[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Mr Mercury, on 07 October 2024 - 06:03 PM, said:

Not at all, it was a conversation a million miles away from what?s you think.


How long did Lineker house his token immigrant for?
Who?s classing the homeless as lazy freckless scroungers?

Errr, this bloke...

https://leftfootforw...%E2%80%99%20who

Oh, and here's what the creep you've regularly deemed readable said about 'heat and eat'...

https://www.thelondo...moaning%20about

This post has been edited by The Earl of Chesterfield: 07 October 2024 - 06:13 PM

[Mr Mercury]

The Earl of Chesterfield, on 07 October 2024 - 06:12 PM, said:

Errr, this bloke...

https://leftfootforw...%E2%80%99%20who

Oh, and here's what the creep you've regularly deemed readable said about 'heat and eat'...

https://www.thelondo...moaning%20about

That?s their view not mine. I?ve never classed the homeless as that. And I?m quite happy to say pensioners will have to make a choice between heat and eat because they will.
What about you endorsing that creep Starmer who’s removing the WFA? Your creep actually makes the decisions. And your creep of a Chancellor who made the decision.
They?re the real creeps. What about them?

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 07 October 2024 - 06:34 PM

[calvin plummers socks]

Mr Mercury, on 07 October 2024 - 06:03 PM, said:

Not at all, it was a conversation a million miles away from what?s you think.


How long did Lineker house his token immigrant for? And does caring about something means you have to provide shelter and not help in other ways?
Who?s classing the homeless as lazy freckless scroungers?

The fact he gave his house and money to someone more needy is now ridiculed by idiots.
What a horrible place this has become

[Mr Mercury]

Anyway after the attempted diversion of the thread?
Unbelievably the suspect who threw acid over school girls in London, a story that somehow mayor Khan never acknowledged and the MSM only touched on, causing one child life changing injuries, has been released on bail.

[calvin plummers socks]

Mr Mercury, on 07 October 2024 - 07:05 PM, said:

Anyway after the attempted diversion of the thread?
Unbelievably the suspect who threw acid over school girls in London, a story that somehow mayor Khan never acknowledged and the MSM only touched on, causing one child life changing injuries, has been released on bail.

The Mayor isn?t there to keep people like you 150 miles away satisfied

[azul]

Mr Mercury, on 07 October 2024 - 07:05 PM, said:

Anyway after the attempted diversion of the thread?
Unbelievably the suspect who threw acid over school girls in London, a story that somehow mayor Khan never acknowledged and the MSM only touched on, causing one child life changing injuries, has been released on bail.

What are people are supposed to be diverting from? Some scatter gun ramblings of an angry feral old man!

[Mr Mercury]

azul, on 07 October 2024 - 08:18 PM, said:

What are people are supposed to be diverting from? Some scatter gun ramblings of an angry feral old man!

No comments on the acid thrower?

[azul]

Mr Mercury, on 07 October 2024 - 08:28 PM, said:

No comments on the acid thrower?

Throwing acid at people is cowardly and wrong

[Mr Mercury]

azul, on 07 October 2024 - 08:35 PM, said:

Throwing acid at people is cowardly and wrong

Cowardly and wrong? I?d say it?s akin to attempted murder and to be released on bail after doing it is an abhorrent decision.

[azul]

Mr Mercury, on 07 October 2024 - 06:16 PM, said:

That?s their view not mine. I?ve never classed the homeless as that. And I?m quite happy to say pensioners will have to make a choice between heat and eat because they will.
What about you endorsing that creep Starmer who?s removing the WFA? Your creep actually makes the decisions. And your creep of a Chancellor who made the decision.
They?re the real creeps. What about them?

You swallow that kind of mierda and regurgitate it on here on a daily basis - mierda wouldn't melt in your mouth

This post has been edited by azul: 07 October 2024 - 08:57 PM

[Mr Mercury]

azul, on 07 October 2024 - 08:57 PM, said:

You swallow that kind of mierda and regurgitate it on here on a daily basis - mierda wouldn't melt in your mouth

So who?s the real creep. Someone who has a right wing view or someone who has the power to decide who lives and dies by deciding policy?

