Sammy Spireite, on 10 November 2016 - 11:46 PM, said:
Fully agree.
When I raised the issue of existing sponsors feeling unwanted, peed off and total alienated from the club currently, it seemed to strike a chord and hopefully will trigger change.
As I said last night, The 2 JJ's are what's keeping a lot of current sponsors, sponsors that have been with the club many many years, still putting their money in.
At last we are getting someone who is speaking the truth, I thought a hell of a lot of good points were brought up Wednesday and points that needed an answer.
But the part that has pee'd me off is with all the respect that Nick Johnson has by all parties, The one sided version of events has been posted even though it was agreed that he would transcribe the recorded meeting and put the transcript to all groups / parties concerned for agreement before it was made part of a discussion.
I think everybody was in agreement that this type of forum is badly needed at CFC, I think it's future may be in jeopardy by this pre posting.
A lot of the version is fair but it is very obviously biased