Rushbury Out
#4
Posted 15 January 2015 - 12:13 AM
#5
Posted 15 January 2015 - 12:44 AM
To be honest he was on a hiding to nothing, bit like he was at CFC
There is an object lesson here, never appoint your physio as manager, generally not good for the club or the physio
#6
Posted 15 January 2015 - 07:15 AM
#7
Posted 15 January 2015 - 08:13 AM
martatcross, on 15 January 2015 - 07:15 AM, said:
I went to see tham against Grantham the other week for the first time since our pre-season friendly and was shocked as to how poor they were, Charlie Dawes included, Rushbury just stood and watched in silence, arms folded looking clueless. I reckon the decision to sack him was made then with the board lining up a replacement during the last two werks, seeing he will be named today
#8
Posted 15 January 2015 - 09:04 AM
moondog, on 15 January 2015 - 08:13 AM, said:
Charlie Dawes has got progressively worse. I've seen them a few times this season and so have Matlock. If you thought they were shocking in the Granthem game you should've seen some of the other performancesx
#9
Posted 15 January 2015 - 10:10 AM
#10
Posted 15 January 2015 - 02:27 PM
moondog, on 14 January 2015 - 11:49 PM, said:
Left by mutual consent apparently.
Baz
#12
Posted 15 January 2015 - 02:28 PM
TrueBlue Steve, on 14 January 2015 - 11:55 PM, said:

We've just appointed Mark Hume; ex Bradford PA.
Baz
#13
Posted 15 January 2015 - 02:34 PM
martatcross, on 15 January 2015 - 07:15 AM, said:
As it stands, we look nailed on for relegation, which will be a disaster for the club, but TBH we've (just about) dodged bullets fir several seasons now.
Atkins should have gone long before he eventually resigned.
We have to hope that Hume can keep us up.
Baz
#14
Posted 15 January 2015 - 02:36 PM
brianclose, on 15 January 2015 - 02:28 PM, said:
Well possibly not in a plumb position: I wouldn't employ him as a coach and if I feel that way...etc
Baz
#15
Posted 15 January 2015 - 02:41 PM
Misnomer, on 15 January 2015 - 10:10 AM, said:
That question is being asked by some on our forum, but TBF initially he delivered the goods and the consensus seemed to be that he and Foster were winning and workable; how wrong can you be.
Baz
azul, on 15 January 2015 - 09:04 AM, said:
Harsh but hard to argue.
Baz
#17
Posted 15 January 2015 - 02:46 PM
Spire-Power, on 15 January 2015 - 02:43 PM, said:
I spoke to him once down the Lane (about 4 months back) and didn't form that impression, but it's fair (you could argue) to say that some Town fans don't remember his reign very fondly.
Baz
#18
Posted 15 January 2015 - 02:54 PM
martatcross, on 15 January 2015 - 07:15 AM, said:
We need new players ASAP and the one we've just signed to shore up the defence, put through his own goal for the winner at Halesowen Town; you couldn't make it up.
We lost that one against 10 men having been 2-1 up, so the new guy's got a job on.
Baz
#19
Posted 15 January 2015 - 03:20 PM
Brimington Barry, on 15 January 2015 - 02:41 PM, said:
Baz
Harsh but hard to argue.
Baz
He initially delivered a few results with us too. A super 4-2 fightback win against Oldham from 2 down springs to mind with Reevesy doing us a favour missing a chance to equalise for them. We also pushed west ham very close in the league cup live on sky. He also signed Chris Brandon, Caleb folan, and I think Carl Muggleton maybe our bravest ever keeper. It all went wrong very quickly though.
I always felt some sympathy for Rushberry, the town job was much more difficult back then. I wonder why he keeps taking these jobs, didn't he have a sandwich shop or something?
I also wonder if his seeming arrogance was a defensive reaction to some of the horrible abuse he got.
This post has been edited by semi130497: 15 January 2015 - 03:21 PM
#20
Posted 15 January 2015 - 03:20 PM
brianclose, on 15 January 2015 - 02:28 PM, said:
Back to Cobs R Us it is then. Or has that gone belly up?