h again said:
1507063763[/url]' post='1336020']
Or the owner who paid for our nice new stadium and continues to put his hand in his pocket on a regular basis. If he DID walk out we'd be non-league and playing at Somersall, but don't let that stop your whingeathon.
Ashley Carson quote, from the Derbyshire times -
'The rot has got to stop somewhere, the club at the moment is just imploding, it's been destroyed and it's just so wrong.'
Who's responsible for this rot? For the implosion? Who's destroyed the club?
And just a little reminder -
h again said:
1421881594[/url]' post='1076475']
Well, since he [Chris Turner]took over he's completely revolutionised the clubs non-playing structure, he's acquired a scouting and youth training set-up second to none at this level and some way above, and done it all without increasing the debt to anything unmanageable or even significantly higher.
By any measure that I can see we're a successful business - it doesn't come through luck.
This is, don't forget, the youth training venture Turner and Sutcliffe set up and left local families hundreds of pounds out of pocket.
h again said:
1421953793[/url]' post='1076808']
As for all the other points, which are probably even more important in the long term, it's all CEO territory - the club has been completely re-vamped, not just in personnel but in its outlook. Change doesn't just happen, it has to be driven through against obstacles, and that's the CEO's job.
But the basic question has to be - is the club successful at this moment and in comparison with similar businesses? Well, it looks pretty successful to me, in fact it looks to have the infrastructure of a Championship outfit, quite apart from the football credentials, which transformation I'm sure was in CT's brief from the start.
So successful club - credit to the CEO.
Yep, so successful Turner was sacked, were in the bottom 2 and our debts are now at a level they outweigh the assets. Insolvent.
h again said:
1455998841[/url]' post='1188693']
Well, just returning after a few days to this thread it seems that the CEO has run rings round all the high-flying accountants on here once again
Ultimately the responsibility lies with the owner. These people are his chosen appointments and he chose to stick with them, despite all evidence pointing to unsuitability and a lack of competence.
I can only wonder what motivation you have for supporting such a regime at the club. Perhaps you align your self with thier morals.