[Search & Destroy]

Simply terrifying and tragic news

https://slguardian.o...d-polygamy/amp/

https://www.wionews....cils-785209/amp

The Islamification of the UK continues at breakneck speed

This post has been edited by Search & Destroy: 19 December 2024 - 05:11 PM

[Painted Wagon]

Say divorce 3 times and it is done deal. Sell your house with a handshake. All do our own wills using the post office one. We could do away with solicitors. Every cloud

[Mr Mercury]

Search & Destroy, on 19 December 2024 - 05:09 PM, said:

Simply terrifying and tragic news

https://slguardian.o...d-polygamy/amp/

https://www.wionews....cils-785209/amp

The Islamification of the UK continues at breakneck speed

Times newspaper expose. Richard Trice asked a question about it in the house this afternoon and received a flippant response i thought.

[Search & Destroy]

Here?s a few tasty bits in Sharia law on the treatment of women.

1.Inheritance: Women inherit half the amount men receive.

2.Marriage: Women often require the consent of a male guardian to marry, while men do not.

3.Divorce: Men can initiate a divorce (talaq) by verbal declaration, but women face significant legal and social barriers to obtain one.

4.Child Custody: After a certain age (often 7 for boys, 9 for girls), custody typically defaults to the father, regardless of the mother?s circumstances.

5.Testimony in Court: A woman?s testimony is often considered worth half that of a man?s, requiring two female witnesses to equal one male.

6.Domestic Violence: Some interpretations of Sharia permit ?disciplinary? physical punishment of wives by their husbands.

7.Polygamy: Men are allowed up to four wives, but women cannot have more than one husband.

8.Rape Victims: In some cases, a woman must produce four male witnesses to prove a rape, or she risks being charged with adultery.

9.Dress Code: Strict dress codes are imposed on women, often under penalty of law, with little or no equivalent restrictions for men.

10.Freedom of Movement: In some interpretations, women cannot travel without a male guardian or their husband?s permission.

11.Work and Education: Women may face restrictions on working or attending school, depending on the interpretation and enforcement of Sharia.

This medieval law does NOT belong in Britain.






*stolen

[Misnomer]

Search & Destroy, on 19 December 2024 - 10:00 PM, said:

Here?s a few tasty bits in Sharia law on the treatment of women.

1.Inheritance: Women inherit half the amount men receive.

2.Marriage: Women often require the consent of a male guardian to marry, while men do not.

3.Divorce: Men can initiate a divorce (talaq) by verbal declaration, but women face significant legal and social barriers to obtain one.

4.Child Custody: After a certain age (often 7 for boys, 9 for girls), custody typically defaults to the father, regardless of the mother?s circumstances.

5.Testimony in Court: A woman?s testimony is often considered worth half that of a man?s, requiring two female witnesses to equal one male.

6.Domestic Violence: Some interpretations of Sharia permit ?disciplinary? physical punishment of wives by their husbands.

7.Polygamy: Men are allowed up to four wives, but women cannot have more than one husband.

8.Rape Victims: In some cases, a woman must produce four male witnesses to prove a rape, or she risks being charged with adultery.

9.Dress Code: Strict dress codes are imposed on women, often under penalty of law, with little or no equivalent restrictions for men.

10.Freedom of Movement: In some interpretations, women cannot travel without a male guardian or their husband?s permission.

11.Work and Education: Women may face restrictions on working or attending school, depending on the interpretation and enforcement of Sharia.

This medieval law does NOT belong in Britain.






*stolen

You'd think, give what they've previously written on here, certain folk would be vehemently against such practices....not a peep.

[Goku]

Misnomer, on 20 December 2024 - 10:48 AM, said:

You'd think, give what they've previously written on here, certain folk would be vehemently against such practices....not a peep.

Some things are so obviously wrong and messed up they don't need commenting on. Might as well be pointing at Hitler and saying he's a bad person; it's fairly obvious! Sharia Law is horrific.

[Painted Wagon]

Just seen that the 2 brothers have been charged over the airport incident

[Goku]

Painted Wagon, on 20 December 2024 - 01:25 PM, said:

Just seen that the 2 brothers have been charged over the airport incident

Nah. It's two tier remember, there's no way they've been charged. You have made a mistake.

[Mr Mercury]

Goku, on 20 December 2024 - 01:50 PM, said:

Nah. It's two tier remember, there's no way they've been charged. You have made a mistake.

