Rowe Charged !!
#161
Posted 07 November 2022 - 01:42 PM
#163
Posted 07 November 2022 - 01:49 PM
spireitetoo, on 07 November 2022 - 01:42 PM, said:
The report is by BBC East Midlands on the BBC Derby pages and were his most high-profile position to date.
#165
Posted 07 November 2022 - 02:16 PM
Sammy Spireite, on 07 November 2022 - 01:49 PM, said:
I think it's a bit shìtty that it's always our clubs name that gets dragged into it, even tho as soon as the club was aware they dealt with it..
#166
Posted 07 November 2022 - 02:31 PM
spireitetoo, on 07 November 2022 - 01:42 PM, said:
We are a much more significant club.
#167
Posted 07 November 2022 - 02:54 PM
spireitetoo, on 07 November 2022 - 01:42 PM, said:
We're a much bigger name and he was here when it happened.
Quaker, on 07 November 2022 - 01:53 PM, said:
In the photos outside the court I notice he's not wearing a wedding ring. Was/is he married?
I believe so, yes.
#168
Posted 07 November 2022 - 02:58 PM
Siberian Spireite, on 07 November 2022 - 02:31 PM, said:
Also reminds people that the Trust acted in good faith
Some people will need to be reminded constantly. Having said that where is S&D these days
#169
Posted 07 November 2022 - 03:10 PM
Quaker, on 07 November 2022 - 01:53 PM, said:
In the photos outside the court I notice he's not wearing a wedding ring. Was/is he married?
Don't think they were married. I seem to remember when the club announced his son had been born, they said congratulations to him and his partner.
#170
Posted 07 November 2022 - 03:24 PM
#172
Posted 07 November 2022 - 05:59 PM
Misnomer, on 07 November 2022 - 05:55 PM, said:
Simple way around it is to say, person A did ..........to person B.
You know better than to encourage people to answer that.
#173
Posted 07 November 2022 - 06:01 PM
Misnomer, on 07 November 2022 - 05:55 PM, said:
Simple way around it is to say, person A did ..........to person B.
See report on Derbyshire times thread
#174
Posted 07 November 2022 - 06:36 PM
Misnomer, on 07 November 2022 - 05:55 PM, said:
Simple way around it is to say, person A did ..........to person B.
That's absolutely not a simple way around defamation when his name is in the thread title. Quite easily ascertainable
#177
Posted 07 November 2022 - 08:03 PM
Westbars Spireite, on 07 November 2022 - 05:59 PM, said:
Unfortunately not.
Though it's good to see this and another post added to his long list of deletions.
The Fylde Flasher Fanboy tried summat similar - and we all know how that ended - but what can be reported has been, so for the sake of both the victim and integrity of the prosecution let's all be adult about this...