[whittman]

Having seen SEB crossing Sheffield Road from the gym in his training gear imo he is not fat

[Snowflake McBedwetter]

eddymelt, on 09 January 2016 - 06:33 PM, said:

SEB's absolute quality. The reason he might be huffing and puffing is because he has to try and jump a 6"5 defender for 90 minutes when it's hoofed up to him week in week out. I don't think I've ever been as excited when watching Town as seeing a move like his overhead kick which hit the bar, since Jack's first against Rotherham when we thrashed em 5 - 0. Breathtaking

It was like watching a wheelie-bin topple over slowly.

[calvin plummers socks]

whittman, on 09 January 2016 - 06:50 PM, said:

Having seen SEB crossing Sheffield Road from the gym in his training gear imo he is not fat

No he is clearly not fat but he could be (and could always have been)a player of real quality if he put the work in and wasn't so 'lazy')

[eddymelt]

calvin plummers socks, on 09 January 2016 - 06:38 PM, said:

Are you like 12?

I meant since Jack's goal. Not, like, in my whole time watching Town. Like

[azul]

calvin plummers socks, on 09 January 2016 - 06:52 PM, said:

No he is clearly not fat but he could be (and could always have been)a player of real quality if he put the work in and wasn't so 'lazy')

He isn't lazy, he isn't fat and he isn't slow

[danblue]

.......and Nando scores again.......

[azul]

danblue, on 09 January 2016 - 07:07 PM, said:

.......and Nando scores again.......

Should've buried first time

[stokey]

Valley Blues, on 09 January 2016 - 06:45 PM, said:

Is he like 12 what??

12 times cleverer CPS is?

[Ernie Ernie Ernie]

calvin plummers socks, on 09 January 2016 - 06:52 PM, said:

No he is clearly not fat but he could be (and could always have been)a player of real quality if he put the work in and wasn't so 'lazy')

I assume being lazy caused all the bad injuries he's had?

[calvin plummers socks]

stokey, on 09 January 2016 - 07:49 PM, said:

12 times cleverer CPS is?

Who rattled your cage love
(But you're probably right)

This post has been edited by calvin plummers socks: 09 January 2016 - 07:57 PM

[Mr Mercury]

calvin plummers socks, on 09 January 2016 - 06:27 PM, said:

I go to at least 5 games a week (not all Town you understand).

Any chance you could go and bore them on their message boards then?

[calvin plummers socks]

Mr Mercury, on 09 January 2016 - 07:54 PM, said:

Any chance you could go and bore them on their message boards then?

Touché
And everyone loves you too on here

[h again]

KevinArnottsGoldenBoot, on 09 January 2016 - 06:50 PM, said:

It was like watching a wheelie-bin topple over slowly.

Filled as I am with benevolence towards my fellow man, brought on by some excellent beer and todays game, I'll offer a bit of advice.
If you want to be taken seriously, think what else a striker might do apart from banging them in. If he can draw two defenders every time the ball comes his way, still win the ball a reasonable amount of time, lay it off to another player freed by his drawing two defenders and do this without ever losing the ball once it's in his possession - then he's a good bloke to have.
If he can score himself at the rate of one in three that's handy, but no more than reasonable for a man with his pedigree. However, he's done that in a side that didn't get the ball up front much, and didn't offer much support when they did. Things may be different from now on.
As for fitness, you won't survive 15 minutes if you aren't in top condition, let alone chase down a defender with loads of time on the ball, rob him and go on to score in the 80th minute.
So to save yourself further embarrassment, stick to subjects you know about. It might mean a lot less of your posts,but we'll have to learn to live with the disappointment.

[calvin plummers socks]

h again, on 09 January 2016 - 08:09 PM, said:

Filled as I am with benevolence towards my fellow man, brought on by some excellent beer and todays game, I'll offer a bit of advice.
If you want to be taken seriously, think what else a striker might do apart from banging them in. If he can draw two defenders every time the ball comes his way, still win the ball a reasonable amount of time, lay it off to another player freed by his drawing two defenders and do this without ever losing the ball once it's in his possession - then he's a good bloke to have.
If he can score himself at the rate of one in three that's handy, but no more than reasonable for a man with his pedigree. However, he's done that in a side that didn't get the ball up front much, and didn't offer much support when they did. Things may be different from now on.
As for fitness, you won't survive 15 minutes if you aren't in top condition, let alone chase down a defender with loads of time on the ball, rob him and go on to score in the 80th minute.
So to save yourself further embarrassment, stick to subjects you know about. It might mean a lot less of your posts,but we'll have to learn to live with the disappointment.

