This post has been edited by Benno Spire: 29 June 2019 - 09:34 AM
The Cricket Thread Summer 2012
#2821
Posted 29 June 2019 - 09:34 AM
#2822
Posted 29 June 2019 - 10:35 AM
Benno Spire, on 29 June 2019 - 09:34 AM, said:
Do you actually think that Virat Kohli or MS Dhoni would ever let that scenario come to pass. They'd rip of their arms and beat you with the wet end before ever letting their team deliberately under perform in any match.
#2823
Posted 11 July 2019 - 04:24 PM
Aussies hammered.
Excellent performance in every department.
A tiny complaint? Bairstow's stupid review.
Daft thing is after all the talk of tosses being crucial being told to bowl during the only period the pitch actually offered owt probably helped.
#2824
Posted 11 July 2019 - 07:09 PM
#2825
Posted 12 July 2019 - 03:59 AM
#2826
Posted 12 July 2019 - 07:58 AM
#2828
Posted 14 July 2019 - 06:50 PM
Search and Destroy, on 14 July 2019 - 06:11 PM, said:
Sat through every ball and didn't think we'd win until the final run out!
#2829
Posted 14 July 2019 - 06:53 PM
Mr Mercury, on 14 July 2019 - 06:50 PM, said:
Same here but well done England
#2830
Posted 14 July 2019 - 06:57 PM
#2831
Posted 14 July 2019 - 07:02 PM
#2832
Posted 14 July 2019 - 08:10 PM
Search and Destroy, on 14 July 2019 - 06:11 PM, said:
Sat through every ball and didn't think we'd win until the final run out!
#2833
Posted 14 July 2019 - 09:21 PM
quote name='Siberian Spireite' timestamp='1563130640' post='1473913']
Fantastic match but why at the end when the scores were tied at 241, didn't the number of fallen wickets break the tie? Them's just the rules?
[/quote]
Rules these days mean super over... ie extra time. Pretty much the norm these days.
#2835
Posted 15 July 2019 - 04:48 AM
Siberian Spireite, on 14 July 2019 - 06:57 PM, said:
Laws, dear boy, Laws!
#2837
Posted 15 July 2019 - 07:58 AM
Johnnyspireite7, on 15 July 2019 - 04:48 AM, said:
Rules, dear boy, Rules!
The conclusion of the match were guided by competition rules, relevant to that specific competition and not covered in "The Laws of the game"
You'll have to accept that folk from Siberia know more about cricket than yorkshiremen!!!!
This post has been edited by clarevoyant.: 15 July 2019 - 08:09 AM
Yorkshire is Yorkshire
Never the twain shall meet.
Again
#2838
Posted 15 July 2019 - 12:17 PM
clarevoyant., on 15 July 2019 - 07:58 AM, said:
The conclusion of the match were guided by competition rules, relevant to that specific competition and not covered in "The Laws of the game"
You'll have to accept that folk from Siberia know more about cricket than yorkshiremen!!!!
Agreed 100%. This type of cricket is all about slogging fours and sixes. That's what the public turn up to see. Totally appropriate that the winners should be the team that hit the most.
This post has been edited by frearsghost: 15 July 2019 - 12:31 PM
#2839
Posted 15 July 2019 - 12:55 PM
#2840
Posted 15 July 2019 - 05:02 PM
You just can't write drama like that - and watched by millions for free!
Chuffed to bits we won, absolute respect for how NZ handled themselves - on and off the field - and a thoroughly enjoyable tournament from start to finish.
One thing, though.
This England team have the batting and bowling to destroy opponents - but their Achilles heel is knocking those ones and twos that keep the scoreboard ticking.
Summat for Bayliss's successor to work on.