[Mr Mercury]

60s 70s Spireite, on 16 February 2017 - 12:41 PM, said:

Stinks.

Even at this stage you have to shake your head at the way it's carrying on.

[Guest_freelander2_*]

Mr Mercury, on 16 February 2017 - 01:18 PM, said:

Even at this stage you have to shake your head at the way it's carrying on.

I believe there are already two creditors who are willing to appoint fans / former members of staff as proxy voters.

Also given the suggestion that HMRC are said to be in this for £50K+, I would imagine they will also have a representative at the meeting.

The possibilities are endless.

This post has been edited by freelander2: 16 February 2017 - 01:48 PM

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

acarson, on 15 February 2017 - 10:38 PM, said:

There will be a Fans forum relating to CFC by invitation.

Why invitation, Ashley?

Who's deciding the list of invitees?

Weren't all previous meeting attended by a delegation of fans?

And where does this leave talk of openness and transparency?

[Mrhappy]

MDCCCLXVI, on 16 February 2017 - 03:35 PM, said:

Why invitation, Ashley?

Who's deciding the list of invitees?

Weren't all previous meeting attended by a delegation of fans?

And where does this leave talk of openness and transparency?

Ashley, you are in great danger of further antagonising the fan base............just be open for goodness sake.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

dim view, on 16 February 2017 - 08:40 AM, said:

....and Why has CFCFDS failed, Mr Liquidator?

The Liquidator 'should investigate the causes of the company's failure and the conduct of its managers, in the wider public interest of action being taken against those engaged in commercially culpable conduct'

How can he possibly do that before the 1st March? Ashley, on the other hand, wants it to be a simple rubber stamping watershed arrangement with a Liquidator he is paying for.

I have a feeling creditors will be more clued up than Big L by the time the meeting starts.

Is this true?

What, Carson personally or using CFC funds?

Shouldn't Turner and Sutcliffe be liable?

Or 'FBT'?

And doesn't such a scenario offer the suggestion it'll be a rushed, perhaps lightly investigated liquidation?

From what I'm reading here Turner, Sutcliffe and anyone else involved should, by law, be held to account for their enterprise failing so badly by a liquidator appointed to represent creditors.

[Mrhappy]

MDCCCLXVI, on 16 February 2017 - 03:46 PM, said:

Is this true?

What, Carson personally or using CFC funds?

Shouldn't Turner and Sutcliffe be liable?

Or 'FBT'?

And doesn't such a scenario offer the suggestion it'll be a rushed, perhaps lightly investigated liquidation?

From what I'm reading here Turner, Sutcliffe and anyone else involved should, by law, be held to account for their enterprise failing so badly by a liquidator appointed to represent creditors.

I think it's time for independent legal people and possible law enforcement to start getting involved.........of course if the house is in order then that should be welcome by all at CFC.

[Guest_freelander2_*]

It would appear that Sutcliffe is also popular with the FA, a 6 point deduction issued today for fielding unregistered players. I suppose AC & CT didn't know that was going on either!


screengrab

This post has been edited by freelander2: 16 February 2017 - 05:15 PM

[Johnnyspireite7]

freelander2, on 16 February 2017 - 04:43 PM, said:

It would appear that Sutcliffe is also popular with the FA, a 6 point deduction issued today for fielding unregistered players. I suppose AC & CT didn't know that was going on either!


screengrab

Small point but isn't the Chesterfield U21's Mark Smith's remit and nothing to do with the fiasco across the road?

[Guest_freelander2_*]

Johnnyspireite7, on 16 February 2017 - 06:12 PM, said:

Small point but isn't the Chesterfield U21's Mark Smith's remit and nothing to do with the fiasco across the road?

Nothing whatsoever to do with MS, however it's an easy assumption to make.

[DIFH]

Mrhappy, on 16 February 2017 - 03:49 PM, said:

I think it's time for independent legal people and possible law enforcement to start getting involved.........of course if the house is in order then that should be welcome by all at CFC.

There''s the chance that CT and or AC could end up being disqualified as being future directors in any business if this goes the wrong way for them.

[Mr Mercury]

Dave In Footie Heaven, on 16 February 2017 - 08:16 PM, said:

There''s the chance that CT and or AC could end up being disqualified as being future directors in any business if this goes the wrong way for them.

Hence the move to DoF, pathetic!

[DIFH]

Mr Mercury, on 16 February 2017 - 08:37 PM, said:

Hence the move to DoF, pathetic!

That won't stop any disqualification.

[Mr Mercury]

Dave In Footie Heaven, on 16 February 2017 - 09:04 PM, said:

That won't stop any disqualification.

No but it gives him a job he can still do.

[Mr_Pleasant]

freelander2, on 16 February 2017 - 01:47 PM, said:

I believe there are already two creditors who are willing to appoint fans / former members of staff as proxy voters.

Also given the suggestion that HMRC are said to be in this for £50K+, I would imagine they will also have a representative at the meeting.

The possibilities are endless.

If HMRC is a creditor, that could be interesting. It used to be that HMRC debts were preferential but not any more. HMRC can be pretty aggressive. May not give the liquidator an easy ride.

[The Earl of Chesterfield]

Mr Mercury, on 16 February 2017 - 09:16 PM, said:

No but it gives him a job he can still do.

It's my strong opinion that if the liquidator thoroughly pursues it's role there'll be no job he can still do.

[Mr Mercury]

MDCCCLXVI, on 16 February 2017 - 09:25 PM, said:

It's my strong opinion that if the liquidator thoroughly pursues it's role there'll be no job he can still do.

On a side note do the Royal Mail still subcontract certain jobs?

[moondog]

It appears Sutcliffe is out of the equation going by this FBT tweet yesterday


"We are in the process of recruiting people who are able to recruit players to our academy from around the world"

https://mobile.twitt...ve?q=AcademyFBT

[spireitenag]

moondog, on 16 February 2017 - 10:30 PM, said:

It appears Sutcliffe is out of the equation going by this FBT tweet yesterday


"We are in the process of recruiting people who are able to recruit players to our academy from around the world"

https://mobile.twitt...ve?q=AcademyFBT

Cue the phone call from Denis Bingham.

[Mrhappy]

moondog, on 16 February 2017 - 10:30 PM, said:

It appears Sutcliffe is out of the equation going by this FBT tweet yesterday


"We are in the process of recruiting people who are able to recruit players to our academy from around the world"

https://mobile.twitt...ve?q=AcademyFBT

More like out of sight.

[Mrhappy]

freelander2, on 12 February 2017 - 10:30 AM, said:

Have you made contact with Mike Hegarty?

Update: Still awaiting reply from Mike Hegarty of FBT, to my e mail asking for clarification of Liam Sutcliffe's situation.