The Earl of Chesterfield, on 19 November 2022 - 09:01 PM, said:
Of course it's Chris, Mick. You know it is. And I stand by each and every one of my posts ridiculing our little neighbours. Because they deserved 'em. But if y'wanna attach some sorta similar rivalry to an outfit far more tin pot than they'll ever be, bereft of the historical socio-political issues dividing our two towns, then be my guest.
However taking the step back I suggested from today's game, I give credit to Solihull for playing football. From the back. In the same way we do. Which then allowed us to be better at it. Did Osborne try to influence the Ref'? Of course he did. Were they in his face after every decision? Again, of course they were. Yet thankfully we had a bloke in the middle who ignored their sh*thousery.
So again as I suggested we must surely return to our real rivals. Wrexham and Notts. Who watching today's game must surely realise we can still deliver football lessons despite King falling below the high standards he's set. Dobra not quite at his best. A much maligned Quigley once again proving he's not a 'natural' goalscorer.
Or on the other hand previously sidelined players like Whelan covering every blade of grass and deserving their standing ovation after being subbed. For an Akniola who did so much to create our second goal. Not to mention raw talents such as 'Jez' coming on and assiduously adding to the Cook-esque team ethic.
I know the 'Tup's your manor. Infact I'm pleased for you it's re-opened. Yet unless a certain pro Carson and Co character who claimed summat similar - before performing a full retreat when genuine regulars such as your good self suggested he introduce himself - is prepared to join us in a friendly beer, I'll politely decline a masturbation of any anti National League prejudices therein.
Mate, we know what these clowns are all about. They revel in visiting our forum and discovering they're some sorta David to our Goliath. I'm not gonna give 'em that satisfation. Infact I'll simply offer credit where it'd due as we rise above fifth tier trivialities...
Yes, of course I knew it you was Chris, I was emphasising my suprise at your stance on not questioning opponents shortcomings (I'm being polite) on a football message board, I'd like to think that's what they're for. I wouldn't be too concerned re these teams taking the p.. I had a look on their MB and found that we probably have more match related threads (😒) after a defeat than they have posts (16) on their current match thread.
I've never considered soilyhull a rival, I consider them to be a club that epitomises all that is wrong with this league, but unlike bromley and boredom whose sh..housery rests with inadequate coaches, soilyhulls comes from the top, as was seen with last season off field anatics.
Yesterday was like a breath of fresh air, good ref and TV cameras helped to curtail their normal on field tactics and being away meant their directors had no input.
You do the locals of the Tup a disservice, if the only incentive to go there was to have a chat with a chap who you know ain't going to show, says little for the ale or even the Moretti. Oh and many will testify that conversations in that establishment doesn't revolve round slagging (a better choice of word) off of opponents tactics.
You've got to love irony, so that finish a little gem found whilst perusing the soilyhull message board. "Their play acting and other antics today went completely unpunished and were not only blatant but laughable. Shysterfield FC indeed".🤣🤣
Solihull a club rotten from the top