[Westbars Spireite]

Where was your concern for working families who were the 'losers' under Tory rule? Seems the pensioners did quite nicely during that time. With your natural caring nature there will be lots of posts to pick from presumably.

https://bmmagazine.c...benefit-report/

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Westbars Spireite, on 08 October 2024 - 07:05 AM, said:

Where was your concern for working families who were the 'losers' under Tory rule? Seems the pensioners did quite nicely during that time. With your natural caring nature there will be lots of posts to pick from presumably.

https://bmmagazine.c...benefit-report/

Perhaps the conversation our friend 'MrM' had with the intellectual titan Anderson discussed how the pensioners he's now wringing his hands raw over could eat for thirty pence per meal.

Which seemed a perfectly acceptable assertion when applying to everyone else...

[calvin plummers socks]

Mr Mercury, on 07 October 2024 - 05:51 PM, said:

Had a chat with Lee Anderson a few weeks ago. Very approachable.

lol that must have been a high brow chat!
Like 2 ferrets in a gutter

[Mr Mercury]

Always nice to actually engage with a local politician who?s got time for a chat unlike my own Labour MP who hasn?t even got the decency to reply to an email.

[Mr Mercury]

Walking headlong into disaster for our kids and our kids kids, thankfully, and rather selfishly, I?ll be long gone when this disaster really unfolds.
https://news.sky.com...s-says-13230157

This post has been edited by Mr Mercury: 08 October 2024 - 08:19 PM

[PontePete]

PontePete, on 07 August 2024 - 12:54 PM, said:

Well it did happen to black people we all know it and still does to a degree, particularly with the Met for example, and it?s abhorrent.

But bringing it back to the current situation, that doesn?t mean it?s right that it should apply now but in reverse. Per my original post, justice should be treating everyone equally, so why no charges against the di**head who broke a female copper?s nose and assaulted several other coppers?

There?s little wonder that people use phrases like ?2 tier policing? when you consider the above example, and I don?t see how it can be deemed idiotic in any way. Still, I?m sure good old Keir will prove everyone levelling these accusations of 2 tier policing completely wrong in due course, won?t he?

Just seems a little strange that no charges have been brought for multiple assaults that happened a couple of weeks ago, but the rioters in the events in the last week or so have been fast tracked through the courts and jailed already?

Over to you Starmer, here?s your chance to step up.

So then, after 3 months with no charges, Reform are now saying they?ll bring a private criminal prosecution against the Manchester Airport thugs, seemingly because they?d drawn a conclusion that no criminal action would be taken by the CPS.

https://x.com/talktv...zwVGbzYK-eAFNYA

Whilst I agree with the sentiment, that could open up a Pandora?s box.

Any mention of this anywhere on mainstream media? (Genuine question btw)

[Goku]

PontePete, on 09 October 2024 - 07:46 AM, said:

So then, after 3 months with no charges, Reform are now saying they?ll bring a private criminal prosecution against the Manchester Airport thugs, seemingly because they?d drawn a conclusion that no criminal action would be taken by the CPS.

https://x.com/talktv...zwVGbzYK-eAFNYA

Whilst I agree with the sentiment, that could open up a Pandora?s box.

Any mention of this anywhere on mainstream media? (Genuine question btw)

They are saying they will proceed if the men aren?t charged by the CPS. The men will be charged, so it?s posturing. Also quite sinister that a political party are borderline interfering with a police investigation.. bunch of absolute wrong ?uns.

But don?t forget to chuck them a tenner for their grift if you?re an absolute sap, folks.

[s42blue]

Goku, on 09 October 2024 - 08:17 AM, said:

They are saying they will proceed if the men aren?t charged by the CPS. The men will be charged, so it?s posturing. Also quite sinister that a political party are borderline interfering with a police investigation.. bunch of absolute wrong ?uns.

But don?t forget to chuck them a tenner for their grift if you?re an absolute sap, folks.

I agree. Clever PR by them though to raise a dipping profile. They?ll claim they put pressure on CPS (not Socks) and claim as a victory.

[azul]

PontePete, on 09 October 2024 - 07:46 AM, said:

So then, after 3 months with no charges, Reform are now saying they?ll bring a private criminal prosecution against the Manchester Airport thugs, seemingly because they?d drawn a conclusion that no criminal action would be taken by the CPS.

https://x.com/talktv...zwVGbzYK-eAFNYA

Whilst I agree with the sentiment, that could open up a Pandora?s box.

Any mention of this anywhere on mainstream media? (Genuine question btw)

Blimey, it was all over the mainstream media yesterday! How did you miss it but find it on twitter?

Anyway I concur with the others, it is nothing but cynical ploy. I know it is hard to believe coming from such a bastion of justice as Reform.