Derbyshire Times Latest
#301
Posted 22 April 2016 - 09:45 AM
#302
Posted 22 April 2016 - 10:43 AM
dim view said:
Ok, here's a reader's comments that could be followed up.
Barrie Hubbard said at a fairly recent AGM that the youth set up cost net about £30k a year. Several years ago we sold a 14 year old to Everton for a fortune. We also made hundreds of thousands from the sale of 2 youth products, Darikwa and Bowery.
The DT should ask how the net £1m expenditure figure over 10 years was derived.
The DT should ask how PPP intends to reduce the costs of the youth set up.
The DT should ask the spokesman whether he made a mistake saying that LS had never been paid by CFC.
The DT should ask CFC for permission to ask Shorts whether PPP is or has been a creditor and let us know what their response is.
They should also ask how trips cancelled in this financial year are responsible for losses in the previous financial year.
Mr Mercury, your point about CT disappearing into the background is an interesting one. But don't worry, his incompetence won't leave him in the shadows for long. The next thing he is involved in will be the next gaff and embarrassing episode for the club.
#303
Posted 22 April 2016 - 03:27 PM
Or as the more cynical might put it, summoned to the Proact so Turner & Co could try to intimidate him into silence.
I'm also informed the Club's Head of Media and Communications instigated this meeting: why? What has an issue involving the DC/PPP - which is supposedly separate from CFC - to do with him? And did Turner and Sutcliffe pay for use of CFC facilities to host this little get together?
I'd suggest that instead of these cack-handed attempts to brush their embarrassment under an already mountainous carpet Turner and Sutcliffe - or whoever's speaking on their behalf - stop contradicting reality and tell the truth.
This post has been edited by MDCCCLXVI: 22 April 2016 - 03:37 PM
#304
Posted 22 April 2016 - 04:02 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 22 April 2016 - 03:27 PM, said:
Or as the more cynical might put it, summoned to the Proact so Turner & Co could try to intimidate him into silence.
I'm also informed the Club's Head of Media and Communications instigated this meeting: why? What has an issue involving the DC/PPP - which is supposedly separate from CFC - to do with him? And did Turner and Sutcliffe pay for use of CFC facilities to host this little get together?
I'd suggest that instead of these cack-handed attempts to brush their embarrassment under an already mountainous carpet Turner and Sutcliffe - or whoever's speaking on their behalf - stop contradicting reality and tell the truth.
The below is obviously their Bible
https://www.amazon.c...*=1&*entries*=0
This post has been edited by semi130497: 22 April 2016 - 04:03 PM
#305
Posted 22 April 2016 - 04:38 PM
MDCCCLXVI said:
I'm told our friend 'RGS' was invited to the stadium this morning to discuss recent articles on the DT site.
Or as the more cynical might put it, summoned to the Proact so Turner & Co could try to intimidate him into silence.
I'm also informed the Club's Head of Media and Communications instigated this meeting: why? What has an issue involving the DC/PPP - which is supposedly separate from CFC - to do with him? And did Turner and Sutcliffe pay for use of CFC facilities to host this little get together?
I'd suggest that instead of these cack-handed attempts to brush their embarrassment under an already mountainous carpet Turner and Sutcliffe - or whoever's speaking on their behalf - stop contradicting reality and tell the truth.
The cat is already out of the bag.
Enough people know the DC is, well, as you put it a while ago, a questionable enterprise - it's been in the national media FFS.
Since then there have been developments with bingham, a character who is also questionable, and all that went with it, the editing of websites, videos removed etc.
So the question is "what are they trying to hide, and from who are they trying hide it?"
As I said above, it won't be long before Turners next Gaff hits the front pages.....he's like sheffields version of the duke of Edinburgh.
#306
Posted 22 April 2016 - 04:47 PM
#307
Posted 22 April 2016 - 04:51 PM
There may only be one more home game to avoid facing fans discontentment and that's what I feel they want out of the way so as not to have to give answers.
#308
Posted 22 April 2016 - 06:22 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 22 April 2016 - 03:27 PM, said:
Or as the more cynical might put it, summoned to the Proact so Turner & Co could try to intimidate him into silence.
I'm also informed the Club's Head of Media and Communications instigated this meeting: why? What has an issue involving the DC/PPP - which is supposedly separate from CFC - to do with him? And did Turner and Sutcliffe pay for use of CFC facilities to host this little get together?
I'd suggest that instead of these cack-handed attempts to brush their embarrassment under an already mountainous carpet Turner and Sutcliffe - or whoever's speaking on their behalf - stop contradicting reality and tell the truth.
Thanks for the update.
The article on the DT's website is designed to do one thing and that's to encourage stakeholders to come forward and tell their stories, similar to Joanne Banthorpe's that appeared in the Express. A responsible and switched-on business owner would be asking themselves, what can I do to minimise the risk of people contacting the DT?
The focus should not be on the DT or any other media outlet for that matter, the emphasis should be on ensuring that no one has a story to tell.
#309
Posted 22 April 2016 - 11:25 PM
freelander2, on 22 April 2016 - 06:22 PM, said:
The article on the DT's website is designed to do one thing and that's to encourage stakeholders to come forward and tell their stories, similar to Joanne Banthorpe's that appeared in the Express. A responsible and switched-on business owner would be asking themselves, what can I do to minimise the risk of people contacting the DT?
The focus should not be on the DT or any other media outlet for that matter, the emphasis should be on ensuring that no one has a story to tell.
Exactly instead of trying to stop facts coming out, deal with them !
#311
Posted 23 April 2016 - 08:20 AM
#312
Posted 23 April 2016 - 10:52 AM
Goku said:
We need to move them onto the pitch then
Lol
#313
Posted 23 April 2016 - 11:31 AM
#315
Posted 23 April 2016 - 04:52 PM
freelander2, on 22 April 2016 - 06:22 PM, said:
The article on the DT's website is designed to do one thing and that's to encourage stakeholders to come forward and tell their stories, similar to Joanne Banthorpe's that appeared in the Express. A responsible and switched-on business owner would be asking themselves, what can I do to minimise the risk of people contacting the DT?
The focus should not be on the DT or any other media outlet for that matter, the emphasis should be on ensuring that no one has a story to tell.
Cure the disease, not the symptoms.
#318
Posted 26 April 2016 - 09:37 AM
http://www.derbyshir...eites-1-7875980
#319
Posted 26 April 2016 - 10:07 AM
RGS, on 26 April 2016 - 09:37 AM, said:
http://www.derbyshir...eites-1-7875980
Most important game since Semi Final??
Give over that's nonsense