[calvin plummers socks]

Misnomer, on 18 November 2024 - 10:44 AM, said:

Thick dunce 👍🏿

🤷🏽‍♂️

[s42blue]

calvin plummers socks, on 18 November 2024 - 11:50 AM, said:

🤷🏽‍♂️

Can?t one of you 2 be the bigger person and not reply, clogging up yet another thread? I hold little hope.

[azul]

s42blue, on 18 November 2024 - 01:35 PM, said:

Can?t one of you 2 be the bigger person and not reply, clogging up yet another thread? I hold little hope.

I quite like the idea of them clogging up this thread

[s42blue]

azul, on 18 November 2024 - 01:55 PM, said:

I quite like the idea of them clogging up this thread

Good point, well made.

[Town_Fan]

Misnomer, on 17 November 2024 - 11:51 AM, said:

Meanwhile, during the riots, another major incident; we had huge gangs of Muslim lads, brazenly walking around with hammers, knives and machetes, directly in front of the police, and they did.... nothing.

To be fair, the police did ask them nicely to store the weapons in the nearest mosque.

[Arnold Tabbs]

Misnomer, on 17 November 2024 - 11:51 AM, said:

Your opinion seems to be, people who disagree with you shouldn't have an opinion. And if they do, you class it as, cherry picking, creating false narratives and conspiracy theories. Have you learned nothing from the Southport tragedy....

Not once have I said or implied that people I disagree with aren't entitled to an opinion. You could just as easily say the same thing about yourself, considering your ongoing slanging match with CPS.

What were we supposed to learn from the Southport tragedy that we didn't know before?

Islamic militants are dangerous.

Who's arguing?

They carry out terrorist attacks.

Aye, we know.

That doesn't mean that all Muslims, or all immigrants or all Asian people should be victimised - and I'm not accusing you of doing so although Search & Destroy certainly seems to have a racist bee in his bonnet. What I am saying is that you ignore stories that don't support your narrative and highlight ones that show Muslims in a bad light. Frear's Ghost said he didn't comment on the Morrisons racist story because he hadn't heard about it, which isn't surprising if the only news outlets he uses are the ones that mirror his opinions. I didn't have to go searching for it, it was on the BBC News website.

What he demonstrated there was confirmation bias. There's an awful lot of it going on here in what is - my opinion again and if you don't like it, please yourself - disgusting and nasty thread.

This post has been edited by Arnold Tabbs: 19 November 2024 - 12:50 PM

[frearsghost]

Arnold Tabbs, on 19 November 2024 - 12:49 PM, said:

Not once have I said or implied that people I disagree with aren't entitled to an opinion. You could just as easily say the same thing about yourself, considering your ongoing slanging match with CPS.

What were we supposed to learn from the Southport tragedy that we didn't know before?

Islamic militants are dangerous.

Who's arguing?

They carry out terrorist attacks.

Aye, we know.

That doesn't mean that all Muslims, or all immigrants or all Asian people should be victimised - and I'm not accusing you of doing so although Search & Destroy certainly seems to have a racist bee in his bonnet. What I am saying is that you ignore stories that don't support your narrative and highlight ones that show Muslims in a bad light. Frear's Ghost said he didn't comment on the Morrisons racist story because he hadn't heard about it, which isn't surprising if the only news outlets he uses are the ones that mirror his opinions. I didn't have to go searching for it, it was on the BBC News website.

What he demonstrated there was confirmation bias. There's an awful lot of it going on here in what is - my opinion again and if you don't like it, please yourself - disgusting and nasty thread.

Hang on a minute there fella. You have no idea what media outlets I read, so any comments about 'confirmation bias' fails muster. I have my own beliefs about what is right and wrong and don't need some media organisation to tell me thank you very much. Anyway, how can someone go searching for something if they have no knowlege it exists?

This post has been edited by frearsghost: 19 November 2024 - 03:01 PM

[s42blue]

Tbf you assumed you knew what I was thinking 😂 (You didn?t) Let?s not go there though 😂😂

Very philosophical last line/question. 👍

[Misnomer]

Arnold Tabbs, on 19 November 2024 - 12:49 PM, said:

Not once have I said or implied that people I disagree with aren't entitled to an opinion. You could just as easily say the same thing about yourself, considering your ongoing slanging match with CPS.

What were we supposed to learn from the Southport tragedy that we didn't know before?

Islamic militants are dangerous.

Who's arguing?

They carry out terrorist attacks.

Aye, we know.

That doesn't mean that all Muslims, or all immigrants or all Asian people should be victimised - and I'm not accusing you of doing so although Search & Destroy certainly seems to have a racist bee in his bonnet. What I am saying is that you ignore stories that don't support your narrative and highlight ones that show Muslims in a bad light. Frear's Ghost said he didn't comment on the Morrisons racist story because he hadn't heard about it, which isn't surprising if the only news outlets he uses are the ones that mirror his opinions. I didn't have to go searching for it, it was on the BBC News website.

What he demonstrated there was confirmation bias. There's an awful lot of it going on here in what is - my opinion again and if you don't like it, please yourself - disgusting and nasty thread.

