Moderators Statement.
#21
Posted 16 May 2017 - 11:20 AM
I'm genuinely gobsmacked by this.
#22
Posted 16 May 2017 - 11:29 AM
#23
Posted 16 May 2017 - 11:37 AM
Dave In Footie Heaven, on 16 May 2017 - 11:29 AM, said:
Same here but unfortunately, guilty or not they'll be associated with it
This post has been edited by azul: 16 May 2017 - 11:37 AM
#25
Posted 16 May 2017 - 11:41 AM
Dave In Footie Heaven, on 16 May 2017 - 11:29 AM, said:
I can dave
#26
Posted 16 May 2017 - 11:47 AM
AC has met Freelander on a number of occasions with others to discuss our concerns about issues at the club, as has been documented on here and I don't recall him ever asking that any of his postings be removed. In fact I don't recall anyone going through the proper channels of reporting his postings. There is no evidence that anyone at the club is involved in this incident.
#27
Posted 16 May 2017 - 11:58 AM
Dave In Footie Heaven, on 16 May 2017 - 11:29 AM, said:
Absolutely nothing surprises me at this football club anymore.
#28
Posted 16 May 2017 - 12:03 PM
moondog, on 16 May 2017 - 11:47 AM, said:
AC has met Freelander on a number of occasions with others to discuss our concerns about issues at the club, as has been documented on here and I don't recall him ever asking that any of his postings be removed. In fact I don't recall anyone going through the proper channels of reporting his postings. There is no evidence that anyone at the club is involved in this incident.
So, who is then?
#30
Posted 16 May 2017 - 12:07 PM
CFC91, on 16 May 2017 - 12:05 PM, said:
who became aware of Freelanders personal details how?
#31
Posted 16 May 2017 - 12:10 PM
Heavy_Soul, on 16 May 2017 - 12:07 PM, said:
No idea. My stab in the dark is that as he has had face to face dealings with the club and officials as part of the investigation then who he was / what his business was has become quite apparent and out in the open so will have been easy to track down.
I think a few on here will know who I am from social media postings etc and vice versa. There is only a select few who like to act totally anonymous on here for whatever reason and F2 and those involved from the start are definitely not ones to hide away
#32
Posted 16 May 2017 - 12:23 PM
Heavy_Soul, on 16 May 2017 - 12:07 PM, said:
F2 has made himself known to most people at the club, indeed AC demanded a list of posters names and pseudonyms prior to agreeing to our meeting with him in November. None of our group baulked at this request nor wanted to hide behind their ID's.
As with any company director (even those of CFC 2001 Ltd), his business and home address are readily available for free on the internet.
#33
Posted 16 May 2017 - 12:24 PM
moondog, on 16 May 2017 - 11:47 AM, said:
AC has met Freelander on a number of occasions with others to discuss our concerns about issues at the club, as has been documented on here and I don't recall him ever asking that any of his postings be removed. In fact I don't recall anyone going through the proper channels of reporting his postings. There is no evidence that anyone at the club is involved in this incident.
Just like nobody else at the club was involved in the James Higgins disaster? I'll take this with a pinch of salt as well thanks, Ashley.
#34
Posted 16 May 2017 - 12:24 PM
moondog, on 16 May 2017 - 11:47 AM, said:
AC has met Freelander on a number of occasions with others to discuss our concerns about issues at the club, as has been documented on here and I don't recall him ever asking that any of his postings be removed. In fact I don't recall anyone going through the proper channels of reporting his postings. There is no evidence that anyone at the club is involved in this incident.
Well, here's an opportunity for the club to earn back some credibility. Come out unequivocally in support of Freelander, offer him any resource at their disposal and help root out these individuals.
#35
Posted 16 May 2017 - 12:31 PM
Phil V 72, on 16 May 2017 - 12:24 PM, said:
Not too sure that would prove anything and could just be used as another cover up. Whoever is at the head of all this is highly unlikely to be found out imo. Somebody's paid good money to these heavy's and they wouldn't have used a nut-job from the local pub. There is no way if caught they are going to spill the beans and will just take the rap that comes with the nature of their profession. If they confessed they are finished in their line of work for good.
This post has been edited by Spireite-Karl: 16 May 2017 - 12:32 PM
#37
Posted 16 May 2017 - 01:05 PM
Spireite-Karl said:
Had they not embraced the likes of Bingham, Al Nasser, Sutcliffe, Fitzgerald and so on, there wouldn't have been anything for F2 to dig into.
For me, the blame and responsibility lies firmly st the feet of the dee dahs.
This post has been edited by a kick in the balls: 16 May 2017 - 01:07 PM
#40
Posted 16 May 2017 - 01:25 PM
Spireite-Karl, on 16 May 2017 - 12:31 PM, said:
If the club declined to get behind a supporter in this way, their silence would speak volumes.