[dim view]

freelander2, on 08 September 2016 - 07:18 PM, said:

Was the Merc considered surplus to requirements too?

I love the flash, no cash brigade!

They don't seem very lucky in their dealings with vehicle supply companies. I'm told there were some fun and games with the Autoworld sponsorship renewal.

[Stoptalkingbol]

Better tone it down a little as you rascals are upsetting poor old Les Dennis.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

freelander2, on 08 September 2016 - 07:18 PM, said:

Was the Merc considered surplus to requirements too?

I love the flash, no cash brigade!

So am I to believe someone overseeing an enterprise nearly eighty thousand in debt and leaving parents, staff and creditors unpaid was driving around in a Merc?

[Tha Knows...]

If its flash no cash it's an old merc

[Guest_freelander2_*]

Zorro, on 06 September 2016 - 12:39 PM, said:

No azul, this has no bearing on the hold up.

What does my head in over this was why it wasn't picked up by the club, why didn't somebody at the PPP point this out to the club and why didn't somebody on here at least point it out to the club or at least a director for investigation rather than it going the full distance.

Z

Just an update on this.

First of all the CCJ that was awarded against CFC 2001 Ltd for £6,327.00 on 27/07/16, this is showing as paid, on 02/09/16. However, mindful of AC's comments about the judgment being made in error and against the wrong company (debt said to relate to CFCFDS), the CCJ still shows on the credit file, I am therefore assuming that AC has been unsuccessful is requesting that the court set aside the judgment and in doing so, have it removed from the register?

Second point, the CCJ that was awarded against CFC Football Development School Ltd for £4,334.00 on 23/08/16. Given that the DT published their story on 06/09/16 and one assumes that Graham approached the club prior to this to confirm their position, I am surprised to see that this CCJ is still showing as unpaid, some 35 days after judgment was made. So as for things going the full distance, they only have themselves to blame on this one.

What is odd considering that AC has said that both debts relate to CFCFDS, is that the CCJ issued against the club was settled promptly after it was brought to the club's attention, yet the one issued against CFCFDS remains unpaid.

This post has been edited by freelander2: 27 September 2016 - 02:53 PM

[dim view]

freelander2, on 27 September 2016 - 02:52 PM, said:

Just an update on this.

First of all the CCJ that was awarded against CFC 2001 Ltd for £6,327.00 on 27/07/16, this is showing as paid, on 02/09/16. However, mindful of AC's comments about the judgment being made in error and against the wrong company (debt said to relate to CFCFDS), the CCJ still shows on the credit file, I am therefore assuming that AC has been unsuccessful is requesting that the court set aside the judgment and in doing so, have it removed from the register?

Second point, the CCJ that was awarded against CFC Football Development School Ltd for £4,334.00 on 23/08/16. Given that the DT published their story on 06/09/16 and one assumes that Graham approached the club prior to this to confirm their position, I am surprised to see that this CCJ is still showing as unpaid, some 35 days after judgment was made. So as for things going the full distance, they only have themselves to blame on this one.

What is odd considering that AC has said that both debts relate to CFCFDS, is that the CCJ issued against the club was settled promptly after it was brought to the club's attention, yet the one issued against CFCFDS remains unpaid.

Isn't CFCFDS now defunct?
My reading of events is that only the International School now exists. I find it hard to follow.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

freelander2, on 27 September 2016 - 02:52 PM, said:

Just an update on this.

First of all the CCJ that was awarded against CFC 2001 Ltd for £6,327.00 on 27/07/16, this is showing as paid, on 02/09/16. However, mindful of AC's comments about the judgment being made in error and against the wrong company (debt said to relate to CFCFDS), the CCJ still shows on the credit file, I am therefore assuming that AC has been unsuccessful is requesting that the court set aside the judgment and in doing so, have it removed from the register?

Second point, the CCJ that was awarded against CFC Football Development School Ltd for £4,334.00 on 23/08/16. Given that the DT published their story on 06/09/16 and one assumes that Graham approached the club prior to this to confirm their position, I am surprised to see that this CCJ is still showing as unpaid, some 35 days after judgment was made. So as for things going the full distance, they only have themselves to blame on this one.

What is odd considering that AC has said that both debts relate to CFCFDS, is that the CCJ issued against the club was settled promptly after it was brought to the club's attention, yet the one issued against CFCFDS remains unpaid.

So if the Club's version of events is accurate...

..why would a court not remove the CCJ against CFC?

Did that court decide it really is in the Club's name?

Was it even challenged at all?

Exactly who's responsible for the CFC CCJ?

Who paid it?

Why would the DS pay only one of two CCJs if they're both it's responsibility?

Infact why would they pay the one in CFC's name and not their own?

What happened to assurances everyone had been paid?

Why weren't these issues addressed prior the recent announcement?

All assuming the Club's version of events is accurate, of course...

[Spireite-Karl]

MDCCCLXVI, on 27 September 2016 - 05:36 PM, said:

So if the Club's version of events is accurate...

..why would a court not remove the CCJ against CFC?

Did that court decide it really is in the Club's name?