Mate, by definition, the labelling of opposing opinions as conspiracy theories and false narratives, is shutting down the conversation. You are purposely debasing the argument that opposes your view; in essence, attempting to discredit it and claim the moral high ground (you've literally just done by claiming fears has demonstrated confirmation bias).

The events in Southport let to nationwide riots. People highly frustrated, not listened to, sick to death of being told what to think and what they can't say. The locals knew the perpetrator was a Muslim terrorist; the government and police tried to change the narrative, purposely trying to shift the focus away from a maniacal Muslim terrorist, to a Christian choir boy. You are doing exactly the same.

There are people on here who still refuse to accept and acknowledge that the perpetrator is a Muslim terrorist; slinging cheap, 'racist' and 'islamophobic' accusations, because it doesn't with their twisted ideology.

[calvin plummers socks]

Misnomer, on 19 November 2024 - 07:04 PM, said:

Mate, by definition, the labelling of opposing opinions as conspiracy theories and false narratives, is shutting down the conversation. You are purposely debasing the argument that opposes your view; in essence, attempting to discredit it and claim the moral high ground (you've literally just done by claiming fears has demonstrated confirmation bias).

The events in Southport let to nationwide riots. People highly frustrated, not listened to, sick to death of being told what to think and what they can't say. The locals knew the perpetrator was a Muslim terrorist; the government and police tried to change the narrative, purposely trying to shift the focus away from a maniacal Muslim terrorist, to a Christian choir boy. You are doing exactly the same.

There are people on here who still refuse to accept and acknowledge that the perpetrator is a Muslim terrorist; slinging cheap, 'racist' and 'islamophobic' accusations, because it doesn't with their twisted ideology.

Standard daily racist ignorant needless rant against Islam ✔️

[Search & Destroy]

https://uknip.co.uk/...arina-cheshire/

[calvin plummers socks]

Search & Destroy, on 23 November 2024 - 01:38 PM, said:

https://uknip.co.uk/...arina-cheshire/

Wait until they hear about people eating chickens!!

[Blue roan lily]

calvin plummers socks, on 23 November 2024 - 02:16 PM, said:

Wait until they hear about people eating chickens!!

Very much different
Chickens are generally ( rightly or wrongly ) manufactured for people to eat ( very good source of protein as you know being a physiotherapist )
Swans are not its as simple as that
Swans are also protected under the wildlife conservation laws.
Perhaps your flippant comment regarding chickens is very much underwhelming

This post has been edited by Blue roan lily: 23 November 2024 - 06:25 PM

[calvin plummers socks]

Blue roan lily, on 23 November 2024 - 06:20 PM, said:

Very much different
Chickens are generally ( rightly or wrongly ) manufactured for people to eat ( very good source of protein as you know being a physiotherapist )
Swans are not its as simple as that
Swans are also protected under the wildlife conservation laws.
Perhaps your flippant comment regarding chickens is very much underwhelming

Just birds though innit
Not as though swans contribute much to society?..

[Blue roan lily]

calvin plummers socks, on 23 November 2024 - 06:50 PM, said:

Just birds though innit
Not as though swans contribute much to society?..

Very much a response I expect from you
Swans are a protected species but obviously that means nothing to the savages that will kill and eat anything
Anyone that kills a swan can expect a very harsh sentence, however as we all know these savages will play the ignorance card.

[Mr Mercury]

Blue roan lily, on 23 November 2024 - 06:55 PM, said:

Very much a response I expect from you
Swans are a protected species but obviously that means nothing to the savages that will kill and eat anything
Anyone that kills a swan can expect a very harsh sentence, however as we all know these savages will play the ignorance card.

Do you think charges will follow?

[Blue roan lily]

Mr Mercury, on 23 November 2024 - 07:19 PM, said:

Do you think charges will follow?

They ought to mate
BUT its the usual suspects crew so probably not

[calvin plummers socks]

Blue roan lily, on 23 November 2024 - 06:55 PM, said:

Very much a response I expect from you
Swans are a protected species but obviously that means nothing to the savages that will kill and eat anything
Anyone that kills a swan can expect a very harsh sentence, however as we all know these savages will play the ignorance card.

So these are savages.

Presumably you think exactly the same of the posh toffs like the royals who shoot birds out of the sky for a jest?

[Misnomer]

Search & Destroy, on 23 November 2024 - 01:38 PM, said:

https://uknip.co.uk/...arina-cheshire/

Absolute filth. Obviously, they'll get away with it because, THEY are now the protected species....

And, look who's popped his head up to make out it's a 'nothing' issue (despite it being a criminal offence), just like he did with the grooming gangs....

[calvin plummers socks]

Misnomer, on 23 November 2024 - 08:27 PM, said:

Absolute filth. Obviously, they'll get away with it because, THEY are now the protected species....

And, look who's popped his head up to make out it's a 'nothing' issue (despite it being a criminal offence), just like he did with the grooming gangs....

Ok - so this is you repeating again that I?ve defended grooming gangs.
That?s a step too far -again.
Obviously libellous.
I?d love to know your rationale for that other than your overt racism and ignorance.
What a nasty hateful piece of work.
You?re the 2nd who has said this or similar.
Interesting