Manfred Archie Mac Gerbil, on 30 October 2023 - 04:42 PM, said:
You’re absolutely wrong and here are the reasons why:
1) I don’t need to produce FACTS to repeat an obituary that’s been reported in the media.
2) It’s not actually necessary to provide a link to every statement you make.
3) I’m merely stating that this man was promoting an alleged life saving vaccine and 3 years later he’s dead in a bath tub.
PS the media originally announced he’d died from cardio difficulties and the following day apparently he’s drowned, wonder why eh.
How can I be wrong when I didn’t state an opinion? I asked for facts. Remember first year chemistry at school? Title, apparatus, method, results, conclusion. You skip to conclusion…
No there’s definitely an obituary and I believe he’s dead. True I haven’t seen his dead body before you ask…
No it’s not actually necessary…but it gives an argument when you’re putting it as supposition credibility.
And again “merely stating”…so basically saying nothing.
The media …hmm who rely on what they hear from sources. Putin had a heart attack last week, the Queen died 3 times on Twitter , papers issue apologies all the time when they’re wrong.
"Can't change or choose your football club. Sorry son"