Was it even challenged at all?

Exactly who's responsible for the CFC CCJ?

Who paid it?

Why would the DS pay only one of two CCJs if they're both it's responsibility?

Infact why would they pay the one in CFC's name and not their own?

What happened to assurances everyone had been paid?

Why weren't these issues addressed prior the recent announcement?

All assuming the Club's version of events is accurate, of course...

Some very good questions there Chris to be asked when we have this meeting with CT and AC

[Guest_freelander2_*]

A further CCJ issued against the club on 31/03/17 for £1,962.00. Details here:

https://t.co/3Q1xZ2aS9s

[Sammy Spireite]

freelander2, on 10 April 2017 - 03:18 PM, said:

A further CCJ issued against the club on 31/03/17 for £1,962.00. Details here:

https://t.co/3Q1xZ2aS9s

Can we assume that Blacks have provided proof of the ownership of the debt then?

Surely this hasn't come out of the blue, though?

For a CCJ to be issued, doesn't the claimant have to provide some sort of "proof of prior chase" for the debt?

[Looker-on]

I take my hat off to the lot of them. There can't be that many clubs who run up a CCJ trying to sort out a CCJ.

[Guest_freelander2_*]

Sammy Spireite, on 10 April 2017 - 03:56 PM, said:

For a CCJ to be issued, doesn't the claimant have to provide some sort of "proof of prior chase" for the debt?

The original post (http://www.thecfss.c...dpost&p=1240311) should answer your questions.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Is Ashley Carson for real?

Of course this is a disgrace - but it's just another drop in an entire ocean of disgraces.

And let's remember that 'Bob's Board' members were narrating and exposing them as long ago as February 2016.

Yet AC talks as if this is a surprise, a shock, almost denying his key position at the Club and relationship with those responsible.

Well the CCJ happened on his watch, under his nose, as he was supposedly dealing with the disaster over the road.

I'm also puzzled how the money to pay it 'won't come from the Club'; so from where will it come - Sutcliffe? 'FBT'? Turner? It's not even clear who's paying the liquidator as CFCFDS has no assets to call upon - so who'll end up footing the bill?

I'm sorry Ashley but I refuse to buy this hands-in-the-air, 'nowt to do with me, Guv' kinda posturing.

Too many people have been allowed too much licence for far too long, possibly costing CFC - in other words honest supporters - an incalculable amount of money.

Well my ST wedge won't be part of it next season, just as it won't be used to pay-off Caldwell, Branston, the former Assay Office employee who's now our kit man or any other costly cock-up's that'll no doubt emerge.

This post has been edited by MDCCCLXVI: 10 April 2017 - 04:11 PM

[dim view]

MDCCCLXVI, on 10 April 2017 - 04:01 PM, said:

Is Ashley Carson for real?

Of course this is a disgrace - but it's just another drop in an entire ocean of disgraces.

And let's remember that 'Bob's Board' members were narrating and exposing them as long ago as February 2016.

Yet AC talks as if this is a surprise, a shock, almost denying his key position at the Club and relationship with those responsible.

Well the CCJ happened on his watch, under his nose, as he was supposedly dealing with the disaster over the road.

Ashley has asked Blacks to do some work for CFC and then forgotten to pay the bill. It's easily done. I bet Blacks forgot to remind him promptly. The poor thing needs a break. Will Shorts be next?

[Guest_freelander2_*]

MDCCCLXVI, on 10 April 2017 - 04:01 PM, said:

I'm also puzzled how the money to pay it 'won't come from the Club'; so from where will it come - Sutcliffe? 'FBT'? Turner? It's not even clear who's paying the liquidator as CFCFDS has no assets to call upon - so who'll end up footing the bill?

People are sweating and in the process they are dropping some right clangers.

Did you know that Sutcliffe had given a personal guarantee covering Barclay's overdraft facility, total liability is £13,600.67. Who the flip is paying that?

This post has been edited by freelander2: 10 April 2017 - 05:59 PM

[Benno Spire]

The heat is being turned up in the frying pan. Who will be the first to jump out into the fire!!

[azul]

Benno Spire, on 10 April 2017 - 06:04 PM, said:

The heat is being turned up in the frying pan. Who will be the first to jump out into the fire!!

There's only Ashley left frying

[Stockholm Spireite]

Benno Spire, on 10 April 2017 - 06:04 PM, said:

The heat is being turned up in the frying pan. Who will be the first to jump out into the fire!!

azul, on 10 April 2017 - 06:09 PM, said:

There's only Ashley left frying

I'm surprised AC needs to go to Malta, Dubai or Thailand when it's getting so damn hot in his own back yard...

[azul]

Stockholm Spireite, on 10 April 2017 - 06:14 PM, said:

I'm surprised AC needs to go to Malta, Dubai or Thailand when it's getting so damn hot in his own back yard...

Does an Assay Master have the same powers as a Jedi Master?

If not, he'll be back to his old job......

http://www.thestar.c...-cars-1-6653233

[whittman]

azul, on 10 April 2017 - 06:09 PM, said:

There's only Ashley left frying

And I think he knows it