Took long enough, I wonder what the sentence might be if it they?re found guilty.

[Johnnyspireite7]

Mr Mercury, on 20 December 2024 - 01:53 PM, said:

Took long enough, I wonder what the sentence might be if it they?re found guilty.

What's the going rate for assaulting Police Officers if found guilty, 2 years?

This post has been edited by Johnnyspireite7: 20 December 2024 - 01:55 PM

[Goku]

Mr Mercury, on 20 December 2024 - 01:53 PM, said:

Took long enough, I wonder what the sentence might be if it they?re found guilty.

Yes sometimes investigations take time. I'm not sure but whatever it is, I'm sure it'll be deemed too low and no rightie screeching about two tier will accept that they were wrong in this instance

I?m really surprised that the officer who stamped on the bloke?s head isn?t getting any punishment but I?m fine with the CPS? verdict, they?ll know much more than I on the matter. Actually, what I mean is, this is an example of two tier justice - the CPS letting a police offer get away with stamping on somebody?s head, it just goes to show how biased they are towards law enforcement - two tier justice at its finest. Disgrace etc etc

This post has been edited by Goku: 20 December 2024 - 03:03 PM

[Search & Destroy]

Good old Farrars

This post has been edited by Search & Destroy: 20 December 2024 - 02:41 PM

[s42blue]

Misnomer, on 20 December 2024 - 10:48 AM, said:

You'd think, give what they've previously written on here, certain folk would be vehemently against such practices....not a peep.

I think Sharia should have no place in the UK.

[Benno Spire]

Painted Wagon, on 20 December 2024 - 01:25 PM, said:

Just seen that the 2 brothers have been charged over the airport incident

Wouldn?t be surprised to see a Muslim judge appointed to oversee the case to get them off on a technicality

[Mr Mercury]

Benno Spire, on 20 December 2024 - 10:07 PM, said:

Wouldn?t be surprised to see a Muslim judge appointed to oversee the case to get them off on a technicality

Apparently the judge, in fact I think he was a senior magistrate, Judge Tan Ikram, who didn?t give the woman who threw a milk shake over Nigel Farage, a custodial term, was reprimanded recently for liking pro Palestinian tweets, and the defendant in the milk shake case wore a Palestine badge on her top during her trial. Sure I?ve read that somewhere.

[Mr Mercury]

Goku, on 20 December 2024 - 01:58 PM, said:

Yes sometimes investigations take time. I'm not sure but whatever it is, I'm sure it'll be deemed too low and no rightie screeching about two tier will accept that they were wrong in this instance

I?m really surprised that the officer who stamped on the bloke?s head isn?t getting any punishment but I?m fine with the CPS? verdict, they?ll know much more than I on the matter. Actually, what I mean is, this is an example of two tier justice - the CPS letting a police offer get away with stamping on somebody?s head, it just goes to show how biased they are towards law enforcement - two tier justice at its finest. Disgrace etc etc

Why would the police officer be punished ? He was using necessary force to restrain a violent thug, I though the release of the first clip proved that, and so the CPS agreed

[Goku]

Mr Mercury, on 20 December 2024 - 11:01 PM, said:

Why would the police officer be punished ? He was using necessary force to restrain a violent thug, I though the release of the first clip proved that, and so the CPS agreed

I thought they?d say it was excessive force, but they haven?t and I?m fine with that. I can accept decisions which go against my opinion without claiming there are two tiers and suchlike

[Mr Mercury]

Goku, on 20 December 2024 - 11:07 PM, said:

I thought they?d say it was excessive force, but they haven?t and I?m fine with that. I can accept decisions which go against my opinion without claiming there are two tiers and suchlike

From what I saw re the first clip I thought it was reasonable force.

[Search & Destroy]

Misnomer, on 10 November 2024 - 11:18 AM, said:

The heightened police presence in Manchester, not only loads of them, but a significant amount are armed. So, that's armed police for a Christmas market....let that sink in.

All too predictable , a naughty car as per the BBC headline

?Car hits people at Christmas market?

https://edition.cnn....0-24/index.html

This post has been edited by Search & Destroy: 20 December 2024 - 11:12 PM

[Search & Destroy]

Marine Le Pen

Once again, Islamist barbarity is sowing terror in the heart of Europe. This act of war against a symbol of our civilisation is heartbreaking.

Our thoughts this evening are with the victims and families of this carnage perpetrated in the middle of the Christmas market in Magdeburg, Germany.