Development School
#1
Posted 21 April 2016 - 11:04 AM
#2
Posted 21 April 2016 - 11:17 AM
dalekpete, on 21 April 2016 - 11:04 AM, said:
We await the outcome with great interest Pete.
#3
Posted 21 April 2016 - 11:21 AM
dalekpete, on 21 April 2016 - 11:04 AM, said:
Are you going to publish the new developments?
It doesn't seem fair that you know them and we don't.
#4
Posted 21 April 2016 - 12:11 PM
#7
Posted 21 April 2016 - 03:23 PM
Sammy Spireite, on 21 April 2016 - 03:04 PM, said:
The question remains, who is funding the losses? Is it parents and local businesses as creditors, or bona fide funders happy to sit back and wait for a 'return to profit'? Or Directors or the football club?
#8
Posted 21 April 2016 - 03:27 PM
#9
Posted 21 April 2016 - 03:28 PM
60s 70s Spireite, on 21 April 2016 - 03:23 PM, said:
the Football Club claim quite strongly in the DT piece that its not them...
No way will the sum total of parents deposits be anywhere near £77k, either.
#10
Posted 21 April 2016 - 04:15 PM
#11
Posted 21 April 2016 - 04:19 PM
Sammy Spireite, on 21 April 2016 - 03:28 PM, said:
No way will the sum total of parents deposits be anywhere near £77k, either.
Assuming all parents had paid up in full for PSG trip: 35 x £650 = £ 22,750.
#12
Posted 21 April 2016 - 04:24 PM
spireitenag, on 21 April 2016 - 04:19 PM, said:
But again, that's this year's accounts, not the ones discussed in the article.
Just who does Sutcliffe think he's trying to fool?
#13
Posted 21 April 2016 - 08:56 PM
dalekpete, on 21 April 2016 - 11:04 AM, said:
So does this mean someone from the Club's 'had a word' again, Pete?
#14
Posted 21 April 2016 - 09:00 PM
#16
Posted 21 April 2016 - 09:06 PM
#18
Posted 21 April 2016 - 09:56 PM
However the DT has been quite cute, using what's passed between the parties to actually feed the story and exposing statements to the scrutiny of fans.
The thread currently discussing the inaccuracies, contradictions and laughable claims in Bingham, Sutcliffe and the CFC representative's comments pays testament to that.
Nicely played, Derbyshire Times...
#19
Posted 21 April 2016 - 10:00 PM
moondog, on 21 April 2016 - 09:13 PM, said:
So we just call him Turnipe then??
#20
Posted 21 April 2016 - 10:12 PM
MDCCCLXVI, on 21 April 2016 - 09:56 PM, said:
However the DT has been quite cute, using what's passed between the parties to actually feed the story and exposing statements to the scrutiny of fans.
The thread currently discussing the inaccuracies, contradictions and laughable claims in Bingham, Sutcliffe and the CFC representative's comments pays testament to that.
Nicely played, Derbyshire Times...
Agreed worth waiting for