[dtp]

freelander2, on 18 March 2017 - 01:59 PM, said:

Just a few observations:

1) What do you think has changed concerning AC's role at the club?

2) Out of the former directors at SWFC, why was AC the only one selected to join Dave Allen at CFC?

3) See page 15, paragraph 6 of this document, https://www.scribd.c...-Chapter-Closes, it reads as follows:

Bob had been supportive in the early part of the year and had turned into what we thought was just a miserable sod from spring on wards. His real agenda would unfold after that years AGM and after I had had my surgery. Bob had regularly let Nick down by being destructive in board meetings despite discussing matters at length with Nick in advance of the board meetings and he had finally confirmed that part of his agenda revolved around a long standing commitment made to Mick Wright about returning him to the board as chairman after they had gotten rid of Dave Allen and Kaven Walker (hello Dave – that’s your friends real position dude).

To be clear, Kaven Walker was SWFC's former CEO. I wonder what Lee Strafford means by, "hello Dave – that’s your friends real position dude"? Who do you think Strafford was referring to?

Rightly, or wrongly, I believe AC has taken on more of the day to day running of the club since CT was sidetracked and ultimately disposed of. I understand he might still be DA's puppet but in view of the fact that DA is the owner it is difficult to see who might not be in that role.

[dtp]

Mrhappy, on 18 March 2017 - 03:36 PM, said:

Mmmm not sure about that, I bought some ronseal stain to do the decking this week.........patchy as fûck, ended up doin it with Cuprinol.

It would turn out patchy though - it's peed it down all weekend!!!!!!

[dtp]

Les Ashmore, on 18 March 2017 - 03:32 PM, said:

Oh I am sure that eventually someone may or may not eventually make any evidence public I am also sure that it may or may not create Havoc when and if it does

Just for the sake of argument, one way or the other, whether whatever it is or isn't totally correct or just made it up I'd like to say I might fully agree or disagree with you Les.

[Mrhappy]

dtp, on 18 March 2017 - 08:23 PM, said:

It would turn out patchy though - it's peed it down all weekend!!!!!!

No, I did it in the week......in essence it didn't do exactly what it said on the tin.

[dtp]

Mrhappy, on 18 March 2017 - 08:43 PM, said:

No, I did it in the week......in essence it didn't do exactly what it said on the tin.

No problem mate - it didn't do what it says on the tin.

Forgetting everything else which ain't working at CFC I still feel that a manager should be able to get a win rate of more than 1 out of 12 and try to entertain the fans. In the very first place the main thing the average fan wants is to have a bit of pride in what he sees on the grass. GC has failed in every respect regarding this, there has been no new manager bounce like at Oldham, Shrewsbury, Bury etc just nothingness - he hasn't done what I thought it says on the tin.

Just think, his eventual "pay-off" plus the resulting lost revenue following his appointment might be far more expensive than any compensation we might have had to pay for a manager currently in a job.

This post has been edited by dtp: 18 March 2017 - 09:30 PM

[Mr Mercury]

itsc, on 18 March 2017 - 07:50 AM, said:

It seems that your right in that no one believe what I say

So I'm afraid I will delete my account and leave you all to decide on 3 months time if I did a job or not

Good luck all

It's all too familiar to ACs posts on here, when the viewpoints and subsequent questions get too near the knuckle and too difficult to answer they play the victim card and dissapear rather than stay and prove their point and show the posters to be wrong. Which of course the posters rarely are.

[Mrhappy]

Mr Mercury, on 18 March 2017 - 09:30 PM, said:

It's all too familiar to ACs posts on here, when the viewpoints and subsequent questions get too near the knuckle and too difficult to answer they play the victim card and dissapear rather than stay and prove their point and show the posters to be wrong. Which of course the posters rarely are.

I'd say that's about right!

[Spireiteboy155]

dim view, on 17 March 2017 - 04:38 PM, said:

A proposal to appoint Andy Morris to any position at CFC would not survive a vote by a show of hands at a Board meeting. Not that this would concern Ashley greatly.
As I said a couple of weeks ago, these matters must worry JC and MW immensely. They should consider their positions very carefully and be prepared to leave Carson to himself in his murky world.

Bruno is a great guy but when it comes to organisation etc, well let's say if he took a group to a brewery, everyone would end up sober!