[Stockholm Spireite]

moondog, on 03 May 2017 - 03:24 PM, said:

AC has provided the following explanation regarding the bank account access


" 1 - For clarification, until about a year ago, because like everything else, the Development Centre had been classed by Barclays as part of the Club, hence why when we opened our Online Banking their account was linked to our other 4 active accounts.

2 - The Bank Manager was always concerned about the cash and lack of it in the Development Account and he would inform me if there was a problem. I was also able to ask if the account was showing any real credit or on the breadline.

3 - Once the account had been changed and the old account closed we were not able to see a transaction by transaction again, and I never asked the bank for this detail, I would not expect to get it.

4 - However I was issued with their information relating to the PSG Trip as there were several cheques that had been bounced and the Bank informed me of these and confirmed the 2 specific ones relating to the Travel Company"

1 - But AC has told all and sundry that it's never been part of the club. Is he seriously trying to tell us that the bank dictated the DC as part of CFC in financial terms, and CFC had to accept it? Why didn't AC ever separate the finances when he had the golden opportunity?

2 - So AC received financial information abut the DC from the outset, knew the difficulties it was in, but never acted upon it?

3 & 4 - So AC stopped asking under the assumption that he would not get a response, but the bank informed him voluntarily of bounced cheques? That tells us that AC knew of the shenanigans but again refused to act.

Hopeless...

[moondog]

Stockholm Spireite, on 03 May 2017 - 03:48 PM, said:

1 - But AC has told all and sundry that it's never been part of the club. Is he seriously trying to tell us that the bank dictated the DC as part of CFC in financial terms, and CFC had to accept it? Why didn't AC ever separate the finances when he had the golden opportunity?

2 - So AC received financial information abut the DC from the outset, knew the difficulties it was in, but never acted upon it?

3 & 4 - So AC stopped asking under the assumption that he would not get a response, but the bank informed him voluntarily of bounced cheques? That tells us that AC knew of the shenanigans but again refused to act.

Hopeless...

2. He lent them (or LS) £34k

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

So, a firm of solicitors - and CFC sponsors - couldn't separate the Club and CFCFDS when pursuing a CCJ and now we're told Barclays bank - Barclays effing bank, for crying out loud - made a similar mistake?

Well here's a weird-assed theory I've just plucked from thin air - the two businesses were inextricably linked all along despite Town fans being repeatedly told otherwise.

Infact going back to the start of this thread and recalling just who said that and how often might be an interesting exercise...

[Stockholm Spireite]

moondog, on 03 May 2017 - 03:54 PM, said:

2. He lent them (or LS) £34k

I know that, but it's just like putting a plaster over a large, gushing cut. What I mean is, no measures were taken to address or correct the problem.

[spireitenag]

MDCCCLXVI, on 03 May 2017 - 04:06 PM, said:

So, a firm of solicitors - and CFC sponsors - couldn't separate the Club and CFCFDS when pursuing a CCJ and now we're told Barclays bank - Barclays effing bank, for crying out loud - made a similar mistake?

Well here's a weird-assed theory I've just plucked from thin air - the two businesses were inextricably linked all along despite Town fans being repeatedly told otherwise.

Infact going back to the start of this thread and recalling just who said that and how often might be an interesting exercise...

Don't forget Sixt Vehicle Rental made the same mistake as well.

[dim view]

MDCCCLXVI, on 03 May 2017 - 04:06 PM, said:

So, a firm of solicitors - and CFC sponsors - couldn't separate the Club and CFCFDS when pursuing a CCJ and now we're told Barclays bank - Barclays effing bank, for crying out loud - made a similar mistake?

Well here's a weird-assed theory I've just plucked from thin air - the two businesses were inextricably linked all along despite Town fans being repeatedly told otherwise.

Infact going back to the start of this thread and recalling just who said that and how often might be an interesting exercise...

Wor I don't understand is....if the ex-directors had equal status to Ashley at Board meetings, why didn't they see the CFCFDS accounts and do summat?

[moondog]

Stockholm Spireite, on 03 May 2017 - 04:08 PM, said:

I know that, but it's just like putting a plaster over a large, gushing cut. What I mean is, no measures were taken to address or correct the problem.

