a kick in the balls, on 10 November 2015 - 12:42 PM, said:
Slurs?
I thought he questioned the ability of the CEO`s financial nouse, something that you first defended and now are questioning as well?
I guess that 180 degree u-turn, while still continuing to argue (why I don't know, your agreeing with him now?!) is what he defines as your twisting and turning
Actually, the only person calling the CEO's abilities into question was 'h-again'.
I simply offered a few thoughts on where the money might've gone, as requested by that same person, quoting things like staff exits, new appointments, the installation of the large screen, the refit of the lobby and lounges and percentages going to various parties involved in negotiations alongside taxes, of course.
Post #304, there for all to peruse.
Thankfully everyone seemed to accept my ideas in the spirit of debate, as they were offered, including two contributors with a far greater grasp of these issues than myself.
Unfortunately one particular individual saw it as just another excuse to post personal jibes.
My apologies to all for prolonging his involvement, and as he seems to view having the last word as some minor 'victory' I'll move on to other threads.
This post has been edited by MDCCCLXVI: 10 November 2015 - 06:09 PM