[Search & Destroy]

https://www.bbc.co.u...es/c3e8d344vndo

[Misnomer]

Yeah, he's about as much of a female footballer as Khelif is a female boxer....embarrassing, and the BBC are an absolute joke.

[Mr Mercury]

Likewise the FA for banning the 17 yr old girl with autism for 6 games for asking if an opponent with a beard she was playing against was a man.

[calvin plummers socks]

^^^
If you had money on which 3 people would be the first to denegrate a female black player you?d have had very short odds on these

[sophocles]

calvin plummers socks, on 27 November 2024 - 12:37 AM, said:

^^^
If you had money on which 3 people would be the first to denegrate a female black player you?d have had very short odds on these

Yes, but you have to be amazed at their astonishing ability to definitively determine a player's gender just by looking at a video! All three of them obviously hold academically outstanding biology qualifications - PHDs at the very least.

[Goku]

calvin plummers socks, on 27 November 2024 - 12:37 AM, said:

^^^
If you had money on which 3 people would be the first to denegrate a female black player you?d have had very short odds on these

😂😂 moths to a flame

[Search & Destroy]

Goku, on 27 November 2024 - 07:51 AM, said:

😂😂 moths to a flame

🤛 standing up for the fairer sex

[Goku]

Search & Destroy, on 27 November 2024 - 08:07 AM, said:

🤛 standing up for the fairer sex

Virtue signalling

[Search & Destroy]

calvin plummers socks, on 27 November 2024 - 12:37 AM, said:

^^^
If you had money on which 3 people would be the first to denegrate a male black player winning a woman?s award you?d have had very short odds on these

[s42blue]

Search & Destroy, on 27 November 2024 - 08:07 AM, said:

🤛 standing up for the fairer sex

Whereabouts on your post are you standing up for them?

To me I can only see a link, am I missing something?

[Search & Destroy]

s42blue, on 27 November 2024 - 08:51 AM, said:

Whereabouts on your post are you standing up for them?

To me I can only see a link, am I missing something?

Yes you are missing something,, did you read the link?

The winner has failed gender tests, so basically you have women competing against non biological women

I don?t think that?s in the spirit, do you?

This post has been edited by Search & Destroy: 27 November 2024 - 08:59 AM

[s42blue]

Search & Destroy, on 27 November 2024 - 08:58 AM, said:

Yes you are missing something,, did you read the link?

The winner has failed gender tests, so basically you have women competing against non biological women

I don?t think that?s in the spirit, do you?

I did. How can I be missing something? You included a link yet offered no context or your own thoughts There was nothing to miss; you offered no debate.

It also says there might not have been tests. It also says Banda has increased levels of testosterone not that she is a non biological woman. Is she a non biological female? I don?t know without researching more.

Spirit? FIFA is reviewing rules and spirit should play no part.

[calvin plummers socks]

Search & Destroy, on 27 November 2024 - 08:07 AM, said:

🤛 standing up for the fairer sex

Yiu didn?t stand up to them quite as much when you were supporting Ched Evans and James Rowe - 🤷🏽‍♂️

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Search & Destroy, on 27 November 2024 - 08:07 AM, said:

🤛 standing up for the fairer sex

Your record on promoting women, be it in terms of insulting female commentators or your infamous attitude towards the Rowe case, suggests this is simply untrue.

Indeed everyone can be forgiving for thinking this is just another attempt to promote bigotry.

I'd urge the Mod's to move this topic to the 'Personal' section where it can descend into all too predictable gibberish...

[Westbars Spireite]

calvin plummers socks, on 27 November 2024 - 09:14 AM, said:

Yiu didn?t stand up to them quite as much when you were supporting Ched Evans and James Rowe - 🤷🏽‍♂️

That's a fair point.

[s42blue]

calvin plummers socks, on 27 November 2024 - 09:14 AM, said:

Yiu didn?t stand up to them quite as much when you were supporting Ched Evans and James Rowe - 🤷🏽‍♂️

Very good point.

He?ll say legally they were found not guilty. Then of course legally Banda is female so thread closed (or moved at best).

[Search & Destroy]

calvin plummers socks, on 27 November 2024 - 09:14 AM, said:

Yiu didn?t stand up to them quite as much when you were supporting Ched Evans and James Rowe - 🤷🏽‍♂️

What the innocent two?

I support men?s rights on those occasions

[Search & Destroy]

s42blue, on 27 November 2024 - 09:10 AM, said:

I did. How can I be missing something? You included a link yet offered no context or your own thoughts There was nothing to miss; you offered no debate.

It also says there might not have been tests. It also says Banda has increased levels of testosterone not that she is a non biological woman. Is she a non biological female? I don?t know without researching more.

Spirit? FIFA is reviewing rules and spirit should play no part.

Well research it more then?

A bit pointless to have an opinion otherwise

Here is the previous BBC link from 2022

s42blue, on 27 November 2024 - 09:34 AM, said:

Very good point.

He?ll say legally they were found not guilty. Then of course legally Banda is female so thread closed (or moved at best).

Are you suggesting CE and JR were guilty?

Be careful

[s42blue]

Search & Destroy, on 27 November 2024 - 09:46 AM, said:

Well research it more then?

A bit pointless to have an opinion otherwise

Here is the previous BBC link from 2022




Are you suggesting CE and JR were guilty?

Be careful

My post was relating to your habit of posting a link with no context, explanation or debate so I didn?t need to research that particular subject.

How very kind of you to worry but as you know I said they were found innocent. Fact. So no context required.

So legally Banda is a woman, so what point are you making? In the spirit of the game how would you view Evans and his treatment of the woman involved?

This post has been edited by s42blue: 27 November 2024 - 10:23 AM

[Snowflake McBedwetter]

Goku, on 27 November 2024 - 07:51 AM, said:

😂😂 moths to a flame

Bit rich that!

The same four or five of you who've since waded in were all over the Evans, Mendy, Rowe and Greenwood threads like a rash. And absoloutely wrong on all counts. Doubtless, you're all probably in the corner of biological men beating the snot out of women in the boxing ring or destroying their records on track, field or swimming pool.

Heads up. By constantly defending the actions of feckless, lying and opportunistic women/'women' you're not supporting women in general. You're undermining them.