I know what you meant, just posting a reminder of what happened instead

[warfey is a spireite]

moondog, on 03 May 2017 - 04:13 PM, said:

I know what you meant, just posting a reminder of what happened instead

has freelander been warned off mark

[dim view]

MDCCCLXVI, on 03 May 2017 - 04:06 PM, said:

So, a firm of solicitors - and CFC sponsors - couldn't separate the Club and CFCFDS when pursuing a CCJ and now we're told Barclays bank - Barclays effing bank, for crying out loud - made a similar mistake?

Well here's a weird-assed theory I've just plucked from thin air - the two businesses were inextricably linked all along despite Town fans being repeatedly told otherwise.

Infact going back to the start of this thread and recalling just who said that and how often might be an interesting exercise...

The truth must be that from the start Barclays wouldn't extend credit to Torville and Dean unless CFC acted at guarantors. So Ashley the rotweiler prowls the perimeter fence and regularly chucks Dave Allen's money over it. Why else would he have any interest in what happened at CFCFDS?. No need to tell other directors. No need for the promises of financial independence made to supporters to be re-examined. No need to question unusual payments out of CFCFDS accounts (all 4 of them). No need to investigate why cash flow was so dire in spite of regular large collections being taken from parents. No need to respond to months of written complaints from parents and staff. No need to bother Shorts about it.

[Westbars Spireite]

warfey is a spireite, on 03 May 2017 - 04:37 PM, said:

has freelander been warned off mark

Whatever's happened won't be discussed on here Dave for good reasons. I'm sure in time things will be revealed for all to digest.

[Only Me!]

Westbars Spireite, on 03 May 2017 - 05:47 PM, said:

Whatever's happened won't be discussed on here Dave for good reasons. I'm sure in time things will be revealed for all to digest.

Why won't it be discussed on here...everything else is scrutinised under the microscope for all to comment on...

[Blue95]

dim view, on 03 May 2017 - 03:37 PM, said:

The thick plottens.
That surely is an admission that he knew last year that CFC players had been paid by the DS?
As I've said privately to Ashley, this needs clearing up sharpish.

Not good at clearing things up is Ashley.

[The Black Triangle]

spireitenag, on 03 May 2017 - 03:36 PM, said:

So the club and the DC were linked at least financially then,despite all the denials.

Lies, damn lies, and Carsons lips moving.

[Goku]

Only Me!, on 03 May 2017 - 05:54 PM, said:

Why won't it be discussed on here...everything else is scrutinised under the microscope for all to comment on...

Not everything can be discussed on a public forum

[Only Me!]

Goku, on 03 May 2017 - 06:22 PM, said:

Not everything can be discussed on a public forum

Why not....not a good answer... like everything to do with CFC....more hidden secrets....doesnt look good does it when things are hidden?

I seem to remember Freelander2 saying this all the time....

You see...makes people suspicious doesn't it for the truth...

Double standards....

This post has been edited by Only Me!: 03 May 2017 - 06:30 PM

[DIFH]

And it is often a good ploy to keep your powder dry with certain bits of info.

And it is often a good ploy to keep your powder dry with certain bits of info.

[Wooden Spoon]

Only Me! said:

1493836151[/url]' post='1300846']
Why not....not a good answer... like everything to do with CFC....more hidden secrets....doesnt look good does it when things are hidden?

I seem to remember Freelander2 saying this all the time....

You see...makes people suspicious doesn't it for the truth...

Double standards....

Sometimes circumstances force people to hand over the baton, it could be a whole host of reasons, family reasons, stress, potential ill health.......

[Mrhappy]

Only Me!, on 03 May 2017 - 06:29 PM, said:

Why not....not a good answer... like everything to do with CFC....more hidden secrets....doesnt look good does it when things are hidden?

I seem to remember Freelander2 saying this all the time....

You see...makes people suspicious doesn't it for the truth...

Double standards....

Maybe he's just taking some time out, give the guy a break.

[Only Me!]

a kick in the balls, on 03 May 2017 - 06:38 PM, said:

Sometimes circumstances force people to hand over the baton, it could be a whole host of reasons, family reasons, stress, potential ill health.......

Yes it could....but just disappearing does make people ask questions....

[Wooden Spoon]

Only Me! said:

1493837323[/url]' post='1300859']
Yes it could....but just disappearing does make people ask questions....

The answers to your questions are in this thread.