Derbyshire Times Latest
#1301
Posted 01 August 2016 - 09:17 AM
http://www.derbyshir...roact-1-8043701
#1303
Posted 02 August 2016 - 03:36 PM
DT ban on player interviews lifted?
#1309
Posted 03 August 2016 - 02:00 PM
RGS, on 03 August 2016 - 01:34 PM, said:
Hi Graham.
Drawing a line under what they called your disruptive actions (what a joke) is all very matey, but it's not good enough for supporters.
How much did CT know about Rafflegate? How is he still employed? How do you report whatever will happen next? There can't be a line drawn.
#1310
Posted 03 August 2016 - 02:44 PM
dim view, on 03 August 2016 - 02:00 PM, said:
Drawing a line under what they called your disruptive actions (what a joke) is all very matey, but it's not good enough for supporters.
How much did CT know about Rafflegate? How is he still employed? How do you report whatever will happen next? There can't be a line drawn.
To be fair I think the Managing Director of the DT has made it clear, they remain committed to reporting on all aspects of the club, the "line drawn" comment came from the club
#1311
Posted 03 August 2016 - 02:57 PM
moondog, on 03 August 2016 - 02:44 PM, said:
I've said before and I will say it again,I don't trust any of the Sheffield three as far as I could throw them,just my opinion and feel free to rip me to bits anyone but that's how I feel.
#1312
Posted 03 August 2016 - 03:01 PM
moondog, on 03 August 2016 - 02:44 PM, said:
They may say its but hard to believe the DT will be anywhere near as keen to publish anything controversial issues that may rock the boat. Whilst the board were anti DT, issues could be exposed... I'm not so sure they will act with the same vigour now.

#1313
Posted 03 August 2016 - 03:11 PM
marlons curtains, on 03 August 2016 - 03:01 PM, said:
I'm not so sure. Do the club think they came out of it well banning them or did it draw more attention to certain matters?
Presumably it was the PPP issues and Turner in particular that the 'club' took most issue with.
This post has been edited by Westbars Spireite: 03 August 2016 - 03:15 PM
#1314
Posted 03 August 2016 - 03:15 PM
#1315
Posted 03 August 2016 - 03:27 PM
freelander2, on 03 August 2016 - 03:15 PM, said:
at least based on recent experience we wont have long to wait to find out then.....
They need board level changes to put some professionalism and independence into decisions. Sure a couple of us off here could volunteer to help with that, if someone just had the backbone to authorise it. Volunteer = for free, just in case they missed that bit. I'm happy with 3% on my savings at Santander.....
#1316
Posted 03 August 2016 - 03:29 PM
isleaiw1, on 03 August 2016 - 03:27 PM, said:
They need board level changes to put some professionalism and independence into decisions. Sure a couple of us off here could volunteer to help with that, if someone just had the backbone to authorise it. Volunteer = for free, just in case they missed that bit. I'm happy with 3% on my savings at Santander.....
2% soon.
http://www.thisismon...nt-account.html
#1319
Posted 03 August 2016 - 05:53 PM
isleaiw1, on 03 August 2016 - 03:27 PM, said:
They need board level changes to put some professionalism and independence into decisions. Sure a couple of us off here could volunteer to help with that, if someone just had the backbone to authorise it. Volunteer = for free, just in case they missed that bit. I'm happy with 3% on my savings at Santander.....
My view is quite simple, we have a multi-millionaire owner who is clearly happy with the status quo. If he wanted to instill a greater level of professionalism into the club, he has the funds to do so.
#1320
Posted 03 August 2016 - 06:54 PM
RGS, on 03 August 2016 - 04:20 PM, said:
not sure the point about playing an XI is wholly true. We have played similar sides in the past, such as an Aston Villa XI, to better crowds. For some, disenchantment with the powers that be was a reason for non attendance last night, yet no mention. Is this the start?
