Gboly Offer
#63
Posted 22 August 2016 - 10:12 AM
Spire-Power, on 22 August 2016 - 10:03 AM, said:
it would suggest that incentivising such deals works?
However, whether you could argue if such deals are always for the good of the squad/team in another matter.
The Gimp, on 22 August 2016 - 10:00 AM, said:
indeed, it would appear so.
#64
Posted 22 August 2016 - 10:32 AM
musclelove, on 22 August 2016 - 08:10 AM, said:
Unfortunately that isn't the real problem, just one of the symptoms. Even if the CEO has no bonus from selling players the problems at the club would persist. The issue is people in positions who are totally unsuited to them.
Above Freelander cites the last promotion season and the financial results. As he says the club lost over £1,000,000. However, no one appeared to be doing anything to address this, in fact CFC signed a Dan Gardner in January which would have increased the net spend. This leaves 2 possibilities - either they budgeted for a large loss or were unaware the club was losing £20,000 a week. The actions and reactions since those figures came out strongly suggest it was not a loss that was budgeted for.
This leaves us looking at the uncomfortable fact that the man charged with running the club had no idea what was being spent where, and no idea of what income was being generated where and when. This man is still in position, with the same responsibilities.
#65
Posted 22 August 2016 - 10:44 AM
#66
Posted 22 August 2016 - 10:50 AM
Sammy Spireite, on 22 August 2016 - 09:53 AM, said:
Except the Eoin Doyle transfer - we held all the cards & should have sold him in the summer!
Spire-Power, on 22 August 2016 - 10:44 AM, said:
Well IF they sell for these figures...someone wants their head looking at
#68
Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:02 AM
Spire-Power, on 22 August 2016 - 10:44 AM, said:
I doubt they'd jump that much
if the £150k first bid is accurate, then id expect the third to be not more than £250k
Spire-Power, on 22 August 2016 - 10:59 AM, said:
No guarantee of course that
Spire-Power, on 22 August 2016 - 10:44 AM, said:
selling/keeping Gboly wont determine whether we are relegated or not.
#69
Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:06 AM
Nitrous Oxide, on 22 August 2016 - 06:25 AM, said:
It's brinkmanship guys - the club have an acceptable figure in their minds eye. It's now or never because of Bolys contract situation. We are making noises to placate the fanbase. Barnsley will be trying to come across as low key interested.
IT'S A GAME BUT FOR US A VERY SERIOUS POINT IN TIME.
#70
Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:06 AM
Sammy Spireite, on 22 August 2016 - 11:02 AM, said:
It's SO reassuring that we will get closer to our valuation than not

#71
Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:17 AM
Sammy Spireite, on 22 August 2016 - 11:02 AM, said:
if the £150k first bid is accurate, then id expect the third to be not more than £250k
No guarantee of course that
selling/keeping Gboly wont determine whether we are relegated or not.- maybe not but things will be a whole lot worse off.
#72
Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:19 AM
The Gimp, on 22 August 2016 - 10:32 AM, said:
Above Freelander cites the last promotion season and the financial results. As he says the club lost over £1,000,000. However, no one appeared to be doing anything to address this, in fact CFC signed a Dan Gardner in January which would have increased the net spend. This leaves 2 possibilities - either they budgeted for a large loss or were unaware the club was losing £20,000 a week. The actions and reactions since those figures came out strongly suggest it was not a loss that was budgeted for.
This leaves us looking at the uncomfortable fact that the man charged with running the club had no idea what was being spent where, and no idea of what income was being generated where and when. This man is still in position, with the same responsibilities.
Agreed,the man is clearly not up to the job,any other owner would have fired him by now,something is clearly amiss at the Proact at boardroom level.
Can't wait for our owner to start moaning about lack of people at home games,you reap what you sow DA.
#73
Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:19 AM
DMU Blue, on 22 August 2016 - 07:10 AM, said:
Why would we not put a price tag on him?
Because if we put a £3m price tag on him and only accept £750k then he might aswell be slung on a pasting table outside the ground on a Sunday morning with a sign that says "any offers accepted". Infact we might aswell chuck SEB onto that same table with a sign that says BOGOF.
#74
Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:34 AM
#75
Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:37 AM
Sammy Spireite, on 22 August 2016 - 11:02 AM, said:
if the £150k first bid is accurate, then id expect the third to be not more than £250k
We're guessing remember
No guarantee of course that
Not sure of your point there
selling/keeping Gboly wont determine whether we are relegated or not.
It might play a significant part though, especially if Ched leaves.
#76
Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:38 AM
My only hope is that DA and AC see this player as a more valuable asset and will hang on for a bigger fee as they have previously stated how much they think of him
#77
Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:46 AM
Benno Spire, on 22 August 2016 - 11:38 AM, said:
My only hope is that DA and AC see this player as a more valuable asset and will hang on for a bigger fee as they have previously stated how much they think of him
If the top offer is £500k and he continues to improve, would he be worth less than that in January?
I share your concern as our first team has no depth and needs strengthening as it is.
#78
Posted 22 August 2016 - 11:58 AM
Benno Spire, on 22 August 2016 - 11:38 AM, said:
My only hope is that DA and AC see this player as a more valuable asset and will hang on for a bigger fee as they have previously stated how much they think of him
The asset's value is limited for a number of reasons.
He looks good in our league at times, in the grand sceme of things he's still a big gamble for the buyer - that will be reflected on any offers made.
#79
Posted 22 August 2016 - 12:13 PM
Dave In Footie Heaven, on 22 August 2016 - 11:58 AM, said:
He looks good in our league at times, in the grand sceme of things he's still a big gamble for the buyer - that will be reflected on any offers made.
I agree, if he performed consistently week in week out his value would be considerably higher. Possibly at a higher level player may stand off which may suit his game. Possibly he will only make the bench for a championship squad and be an impact player until he earns his place.
#80
Posted 22 August 2016 - 12:20 PM
Benno Spire, on 22 August 2016 - 12:13 PM, said:
The point is - he is starting to perform consistently week in week out.