John-Joe O'toole Agent Jim
#121
Posted 09 June 2014 - 08:12 AM
#125
Posted 09 June 2014 - 10:21 AM
We are short one CM since Togwell left. We need to replace him. Speculation on how much of a percentage of the budget JJO'T would take up is just that - pure speculation.
JJO'T fits with the type of midfielder Cook likes. He's able to chip in from Midfield with goals. Defensive cover for Morsy and Ryan will be provided by Hird.
I'll judge him from his performances in a town shirt (if he signs). Some folks are already lining up on here to slate him. It's really easy to do that. Easier to say he's going to be crap so you can say I told you so if he is. Plus you'll get less flack for saying "I was wrong" if he isn't.
This post has been edited by DMU Blue: 09 June 2014 - 10:22 AM
#126
Posted 09 June 2014 - 10:29 AM
DMU Blue, on 09 June 2014 - 10:21 AM, said:
We are short one CM since Togwell left. We need to replace him. Speculation on how much of a percentage of the budget JJO'T would take up is just that - pure speculation.
JJO'T fits with the type of midfielder Cook likes. He's able to chip in from Midfield with goals. Defensive cover for Morsy and Ryan will be provided by Hird.
I'll judge him from his performances in a town shirt (if he signs). Some folks are already lining up on here to slate him. It's really easy to do that. Easier to say he's going to be crap so you can say I told you so if he is. Plus you'll get less flack for saying "I was wrong" if he isn't.
Agree with this. Cook cant afford to make bad signings for L1 and wont take risks on any player costing a reasonable wedge. We have to trust his judgement. When all's said and done, he might not even be trying to sign O'Toole!
This post has been edited by Spire-Power: 09 June 2014 - 10:30 AM
#127
Posted 09 June 2014 - 10:33 AM
#128
Posted 09 June 2014 - 10:49 AM
Tyrion, on 09 June 2014 - 10:33 AM, said:
Similar players I would think but O'Toole has more 'form in the book' as bonnyman likes to say (including many games at Championship level). Still a good age at 25 as well.
#129
Posted 09 June 2014 - 10:52 AM
My recollections of Atkinson were only the goals, I don't remember his all-round play
#130
Posted 09 June 2014 - 10:55 AM
Phil V 72, on 09 June 2014 - 10:52 AM, said:
My recollections of Atkinson were only the goals, I don't remember his all-round play
O'Toole is pretty tall - 6ft 2.
Same thing levelled at O'Tooles allround play as Atkinson's - sometimes dieappears from games or doesnt impose himself enough. Question is - would you rather have goals or physical presence from a midfielder? You cant have both as those type of midfielders play in the Premiership.
#131
Posted 09 June 2014 - 10:59 AM
brianclose, on 09 June 2014 - 10:55 AM, said:
Same thing levelled at O'Tooles allround play as Atkinson's - sometimes dieappears from games or doesnt impose himself enough. Question is - would you rather have goals or physical presence from a midfielder? You cant have both as those type of midfielders play in the Premiership.
I think we need a bit more height from set pieces, more bodies in the box, especially defending. If we could add a tall striker as well, that should make defending more effective and attacking more potent.
#132
Posted 09 June 2014 - 11:24 AM
Westbars Spireite, on 09 June 2014 - 06:57 AM, said:
not sure what you base that on. I'm sure we'll want to spend as little as possible but there is no point going for a cheap option, the players we sign have got to be good enough to do the job and strengthen the first team. We won't be able to sign players who will strengthen our already strong squad for peanuts.
We have no idea what JJOT was on, the BR forums quote anything from under 2k to 4k, please don't start a Marc Richards style witch hunt against any new signing because you 'expect' him to be on megabucks. We can trust our board to only sign players we can afford.
#133
Posted 09 June 2014 - 11:30 AM
As for JJOT, I've not seen enough of the guy to really have a firm opinion but his stats last season look decent and in a 4-2-3-1 we are always going to be reliant on getting plenty of goals from the midfield and this guy does seem to have an eye for goal.
#134
Posted 09 June 2014 - 11:37 AM
Andy Spireite, on 09 June 2014 - 11:30 AM, said:
No. He seems to have picked this one up from the southend local paper - he seems to be based down that way. His posts tend to be scattergun - and to repeat stuff that's already appeared elsewhere - but he doesn't half blow his own trumpet if one ever comes off, but that is very rarely - seems to be less than one in a hundred! He certainly doesn't seem to have any good contacts within the game
#135
Posted 09 June 2014 - 11:59 AM
Phil V 72, on 09 June 2014 - 10:59 AM, said:
I think you are right on one thing we do need more height in defending set pieces because how many times was it Richards doing the clearance headers.
#136
Posted 09 June 2014 - 12:44 PM
Tyrion, on 09 June 2014 - 10:33 AM, said:
Wouldn't touch Atkinson
#138
Posted 09 June 2014 - 02:18 PM
Xerxes, on 09 June 2014 - 11:24 AM, said:
We have no idea what JJOT was on, the BR forums quote anything from under 2k to 4k, please don't start a Marc Richards style witch hunt against any new signing because you 'expect' him to be on megabucks. We can trust our board to only sign players we can afford.
Simple really. We don't have unlimited funds. Priority positions are elsewhere.
Do you think I personally would start a 'witch hunt' or is it just your choice of words that suggests me personally?
#139
Posted 09 June 2014 - 02:32 PM
#140
Posted 09 June 2014 - 02:51 PM
Xerxes, on 09 June 2014 - 11:24 AM, said:
We have no idea what JJOT was on, the BR forums quote anything from under 2k to 4k, please don't start a Marc Richards style witch hunt against any new signing because you 'expect' him to be on megabucks. We can trust our board to only sign players we can afford.
I cant imagine anything being as bad as that to be honest.