Bob's Board: Our Next Prime Minister? - Bob's Board

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Our Next Prime Minister? Rate Topic: -----

#41 User is offline   Westbars Spireite 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 66,741
  • Joined: 18-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield, Derbyshire
  • Interests:Chesterfield FC, cricket, beer

Posted 05 April 2020 - 11:45 AM

View Poststevie_b, on 05 April 2020 - 11:37 AM, said:

Thank you for this. Just so pleased that somebody gets the woman/transwoman debate. I'm female: a biological woman. There's a world of difference between me and a transwoman.


I can't believe anyone would seriously suggest otherwise.
0

#42 User is offline   stevie_b 

  • First Team Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,752
  • Joined: 16-December 08
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Steel City

Posted 05 April 2020 - 12:30 PM

View PostWestbars Spireite, on 05 April 2020 - 11:45 AM, said:

I can't believe anyone would seriously suggest otherwise.



Look around you. The Trans Rights Movement suggests so and the woke movement in the workplace doesn't know how to deal with it. I could potentially lose my job for my view that "transwomen are not women" Am I prepared to lose my job? Yes. I speak the truth. I am NOT hateful. I speak up for women.

I have no issue with transwomen. In my team at work? Fine. In the pub, chatting with me? Fine. Sitting next to me on the kop? Fine. But they are not female and so I don't expect to find them in my safe spaces. Or, more pertinently for me, in my sport.

If they allow transwomen to compete in my field I can kiss goodbye to ever winning any of my competitions. How is that fair?

Have a look at Laurel Hubbard. She may get to compete as a woman in the Olympics next year. How is that fair?

Please support women. We matter.

This post has been edited by stevie_b: 05 April 2020 - 12:30 PM

1

#43 User is online   Mr Mercury 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 39,417
  • Joined: 06-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:My family and Chesterfield then anything else that I care to chance my arm at.

Posted 05 April 2020 - 12:54 PM

View Postmr. smith, on 04 April 2020 - 11:29 PM, said:

You give them too much credit.

If only Labour had at the last election!

View Poststevie_b, on 05 April 2020 - 12:30 PM, said:

Look around you. The Trans Rights Movement suggests so and the woke movement in the workplace doesn't know how to deal with it. I could potentially lose my job for my view that "transwomen are not women" Am I prepared to lose my job? Yes. I speak the truth. I am NOT hateful. I speak up for women.

I have no issue with transwomen. In my team at work? Fine. In the pub, chatting with me? Fine. Sitting next to me on the kop? Fine. But they are not female and so I don't expect to find them in my safe spaces. Or, more pertinently for me, in my sport.

If they allow transwomen to compete in my field I can kiss goodbye to ever winning any of my competitions. How is that fair?

Have a look at Laurel Hubbard. She may get to compete as a woman in the Olympics next year. How is that fair?

Please support women. We matter.

Excellent post.
East stand second class citizen.
0

#44 User is offline   The Earl of Chesterfield 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 27,178
  • Joined: 24-February 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:With the Rainbow People

Posted 05 April 2020 - 01:08 PM

View PostCFC91, on 05 April 2020 - 10:21 AM, said:

How is it **** poor and how much different do you the opposition response would have been had it won the election? Like Brexit, like the election the opposition to me seems to be full of criticism but not very good at offering reasonable, rationale solutions.

I think from reading social media (which in the run up to the election and Brexit was very left wing / remain to the put you’d think the results would be totally different) most people seem to think the economic package for the employed, the vulnerable and self employed to protect people’s incomes, homes, families etc (the thing most every day person cares about) is very good, and not something you’d have expected from a Tory government. There is the expectation that we will be paying this back for years to come, and the economic landscape will be changes for years.

Sunak and co have done as much as they could in my opinion, over a short space of time to implement a system and get it up and running. I don’t think it’s **** poor at all, its surprisingly good and will help out a lot of my friends who I know were ******* themselves for want of a better phrase.

As for the lack of equipment, ordinarily any country wouldn’t have required the volume of ventilators, testing equipment etc for a normal winter so stockpiling this kind of stuff for a once in a century outbreak makes no sense, but that’s been outlined a few times already on this thread.

I’ll be suprised if we are up to 100,000 test per day by the end of the month but as long as we’re testing the people that need to be tested which we are beginning to do so then that is enough - as much as I’d love a test as I believe I could have had it so I can go back outside, it’s not important and I am happy following government guidelines until necessary.

I think some political views are clouding people’s judgements and to take a step back and be impartial in a situation like this helps give a bit of context about what we are up against, and how we are doing.


I've repeatedly given Sunak credit. Okay, there're still groups claiming they're left behind - the self employed paying themselves through dividends, for example - but he's been the most direct and decisive of the Cabinet.

You simply cannot treat the start of this crisis as some 'year zero' though, you can't just absolve politicians from their previous. Years of mocking and ridiculing and opposing public spending increases and creating a 'hostile environment' for the migrants so often doing our dirty work. They had warnings too, in the form of 'Exercise Cygnus' - https://www.telegrap...ied-government/ - and their own figures which showed the NHS a hundred thousand staff short for even 'normal' seasonal epidemics.

Yet whilst the far east was being consumed by Corona Johnson was hosting Tory Party fundraisers. Whilst Europe was going into lockdown we were being told 'keep calm and wash your hands'. Whilst the EU were procuring ventilators we were snubbing their offers. Or 'missing' e-mails. Or insisting Brexit supporting businesses could quickly churn them out. Infact this PM didn't even chair a COBRA meeting until the beginning of March. Which he took so seriously he used it to taunt his opposite number at PMQ's.

