Fans Forum 9 November
#81
Posted 06 November 2016 - 09:44 PM
Might need a bigger venue than the Proact somewhere like the winding wheel
#82
Posted 06 November 2016 - 09:54 PM
jonnythespireite, on 06 November 2016 - 09:33 PM, said:
Questions should be posed at the AGM.
The problem is the 'reaching out' from Allen's puppet makes certain posters on here feel all warm and cuddly and 'included'...
It doesn't make me feel all warm and included. I've stated on here enough times that I think CT has been a disaster as CEO. I feel that if I say this from behind a keyboard then, when given the opportunity, I should at least have the decency to say it in the open, so to speak.
#83
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:11 PM
Mr Mercury, on 06 November 2016 - 09:54 PM, said:
How was the selection for the Bobs Board members arrived upon Mr M
#84
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:17 PM
Mr Mercury, on 06 November 2016 - 09:54 PM, said:
This thread is taking a predictable course.
Assumng you are a shareholder and the CFC board still have enough courage to hold open questions after the AGM's formal business, you'll still have the opportunity to put your concerns forward. I suspect after this meeting on the 9th there will be more questions than answers.
You might even be able to tabke your question directly to Turner and be allowed a comeback after his response. I wouldn't count on it though
#85
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:24 PM
The Peoples Champion, on 06 November 2016 - 10:11 PM, said:
I think moondog touched upon this in the initial post on this thread, other than that I don't know.
#86
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:24 PM
#87
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:34 PM
1. how many questions in total are there?
2. how do the non invited get questions on the agenda?
3. questions that require research??? surely a matter of opinion so questioners you could be clever here.
4. (and this is me being silly) is the lack of pie and peas at this new event a sign of how desperate the finances are. If p&p has been reinstated I apologies for my cynicism.
seriously though I do have questions i'd like answers to, can I forward these to someone for consideration?
#88
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:37 PM
jack bauer, on 06 November 2016 - 10:34 PM, said:
1. how many questions in total are there?
2. how do the non invited get questions on the agenda?
3. questions that require research??? surely a matter of opinion so questioners you could be clever here.
4. (and this is me being silly) is the lack of pie and peas at this new event a sign of how desperate the finances are. If p&p has been reinstated I apologies for my cynicism.
seriously though I do have questions i'd like answers to, can I forward these to someone for consideration?
You can forward them to me either via pm or to : [email protected]
#89
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:38 PM

#91
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:43 PM
#92
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:45 PM
jonnythespireite, on 06 November 2016 - 09:33 PM, said:
Questions should be posed at the AGM.
The problem is the 'reaching out' from Allen's puppet makes certain posters on here feel all warm and cuddly and 'included'...
Just to add jonnythespireite, a lot of those invited, and I don't include me, are the ones who've highlighted the issues that many of us are concerned about. If they intended to be the chosen few and be all warm and cuddly then they certainly wouldn't have done the questioning and probing they've done!
#93
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:46 PM
Westbars Spireite, on 06 November 2016 - 10:43 PM, said:
But if it's the club wanting to apologise and be more open, it's got to come from them surely? You call a meeting, you minute and publish.

#94
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:46 PM
#95
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:50 PM
Heart of a Niven, on 06 November 2016 - 10:46 PM, said:
Do you really think we're all that gullible and naïve ?
Time for a reality check my friend.
Make no mistake some of the info we've got that will form part of our questioning could put ourselves in a very difficult position.
#96
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:54 PM

#97
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:56 PM
Heart of a Niven, on 06 November 2016 - 10:46 PM, said:
Sorry but that's far from the case. I've posted many times of my distrust and dislike of what has happened under Turners watch, I've now been given a chance to come from behind the keyboard and try to question that. I'm hastily thinking "have I posted anything that makes me liable" but I'm prepared to show my face. If you think you might offer more to the meeting than I can then as far as I'm concerned you can have my place.
#98
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:57 PM
Heart of a Niven, on 06 November 2016 - 10:46 PM, said:
I've not changed one iota mate and can assure you there are no lap dogs amongst the group co-opted to attend this meeting. I also don't see a single posturing post over being chosen, if I've missed it provide the post number.
Incidentally how would you have handled being asked to put a limited group together?
#99
Posted 06 November 2016 - 10:58 PM
Heart of a Niven, on 06 November 2016 - 10:46 PM, said:
"Looking at them" could have a downside, these individuals may be putting their heads (and real names) above the parapet to get shot at. There is always a threat of legal action lurking in the background. If they didn't have the club at heart, they wouldn't be doing it, as there is nothing in it for them personally.
Let's see what questions are asked, evidence put forward and answers given before we shoot anyone down.
#100
Posted 06 November 2016 - 11:00 PM
Just look Carson and Turner in the eye and ask them if they knew prior about Rafflegate. And if they didn't, why didn't they?
