[s42blue]

s42blue, on 07 November 2024 - 08:35 PM, said:

Of whatever race or religion.

What conclusion have you reached and trying to make? What would you like to do about it? Genuine Q, I?m trying to understand. At the moment it?s just a statistic

S&D?

[Snowflake McBedwetter]

BUMP!

This one's really going to kick off in a big way sooner rather than later. Not going to look great for 'Two Tier' in the very, very near future.

Can't see him surviving this.

#ItsAfamilyAFFAIR

This post has been edited by Snowflake McBedwetter: 17 November 2024 - 11:58 PM

[Westbars Spireite]

Southport related?

[Mr Mercury]

Huge?

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 18 November 2024 - 08:22 AM

[Search & Destroy]

Mr Mercury, on 18 November 2024 - 08:21 AM, said:

Huge?

All over X

[oldgoat]

All over X so it must be true then

[Valley Blues]

Social media seems to suggest Starmer was directly involved with keeping the father of this piece of filth in the UK when he was wanted in his home country for being involved in over 100 murders, or along those lines.

But social media is very often wrong.

Let?s hope so for Starmers sake.

[JonB]

Valley Blues, on 18 November 2024 - 08:55 AM, said:

Social media seems to suggest Starmer was directly involved with keeping the father of this piece of filth in the UK when he was wanted in his home country for being involved in over 100 murders, or along those lines.

But social media is very often wrong.

Let?s hope so for Starmers sake.

I've seen some posts along similar lines all with community notes underneath saying they have got the fathers name wrong so the posts are incorrect. Starmer was involved with the case of another guy with the same first name but different surname.

[Valley Blues]

JonB, on 18 November 2024 - 09:01 AM, said:

I've seen some posts along similar lines all with community notes underneath saying they have got the fathers name wrong so the posts are incorrect. Starmer was involved with the case of another guy with the same first name but different surname.

Social media, unfortunately.

Take it all with a pinch of salt.

[JonB]

Valley Blues, on 18 November 2024 - 10:03 AM, said:

Social media, unfortunately.

Take it all with a pinch of salt.

Oh yes massively....Lots will ignore the community note that its incorrect, many will just post on without paying full attention and plenty will push the story as it suits their agendas.

[calvin plummers socks]

My twittter is just full of right wing ?social commentators? (!)
It?s a very toxic place with everyone baying for blood but getting very angry at everything.
They want Starmer?s blood (let him do his job ffs)

They are angry about some tattoed idiots getting jailed for posting sh77e. (People they wouldn?t ever want to talk to in real life).

This post has been edited by calvin plummers socks: 18 November 2024 - 10:40 AM

[dtp]

The truth will eventually have to come out.

But, it does not help when at the time of this atrocity some postings on social media were closer to the truth than that put out by the establishment that the perpetrator was a Welsh choir boy. On top of that the Speaker has not allowed Parliament to question when SKS and YC knew that the attack was terrorist related. Such questions would not affect the trial but would scrutinise as to why there appears to be some sort of cover up especially when the timing of the release of the information appears to be an attempt to bury bad news.

[frearsghost]

I recall that when the Southport suspect was arrested the police made a statement saying the incident was not terror related. Were they instructed to say this? If so by whom?

[Snowflake McBedwetter]

JonB, on 18 November 2024 - 09:01 AM, said:

I've seen some posts along similar lines all with community notes underneath saying they have got the fathers name wrong so the posts are incorrect. Starmer was involved with the case of another guy with the same first name but different surname.

Do you think a man fleeing his native country for crimes against humanity might change his name?

[calvin plummers socks]

Snowflake McBedwetter, on 17 November 2024 - 11:57 PM, said:

BUMP!

This one's really going to kick off in a big way sooner rather than later. Not going to look great for 'Two Tier' in the very, very near future.

Can't see him surviving this.

#ItsAfamilyAFFAIR

What?s happening?

[Burgerman]

calvin plummers socks, on 20 November 2024 - 01:06 PM, said:

What?s happening?

Serious question. When was the last time you posted about a game CFC were involved in that you actually went to?

[calvin plummers socks]

Burgerman, on 20 November 2024 - 01:20 PM, said:

Serious question. When was the last time you posted about a game CFC were involved in that you actually went to?

Wtf has it got to do with you?

I?ve been to 3 this season (Town), about 30 others (non Town)

[Burgerman]

calvin plummers socks, on 20 November 2024 - 01:25 PM, said:

Wtf has it got to do with you?

I?ve been to 3 this season (Town), about 30 others (non Town)

I am just trying to weigh up if you're a troll or not and you just cleared it up for me, you're not the only one by the way.

I have never seen you discuss performances on the pitch (good or bad) or ever discuss any of our players. It is a football forum after all.

[azul]

calvin plummers socks, on 20 November 2024 - 01:06 PM, said:

What?s happening?

I suspect he is on about a viral social media rumour that Starrmer represented Rudakubana?s father in 2003.

Downing Street has denied it - for what it is worth it should not be hard to prove whether the rumour is true or not.

This post has been edited by azul: 20 November 2024 - 01:44 PM

[azul]

JonB, on 18 November 2024 - 09:01 AM, said:

I've seen some posts along similar lines all with community notes underneath saying they have got the fathers name wrong so the posts are incorrect. Starmer was involved with the case of another guy with the same first name but different surname.

It won't stop those wanting to believe from believing.

This post has been edited by azul: 20 November 2024 - 01:52 PM