Spectrum Of Opinion
#22
Posted 12 October 2015 - 08:13 AM
Spired, on 12 October 2015 - 08:04 AM, said:
D/E
unsure about the board because of the financial stuff though they have got most of the managerial appointments right. I even think they were right to give tommy wright a chance even though it didn't work.
definitely made a big mistake appointing saunders though
This post has been edited by semi130497: 12 October 2015 - 08:16 AM
#23
Posted 12 October 2015 - 09:11 AM
Goku, on 12 October 2015 - 06:54 AM, said:
It's just that I believe in giving a manager time to develop.
He may not be the right guy- will he be given more time? I've no idea- would never advocate sacking a manager after 12 games though (especially as a third have been wins).
He's made some bad choices- Ebanks -Blake- predictably shocking, Novak- bad.
But has also been unlucky with injuries and a board who stitched him up I guess a little also
#24
Posted 12 October 2015 - 09:15 AM
calvin plummers socks, on 12 October 2015 - 09:11 AM, said:
He may not be the right guy- will he be given more time? I've no idea- would never advocate sacking a manager after 12 games though (especially as a third have been wins).
He's made some bad choices- Ebanks -Blake- predictably shocking, Novak- bad.
But has also been unlucky with injuries and a board who stitched him up I guess a little also
The sale of players was inevitable, so assuming DS has a reasonable budget he should be judged on the players he has brought in and the results of that. It's not looking good atm.
#25
Posted 12 October 2015 - 09:28 AM
After 100% attendance home and away last season, I nearly didn't go on Saturday. To put this into perspective, I live 400m away from the ground and had nothing else I particularly needed or wanted to do. I should've stayed at home and watched Scotland rugby nearly throw it away instead ....
#26
Posted 12 October 2015 - 09:31 AM
LuSiVe, on 12 October 2015 - 09:28 AM, said:
After 100% attendance home and away last season, I nearly didn't go on Saturday. To put this into perspective, I live 400m away from the ground and had nothing else I particularly needed or wanted to do. I should've stayed at home and watched Scotland rugby nearly throw it away instead ....
Yet we still had an attendance of over 6,000 including 5,700 home fans.
Does this mean people who didn't go last year are starting to attend? Or is it all bluster from a few frustrated die-hards?
#28
Posted 12 October 2015 - 09:39 AM
brianclose, on 12 October 2015 - 09:31 AM, said:
Indeed. Posters who wrongly predicted meltdown are now claiming that the figures were rigged.
#29
Posted 12 October 2015 - 11:11 AM
Without DA we would still be at Saltergate and unless someone hands him a cheque for 7 mill he is going nowhere.
On the other hand DS rambles on wanting 3 years to get it right (even though he's on a two year contract).
He's got a bigger budget than last season and although talks about Toshack, he's delivering only the first half of Toshack............ TOSH
#30
Posted 12 October 2015 - 01:30 PM
born in 1866, on 12 October 2015 - 11:11 AM, said:
Without DA we would still be at Saltergate and unless someone hands him a cheque for 7 mill he is going nowhere.
On the other hand DS rambles on wanting 3 years to get it right (even though he's on a two year contract).
He's got a bigger budget than last season and although talks about Toshack, he's delivering only the first half of Toshack............ TOSH
Hope he can HACK the second half!
#31
Posted 13 October 2015 - 10:26 AM
#32
Posted 13 October 2015 - 10:53 AM
#33
Posted 13 October 2015 - 02:59 PM
Erring towards E