Erm that's strange- last week you yourself claimed we should get rid of our (3) fitness coaches (we have 1).........
Just saying like

[b2nutter]

calvin plummers socks, on 09 January 2016 - 08:13 PM, said:

Erm that's strange- last week you yourself claimed we should get rid of our (3) fitness coaches (we have 1).........
Just saying like

Like, again (snore)

[calvin plummers socks]

b2nutter, on 09 January 2016 - 08:16 PM, said:

Like, again (snore)

Ditto to you whoever the hell you are

[Snowflake McBedwetter]

h again, on 09 January 2016 - 08:09 PM, said:

Filled as I am with benevolence towards my fellow man, brought on by some excellent beer and todays game, I'll offer a bit of advice.
If you want to be taken seriously, think what else a striker might do apart from banging them in. If he can draw two defenders every time the ball comes his way, still win the ball a reasonable amount of time, lay it off to another player freed by his drawing two defenders and do this without ever losing the ball once it's in his possession - then he's a good bloke to have.
If he can score himself at the rate of one in three that's handy, but no more than reasonable for a man with his pedigree. However, he's done that in a side that didn't get the ball up front much, and didn't offer much support when they did. Things may be different from now on.
As for fitness, you won't survive 15 minutes if you aren't in top condition, let alone chase down a defender with loads of time on the ball, rob him and go on to score in the 80th minute.
So to save yourself further embarrassment, stick to subjects you know about. It might mean a lot less of your posts,but we'll have to learn to live with the disappointment.

Just from memory I remember you suggesting we 'start with Ritchie Humphries, played a 4-2-4 system, that DS was a good manager (upto the day we sacked him), that we had to sell Doyle cos his contract was up in few months... there's probably many, many more.

So needless to say, as far as being taken seriously is concerned, if I wanted to be ( I don't) I wouldn't be taking advice from Hag.

But if you and the other feckwits choose to ignore the fact that I've said SEB is quality and has the qualities you mention etc etc (barring the fitness and dedication) then I couldn't give a monkeys. Knock yourself out/Ask the nurse to up your meds.

[Westbars Spireite]

h again, on 09 January 2016 - 08:09 PM, said:

Filled as I am with benevolence towards my fellow man, brought on by some excellent beer and todays game, I'll offer a bit of advice.
If you want to be taken seriously, think what else a striker might do apart from banging them in. If he can draw two defenders every time the ball comes his way, still win the ball a reasonable amount of time, lay it off to another player freed by his drawing two defenders and do this without ever losing the ball once it's in his possession - then he's a good bloke to have.
If he can score himself at the rate of one in three that's handy, but no more than reasonable for a man with his pedigree. However, he's done that in a side that didn't get the ball up front much, and didn't offer much support when they did. Things may be different from now on.
As for fitness, you won't survive 15 minutes if you aren't in top condition, let alone chase down a defender with loads of time on the ball, rob him and go on to score in the 80th minute.
So to save yourself further embarrassment, stick to subjects you know about. It might mean a lot less of your posts,but we'll have to learn to live with the disappointment.

I liked this post. Well done Mick.

[calvin plummers socks]

KevinArnottsGoldenBoot, on 09 January 2016 - 08:51 PM, said:

Just from memory I remember you suggesting we 'start with Ritchie Humphries, played a 4-2-4 system, that DS was a good manager (upto the day we sacked him), that we had to sell Doyle cos his contract was up in few months... there's probably many, many more.

So needless to say, as far as being taken seriously is concerned, if I wanted to be ( I don't) I wouldn't be taking advice from Hag.

But if you and the other feckwits choose to ignore the fact that I've said SEB is quality and has the qualities you mention etc etc (barring the fitness and dedication) then I couldn't give a monkeys. Knock yourself out/Ask the nurse to up your meds.

Good post.
You (and I ) have not suggested that Blake is not a good player-he always has been! He just could do so much more (remember a few weeks ago when he was being lambasted by everyone-well thankfully he has started to score some goals).
Maybe Danny has insisted he does all the sessions with the rest of the team/I hope so as its vital for his fitness and the team.

[b2nutter]

calvin plummers socks, on 09 January 2016 - 08:24 PM, said:

Ditto to you whoever the hell you are

I am your Nemesis, and I will watch you whilst you sleep, whispering golden trumpets of doom in your ear. For lo', your parapet of filge might seek refuge in my armpit. For long is the night, and short are Calvin Plummer's Socks. Yea verily. Pray merrily