moondog, on 20 June 2016 - 05:27 PM, said:
The defence team would do no such thing knowing his situation four years on is irrelevant. In fact he's probably reduced his compensation for being wrongly convicted by obtaining employment with us
Do you mean compensation as in £ awarded as a result of the original conviction being quashed? I dont think Evans or his brief would see that as a priority, let alone present it as part of a case. If he can be presented in any kind of favourable light, as someone with a career to return to than as a pariah mistrusted throughout the game, then he will be. I can understand the value of this to his case; I'd rather my club weren't providing it. It seems naive at best. At worst it looks like an endorsement of a man about to go to trial for a very serious assault.