posted 03 January 2025 - 04:39 PM
frearsghost, on 03 January 2025 - 01:31 PM, said:
What, leftist hypocrisy? Diversity is an unending moral good that can do no wrong? Grooming gang abuse survivors, obviously suffering from false consciousness? Young white girls being racially abused as white slags, white whores, and 'gories' (for the uninitiated, that's a Pakistani derogatory term for a white person)? Home Office dismissing Pakistani grooming gangs as 'grievance narrative' invented by right-wing extremists? Can't be true....
#3617
Posted 03 January 2025 - 05:14 PM
My word.
This post has been edited by Wooden Spoon: 03 January 2025 - 05:15 PM
#3618
Posted 03 January 2025 - 05:55 PM
Misnomer, on 03 January 2025 - 04:39 PM, said:
The girl interviewed who?s nightmare of abuse started when she was 5 yrs old being asked by police if she consented.
#3619
Posted 03 January 2025 - 06:00 PM
Wooden Spoon, on 03 January 2025 - 05:14 PM, said:
My word.
For clarity, Naz Shah didn't write these words.
However she did re-tweet and 'like' them when appearing on a 'parody' account claiming to belong to Owen Jones.
All of which she then deleted.
I suggest folk once again get their facts straight before posting.
Because another fact is she later sued Leave.EU, the group in part formed by current Reform chairman Tice, after they accused her of being a "grooming gang apologist".
Shah won the case, resuting in damages being paid, an apology, and Leave.EU stating her a "vociferous campaigner for victims of grooming gangs"...
This post has been edited by The Earl of Chesterfield: 03 January 2025 - 06:04 PM
#3620
Posted 03 January 2025 - 06:02 PM
The Earl of Chesterfield, on 03 January 2025 - 06:00 PM, said:
However she did re-tweet and 'like' them when appearing on a 'parody' account claiming to belong to Owen Jones.
All of which she then deleted.
Those are the facts so folk can decide for themselves.
Another fact is she later sued Leave.EU, the group in part formed by current Reform chairman Tice, after they accused her of being a "grooming gang apologist".
Shah won the case, resuting in damages being paid, an apology, and Leave.EU stating her a "voiferous campaigner for victims of grooming gangs"...
I was called the same by 2 people on here