Then 'as long as we’re testing the people that need to be tested which we are beginning to do so then that is enough'? Really? Months into the crisis and after minister after minister made false promise after false promise? After the WHO told countries to 'TEST! TEST! TEST! all along? And exactly who decides those that 'need testing'? Good grief man, it's the frontline staff who're seeing their colleagues fall ill and in some cases die who're saying that's pi** poor, not just the 'politically clouded'!

Also remember it was 'honest' Boris himself who claimed PPE was stockpiled and there'd be hundreds of thousands being tested by now.

I don't know how alternative incumbents would've handled things. The fact Johnson's only just invited them to share input after barring, say, the Mayor of London from early COBRA meetings didn't give them chance, either. But whilst the majority might have some financial foundation I wonder how many suffering all too typical incompetence and, well, let's call them 'contradictions' are judging the current crew's response...

This post has been edited by The Earl of Chesterfield: 05 April 2020 - 01:14 PM

Never underestimate the stupidity of people
-1

#45 User is offline   Westbars Spireite 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 66,741
  • Joined: 18-September 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chesterfield, Derbyshire
  • Interests:Chesterfield FC, cricket, beer

Posted 05 April 2020 - 01:24 PM

View Poststevie_b, on 05 April 2020 - 12:30 PM, said:

Look around you. The Trans Rights Movement suggests so and the woke movement in the workplace doesn't know how to deal with it. I could potentially lose my job for my view that "transwomen are not women" Am I prepared to lose my job? Yes. I speak the truth. I am NOT hateful. I speak up for women.

I have no issue with transwomen. In my team at work? Fine. In the pub, chatting with me? Fine. Sitting next to me on the kop? Fine. But they are not female and so I don't expect to find them in my safe spaces. Or, more pertinently for me, in my sport.

If they allow transwomen to compete in my field I can kiss goodbye to ever winning any of my competitions. How is that fair?

Have a look at Laurel Hubbard. She may get to compete as a woman in the Olympics next year. How is that fair?

Please support women. We matter.


I completely agree. It's nonsense and thankfully I haven't had to deal with it personally.
0

#46 User is offline   Wooden Spoon 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43,905
  • Joined: 07-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 April 2020 - 07:13 PM

stevie_b said:

1586089807[/url]' post='1513598']
Look around you. The Trans Rights Movement suggests so and the woke movement in the workplace doesn't know how to deal with it. I could potentially lose my job for my view that "transwomen are not women" Am I prepared to lose my job? Yes. I speak the truth. I am NOT hateful. I speak up for women.

I have no issue with transwomen. In my team at work? Fine. In the pub, chatting with me? Fine. Sitting next to me on the kop? Fine. But they are not female and so I don't expect to find them in my safe spaces. Or, more pertinently for me, in my sport.

If they allow transwomen to compete in my field I can kiss goodbye to ever winning any of my competitions. How is that fair?

Have a look at Laurel Hubbard. She may get to compete as a woman in the Olympics next year. How is that fair?

Please support women. We matter.


That’s an excellent post, agree 100%.





The Labour Party would normally be the natural place for minorities of almost any demographic to gravitate to anyway. They really don’t need to try to be the spokes people for the demographic at the expense of common sense. A trans woman isn’t the same as a biological woman. It just gives ammunition to those who accuse the movement of being “the loony left” rather than the party of the working man, of social freedom and fairness.












And at times it’s really difficult to deny the “loony left” don’t have hands on the levers within the party at times. HBs reference to Nandy for example.










A new hope.
0

#47 User is offline   spireitetoo 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 20,045
  • Joined: 31-December 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:the end of my tether

Posted 06 April 2020 - 08:43 AM

Unfortunately for the Labour Party, all general elections now are more about personality contests, (probably brought about by all the talent shows on TV) rather than actual policies, and starmer has non, he sends me to sleep everytime he turns up on TV,... Boris will have him for brekkie...
all we are saying, is give us ...a goal, or 2+
0

#48 User is offline   mr. smith 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11,844
  • Joined: 06-June 05

Posted 06 April 2020 - 09:08 AM

View Postspireitetoo, on 06 April 2020 - 08:43 AM, said:

Unfortunately for the Labour Party, all general elections now are more about personality contests, (probably brought about by all the talent shows on TV) rather than actual policies, and starmer has non, he sends me to sleep everytime he turns up on TV,... Boris will have him for brekkie...



don't fancy Johnson being leader by next election.
0

#49 User is offline   azul 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36,731
  • Joined: 15-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 April 2020 - 01:37 PM

View Postspireitetoo, on 06 April 2020 - 08:43 AM, said:

Unfortunately for the Labour Party, all general elections now are more about personality contests, (probably brought about by all the talent shows on TV) rather than actual policies, and starmer has non, he sends me to sleep everytime he turns up on TV,... Boris will have him for brekkie...

Fashion changes, you never know, bumbling toffs might be out, intellegence and sincerity might be in
Accentuate th Positive, eliminate the negative
0

#50 User is offline   azul 

  • Legend
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36,731
  • Joined: 15-June 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 April 2020 - 01:39 PM

View Postmr. smith, on 06 April 2020 - 09:08 AM, said:

don't fancy Johnson being leader by next election.

Why, do you think the puppet masters will cut his strings or that his lifestyle may see his demise?

Is anyone #ReadyForRabb

This post has been edited by azul: 06 April 2020 - 01:44 PM

Accentuate th Positive, eliminate the negative
0

Share this topic:


  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users